Tag: discrimination

  • Women Taking On Lead Roles In Male-Dominated Professions

    Women Taking On Lead Roles In Male-Dominated Professions

    Women make up about 45 per cent of the Republic’s workforce, and are increasingly taking on leading roles in traditionally male dominated professions.

    Channel NewsAsia spoke to two women public officers who are leaders in their field.

    GENDER NOT AN ISSUE WHEN FIGHTING FIRES: MAJOR ELLENA QUEK

    Ms Ellena Quek used to head Jurong Fire Station which is home to about 140 officers. The 32-year-old was the third female officer to command a fire station in Singapore. She is now posted to the Ministry of Home Affairs.

    The Major who joined the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) in 2005 said her gender was never an issue when it came to fighting fires.

    “I think at the fire site or the incident site, a lot of the stereotypes that we have don’t matter anymore, because the fire doesn’t care whether you are male or female or whatever qualifications you have,” Major Quek said.

    Major Quek and her fellow woman officers make up 14 per cent of the SCDF’s uniformed and civilian personnel.

    The SCDF said it started recruiting female officers as early as the 1980s. In the early years, female officers were only trained in administrative work. But the SCDF said more female officers have taken on higher appointments such as Fire Station Commander, Division Commander or Director of a Staff Department.

    Major Quek said female officers bring with them a different dynamic.

    “Female officers have an advantage, in relationship-building and also in our sensitivity to situations, especially when there’s trauma involved. A lot of the things that we see on a daily basis – they are not what you would see outside in your everyday life,” she said.

    “I HAVE TO BRACE MYSELF TO LOOK CONFIDENT”: SUPERINTENDENT JEAN CHIANG

    Superintendent Jean Chiang – who works for the Singapore Prison Service (SPS) – shares her sentiments. She is the second-in-command of a pre-release centre for offenders.

    Superintendent Chiang has steadily climbed up the ranks, behind the iron bars and cold concrete walls.

    “I must share that it is a challenge to be in front of male inmates, who are tall, big, burly. Many of them have tattoos, and I have to stand in front of hundreds of them, to address them in big groups at times. So definitely, that was something new to me and something that I have to brace myself for to stand up in front of them and to look confident and authoritative,” she revealed.

    The SPS said it is seeing more women applying to join the service through the years. Just like Superintendent Chiang, many of them have become leaders in their fields.

    “The basic principle of why SPS deploys women officers in the first place is that the organisation recognises us as competent, capable and thus, we do not want to portray ourselves as the weaker sex but rather fully competent and capable in managing male inmates as well,” she said.

    To ensure the safety of its women officers, there are strict guidelines on the roles of female staff, particularly in male institutions. For example, women officers do not enter the toilet or bathing facilities of inmates, when they are in use.

    They also do not manage high-risk inmates like sexual offenders and those who are violent. They must also be accompanied by male officers in areas where inmates congregate.

    Why are women taking on these jobs despite the obvious challenges?

    Superintendent Chiang said: “When we see that that we are able to help them achieve some things, we see that we are able to motivate them to change. I think that is very, very satisfying.”

    Major Quek noted: “Really, gender doesn’t matter. It is how you prove yourself and what you do that matters.”

    As these women prove – that is what matters most when it comes to serving Singapore.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Setiausaha Agung PKMS: Melayu Singapura Perlu Berjuang Berteraskan Kudrat Sendiri

    Setiausaha Agung PKMS: Melayu Singapura Perlu Berjuang Berteraskan Kudrat Sendiri

    PETALING JAYA: Setiausaha Agung Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Singapura, A Jamal Rashid mendakwa, kira-kira 15 peratus atau lebih 500,000 rakyat Singapura berbangsa Melayu menghadapi pelbagai isu diskriminasi.

    Akhbar Berita Harian hari ini melaporkan, beliau mendakwa selain isu larangan pemakaian tudung, peluang orang Melayu memegang jawatan tinggi dalam organisasi juga disekat.

    “Alasan yang diberikan, kononnya mengambil kira sensitiviti serantau. Walaupun sudah dibentangkan di Parlimen, kerajaan menolak dakwaan bahawa diskriminasi kaum wujud. Sektor awam paling ketara kerana dipelopori kaum bukan Melayu,” katanya.

    Beliau berkata: ”Majikan mendakwa pengambilan pekerja dibuat berdasarkan sistem meritokrasi. Hakikatnya, sikap ‘pilih bulu’ seperti mengutamakan calon kaum Cina atau yang mempunyai asas bahasa Mandarin masih wujud walaupun selepas diminta diberi pertimbangan sewajarnya.”

