Tag: Certis Cisco

  • Exposing Half-Truths Behind Certis Cisco’s Taiwanese Recruitment

    Exposing Half-Truths Behind Certis Cisco’s Taiwanese Recruitment

    I refer to “Certis Cisco recruiting officers from Taiwan”. There’s more than meets the eye.

    Certis Cisco (CC), a subsidiary of Temasek Holdings, was supposed to have advertised, but probably did not, on the Jobs Bank.

    Temasek Holdings, which owns or is the major shareholder of government-linked companies, employs hundreds of thousands of cheaper (sometimes not) foreigners. So long as PAP continues to run Singapore as a corporation, Singaporeans should not expect our FT policy to be discarded.

    Our FT policy also generates revenue for the government, as in the case of CC’s Taiwanese recruitment.

    CC’s actual total cost – including the cost of levy and accommodation – of employing a Taiwanese officer with a degree is about $4000. Why CC is willing to pay so much to hire a foreigner is because part of its costs, eg S-Pass is in fact revenue to the government. Should CC employ a local, PAP earns nothing.

    CC is likely to house its foreigner workforce at accommodations managed by EM Services or other GLCs. Through PAP’s FT policy, the government, GLCs and Temasek are clearly the winners at Singaporeans’ expense.

    CC is willing to pay:
    – A monthly salary of $2675
    – Free accommodation (estimated cost $500)
    – Total bonus of $4000 upon completion of 2-year contract
    – $650 for S-Pass

    * $4000/24 months

    From the table above, it will cost CC at least $3991 per month to employ a Taiwanese. This excludes other miscellaneous costs such as return air ticket, additional overseas recruitment costs,etc.

    Hiring foreigners come with social costs and CC should actually offer a premium when hiring Singaporeans.

    CC spokesman was therefore telling an outright half truth when she said “The manpower shortage is a perennial situation in Singapore, and we have been working with the authorities to recruit from suitable alternative sources”.

    CC did not offer to hire Singaporeans based on the total higher amount it was willing to pay a foreigner, ie costs of levy and accommodation amounting to more than $1000 were excluded.

    A foreigner with a monthly levy of, say, $500 adds up to $6000 in yearly government revenue. Multiply this by 500,000 foreigners, PAP earns $3 billion yearly without generating any economic activity and at the stroke of a pen. Who really needs scholars to run Singapore when money drops from the sky?

    Monthly levy collection: $500
    Yearly levy collecion: $6000
    X 500,000 foreign workers: $3 billion
    X 1,000,000 foreign workers: $6 billion

    From the above, one should be able to understand clearly why Lau Goh’s FT policy will be here for good.

    For jobless and retrenched Singaporeans, you-die-your-own-business policy has always applied. But don’t say the PAP has no compassion – it has schemes such as WIS in place. So long as one is willing to accept any low-wage job and forego one’s dignity, the WIS recipient will receive a regular peanuts cash and CPF contribution.

    PAP must continue hiring foreigners to increase headcount because an increased population density supports increasing property prices. PAP’s economic growth model has always relied on foreigner population – not productivity – growth.

    Minister Shanmugam has also recently said that only Singaporeans, Singapore PRs and Malaysians are eligible to apply. Is CC, under Temasek CEO Ho Ching, able to suka suka override the Law Minister? Why were Taiwanese suddenly included in the hiring pool with no debate in Parliament?

    CC has obviously not advertised in Malaysian states as the response would have been overwhelming. From the same table above, the salary and bonus alone amounted to a monthly salary $2841 – equivalent to about 8700 Malaysian ringgit.

    Since lodging is provided, a Malaysian recruit can easily save $2000 every month, or about RM6000. CC wants to take Singaporeans for idiots – not a single Malaysian wanted the job and it has to recruit 120 officers from Taiwan.

    PAP’s FT policy generates revenue for the government through levy collection, eg S-Pass, increases revenue/profit for government-linked companies by lowering costs and ultimately increases Temasek’s profits. This is done at the expense of Singaporeans.

    It should therefore not have surprised anyone when a GLC like Certis Cisco engages in half truths to recruit foreigners living 3000 km away.

     

    Source: https://likedatosocanmeh.wordpress.com/

  • Nazem Suki: Security Companies Should Consider Hiring More Malay-Muslim APOs From Malaysia

    Nazem Suki: Security Companies Should Consider Hiring More Malay-Muslim APOs From Malaysia

    May I refer 7 of my uni grad friends to Cisco Certis or any other security companies. They are keen to be a auxiliary police officers or security officers in Singapore. For obvious reasons of the good SGD salary and currency exchange rates.

    Graduated from :

    Australia Uni
    1) Queensland Uni of Technology
    2) Uni of Adelaide
    3) Griffith Uni

    Canada Uni
    4) Uni of Western Ontario
    5) Uni of Toronto

    England Uni
    6) Uni of Warwick

    USA Uni
    7) Uni of Pittsburgh

    Nationality : Citizen of Malaysia (Bumiputera)
    Gender & Age : Male in late 20s
    Employment : Employed and semi-employed
    Race : Malay
    Religion : Islam

    They are seriously over qualified but they believed the prospects and career in Singapore as security personnel is fulfilling.

    All of them, and myself discussed this prospects 2hrs ago and concluded that once they get accepted, many more will join them.

