Tag: debate

  • Osman Sulaiman: No Hope Of PAP Malay MPs Speaking Up On Oxley Issue

    Osman Sulaiman: No Hope Of PAP Malay MPs Speaking Up On Oxley Issue

    PM Lee is going to make a ministerial statement in parliament [today] regarding the allegations made by his siblings. Party whip has been lifted and PM Lee has urged all our MPs to question him robustly.

    I dont think there will be any meaningful questions from the PAP MPs. Who would question their superiors in the real world? So this ministerial statement is just nothing but a smoke screen to appear to be upfront.

    Halimah Yaacob has spoken and said that she hopes Oxley Road dispute will be ‘properly debated’.

    Who among those MPs will fire the first salvo? Definitely not the Malay PAP MPs. They are known to acquiesce to anything the PAP wanted even at the expense of the community.

    Instead of being the voice for the people, they are the voice of the PAP.

    I’ve long ago lost hope on ‘our representative’ to stand up for us. This is why I ventured into politics. Our voices are not heard in parliament often enough.

    I would put my hope more on the non Malay Mps to speak up. Our Malay PAP MPs are just too weak politically and emasculated to be fighting for us.

     

    Source: Khan Osman Sulaiman

  • Noor Mastura: Don’t Use Hijab Issue To Divide Community

    Noor Mastura: Don’t Use Hijab Issue To Divide Community

    It is ignorant to get into this hejab debate without knowing –

    1. The history of why the Sikhs are allowed turbans
    2. The fiqh & adab(ruling and ethics) of being ruled under a government which is not Muslim
    3. The historical and political context of non muslim governments who have allowed the hejab
    4. The extent of the current disintegration of the social cohesion in US and EU, especially towards Muslims – as compared to Singapore & how and why this happened

    So if you are going to share, comment & post this article, by all means. But please thread with caution especially if your only argument is “it is wajib (compulsory) in Islam” or ‘comparative analysis between other religions/countries based on the hejab solely’.

    This is a conversation we need to have, granted – but social media has never been the place for a dialogue. By lashing your opinions online without knowing the full picture, you only tear down our social fabric and serve to fuel a dangerous fire.

     

    Source: Noor Mastura

  • Singapore Has Always Been Fundamentally Secular

    Singapore Has Always Been Fundamentally Secular

    I disagree with the writer’s views in the letter “Don’t let secular fundamentalism be the norm” (May 15). I think Singapore is fundamentally secular.

    While I agree that some Singaporeans cannot help it if their religious beliefs colour their contribution to public discourse, the writer is confusing “is” with “ought”. Public discourse should be as secular as possible because to engage in it is to consider the interests of all Singaporeans, and not all believe in the tenets of any one religion.

    Consequently, any laws or policies influenced by the tenets of any one religion are liable to be divisive and not representative of the views and interests of all Singaporeans. Thus, since independence, Singapore has pursued a secular approach.

    The late Mr Lee Kuan Yew even remarked that religious leaders should “take off (their) clerical robes” before taking on anything political. This is because our founders recognised the partiality and potential divisiveness of religion in public discourse.

    Secular fundamentalism has always been the norm: It is simply a steadfast, fundamental adherence to secularism in public discourse. To do away with it is to do away with a core principle on which Singapore is founded.

     

    *This article was written by Benjamin Seet Chong Eng, in Voices, Today, on 18 May 2015.

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • International Islamic University Malaysia Student Named Best Overall Speaker At Cambridge University Women’s Open Debate

    International Islamic University Malaysia Student Named Best Overall Speaker At Cambridge University Women’s Open Debate

    PETALING JAYA: International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) student Ameera Natasha Moore has been named best overall speaker in the recently concluded Cambridge University Women’s Debate Open.

    In receiving the award, the third-year law student outranked debaters from renowned institutions including Oxford University, Durham University, Trinity College Dublin, University College London, Vienna University, Berlin University, St Andrews University, Warwick University, the London School of Economics and Tel Aviv University among others.

    Ameera, 21, and her team-mate from IIUM, Sara Rahim, 19, were the highest ranked team in the tournament, also known as The Norton Rose Fulbright Cambridge Women’s Open, after accumulating the most speaker points in all four preliminary rounds.

    However, IIUM bowed out in the four-way semi-finals knock-out round against Trinity College Dublin and two teams from Oxford University.

    The ranking is just another cap in Ameera’s impressive international debate resume.

    Ameera is also a two-time English as a Second Language (ESL) winner of the Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championship, the champion and overall best speaker of the Asian English Olympics Debate Tournament 2014, and an ESL semi-finalist of the prestigious World Universities Debating Championship 2014 held in India.

    Apart from being crowned this year’s Malaysian Royal National Debating Champion, the Sekolah Seri Puteri alumna has also accumulated a long list of trophies from various local tournaments.

    “I feel great. I definitely was not expecting (the ranking) as I knew the competition was tough! Yet at the same time, I feel satisfied because being one of the only Asian teams there and to dispel the myth that women can’t talk about sports or international relations, was an experience I’ll never forget,” Ameera told The Star Online.


    “During the tournament, my team-mate Sarah and I were practically jumping when the motion ‘This House Believes that the US and Iran should form alliances to fight against the Islamic State’, was revealed as we had done extensive research on the issue.

    When asked to share her most memorable experience during the competition, Ameera said: “To come out of that debate ranking first with our opponents, including Oxford, congratulating us and saying that it was very well deserved, meant so much. To know that even your opponents are happy for you, that’s something that words can’t describe.”

    After graduation, Ameera looks forward to working closely with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in helping with the plight of women and children.

    “It’s important for women to use debate as a platform to break down existing stereotypes. Especially where women’s and girls’ rights are undermined, debate can be used as the most effective tool for changing mindsets and questioning patriarchal attitudes at politics, work and at home,” added Sarah, a second year IIUM economics student from Afghanistan.

    The competition, which was held in Cambridge University, United Kingdom, on Nov 23, saw 51 all-women teams from across the world taking part.

    Although most participants debated under the banners of their universities and tertiary institutions, the competition was also open to composite teams made up from several institutions.

    The tournament was held to encourage participation from women in the debating scene and to raise awareness of women’s issues.

     

    Source: http://www.thestar.com.my