    What say you?

     

    Source: Mohamed Nazem Suki

  • He Helped Hide Bullet Fired During Game

    He Helped Hide Bullet Fired During Game

    While on duty at the Tuas Checkpoint in Aug last year, a Certis Cisco corporal decided to have some fun with his revolver.

    But his firing of the weapon led to a series of attempts to cover up the offence and eventually got his colleague fired, fined and jailed.

    Last Aug 13, Gregory Lai Kar Jun, 23, and his then-colleague, Muhammad Dzul Adhar Azmi, who was also a Certis Cisco corporal at that time, were at an observation point at the Checkpoint.

    Lai took out his revolver to play a game similar to Russian roulette.

    Dzul, now 22, was nearby when Lai fired one shot.

    Instead of reporting it to the authorities, Dzul kept mum and even tried to help his friend cover his tracks.

    But they were caught and Dzul was jailed three weeks and fined $2,000 yesterday.

    He pleaded guilty to one count each of intentionally obstructing the course of justice and failing to give information to the police about the rash act Lai had allegedly committed.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Sarah Shi said Lai placed a bullet into the chamber of his revolver at around 2pm on Aug 13 last year before pulling the trigger.

    The weapon did not fire at first, but it went off when Lai pulled the trigger again.

    Lai later found the used bullet under a table at the observation point and took it.

    DPP Shi said: “Lai told the accused that he had an idea to put one bullet in a toilet bowl, following which he would claim that he had lost two bullets while using the toilet.”

    Dzul agreed to help him and they planned to get rid of the used bullet.

    DPP Shi told District Judge Crystal Ong that Lai hatched a plan to hide it in a traffic wand and Dzul agreed to help him.

    After concealing it in the wand, Lai went to a nearby restroom and threw a second bullet into a toilet bowl.

    He then reported the matter to the Tuas Checkpoint operations room.

    In the meantime, Dzul retrieved the used bullet from the traffic wand and placed it inside a cigarette box.

    Police officers conducted their investigation and tried to look for the bullet at around 8.50pm that day.

    Dzul and Lai also took part in the search.

    DPP Shi said Dzul took the discharged round to Bedok Reservoir and threw it into the water at around 2am the next day.

    SERIOUS OFFENCE

    Stressing that Lai’s alleged offence was a serious one, she urged Judge Ong to jail Dzul between one and two months, and fine him $2,000.

    Dzul’s lawyer, Mr Rajan Supramaniam, told the court his client had lost his job with Certis Cisco due to his offences and is now working as a truck assistant.

    He added Dzul had been blinded by his loyalty to Lai and asked for his client to be given the minimum sentence.

    Lai’s case is still pending.

    For intentionally obstructing the course of justice, Dzul could have been jailed up to seven years and fined.

    And for failing to give information to the police about the rash act Lai had allegedly committed, he could have been jailed up to six months and fined.

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • Certis Cisco Warden Didn’t Want To Do His Job, Refused To Issue Summons To Illegally Parked Vehicles At My Flat

    Certis Cisco Warden Didn’t Want To Do His Job, Refused To Issue Summons To Illegally Parked Vehicles At My Flat

    I was on my way to work this morning and i caught a few vehicles parking illegally in No Parking Area, Double yellow lines and Season Parking Lots underneath my flat located in 668 Chander Road.

    I managed to get hold of one of Certis Cisco Wardens that were deployed there but he refused to summon those vehicles claiming those lots are under the charge of his colleague.

    He then tried to leave the scene with his motorbike without issuing any summon.

    Attached are the photos of those vehicles illegally parked in bke 1 and the warden involved and the licence plate of his motorbike.

    Illegally Parked Car 1 Illegally Parked Car 2 Illegally Parked Car 3 Illegally Parked Car 4

     

    All friends kindly help me and share because i want Certis Cisco to be accountable for having wardens like him.

     

    Source: Kelvin Meng Hwee Lim

  • Handicapped Driver Got Fined $100 For Parking at Handicap Lot

    Image from Stomp
    Image from Stomp

    summon1

    summon2
    Image from Stomp

    Stomper dukun says he was issued a parking ticket on Sunday (May 11) for parking in a handicap lot — even though he was a handicapped driver.

    He even had a handicap parking label displayed on his vehicle.

    Said the Stomper:

    “I was booked by Certis Cisco officer Siti Farhanah for parking at a handicap lot last Sunday (May 11) at about 10.53am.

    “I am a handicapped vehicle driver with a valid handicap label on my vehicle.

    “Since when is a vehicle with a valid handicap label are not allowed to park at handicap lots?”

    Source: http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/singaporeseen/this-urban-jungle/driver-issued-100-fine-for-parking-at-handicap-lot-despite-label-on-his-car

     

    EDITOR’S NOTE

    To all parking wardens, please check the all the labels on the vehicle. Sometimes there are too many labels, so take your time to look through each and every one of them.

    To all drivers, please display your parking labels correctly where visible to avoid getting any parking ticket from parking wardens.

    Human errors do happen especially when you are tired or have an urgent need to run to the toilet. Not everyday our body and mind are in tip-top condition, right?

    So take a chill pill and this matter can easily be resolved with just an email or a phone call.

    letters to R1C banner