    Apabila ditanya sama ada benarkah dakwaan bahawa kepentingan dan nasib masyarakat Melayu di Singapura sering dipinggirkan, Jamal mendakwa menerusi media sosial, suara masyarakat Melayu terutama keluhan dan pendapat mereka semakin didengari.

    BH Interview With SG PKMS

    “Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (ACP) di Singapura yang lazimnya dipelopori pelajar Cina adalah generasi pelapis di peringkat penggubal dasar kerajaan. Maka, mereka kurang berinteraksi secara langsung dengan Melayu sehingga mengakibatkan sesuatu dasar yang dirangka itu tidak inklusif,” katanya.

    Jamal juga berkata, iltizam UMNO menunjangi perjuangan Melayu, institusi beraja dan Islam di Malaysia wajar dan seharusnya diteruskan kerana tambahnya, “Masyarakat Melayu Singapura sering mengambil teladan dan pelbagai usaha dirangka UMNO, supaya dasar sama boleh dilaksanakan.”

    “Konsep wasatiyyah atau kesederhanaan diterapkan UMNO dilihat pendekatan terbaik bagi mengimbangi kepentingan Melayu di Singapura, di samping menjaga hak kaum lain,” katanya.

     

    Sources: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category and https://www.facebook.com/pkms.org.sg

  • Osman Sulaiman: Malay Muslim Community Must Make A Stand As The Government’s Inconsistent Policies Continue to Divide

    Osman Sulaiman: Malay Muslim Community Must Make A Stand As The Government’s Inconsistent Policies Continue to Divide

    I believe the reason why some people still fear the Muslim women who wear the hijab is becoz they have little or poor knowledge on why these ladies put it on. And they most probably have not had the opportunity nor the exposure to mingle and make contact with them.

    For 50 years, our gov has all of the necessary apparatus to assuage this matter but it has not done so and has in fact shown to be unwilling to do so. It continues to do this so that it can rule by division.

    They continue to disallow any muslim child who wear the headgear from attending the mainstream school and thus segregating the mass of the population from these people and thus compounding the misconception about people who wear the hijabs.

    Many studies have shown that the younger the child is exposed to a certain environment, the better these children will be able to adapt. Unfortunately, the people that rule us think otherwise.

    How then do we integrate people of different faith together? Oddly enough, the Sikh community is given the green light to wear the turban in school if they choose to.

    Dont get me wrong. Im not advocating for the gov to ban turbans in pri and sec schools becoz the muslim girls weren’t allowed to practice their faith but rather to apply the policy consistently for the greater good of the people as a whole.

    For all of its time in power, our gov has continued with its iniquity towards certain segment of the society in particular the malays and/or muslims.

    From time to time, we will also hear the ministers on record to give their skewed perspective of the malays and muslims, creating further doubts. I wonder how our malay/muslim ministers feel serving such a government.

    I also find it hard to swallow that Singapore reproves its neighbour up north for their exclusion of talent based on race but at the same time doing exactly the opposite of what it propagates.

    Other than disallowing the muslim girls who wear the headgear in pri and sec mainstream schools, many job opportunities (particularly in the uniform groups) are also not made available to them by way of implementing discriminating policies. This act has unfortunately spilled over to the private sectors.

    Our gov is certainly not oblivious on the aspirations of the malay/muslim community to be treated justly and to remove any doubts on its loyalty towards the nation. It has come to a point where our fundamental rights are now treated as candies to be given at the pleasure of these people governing us.

    If there are social faultlines that divide us, especially on race or religion, then i believe this gov is the main contributor of such matters.

    It has been many years my community keep giving this current gov their support but have seen no change to this issue. I implore my community to rethink on their choices. The support should be given to people who believe in inclusiveness. Not the artificial ones that we are experiencing now.

    Ask yourself this pertinent question. How many more years do we want to wait? If we have never contributed anything significant to our own community, this is the best chance to do so on a huge scale.

    We cant have any success without a little sacrifice. We should not fear the unknown. No one will change our fate unless we change it ourselves.

    We need to rally our family members and friends to do what is needed. Im afraid that with the influx of new citizens, our political voices will be diminished further. It might then be too late for any regrets.

    Regards,
    Osman Sulaiman

     

    Authored by Osman Sulaiman.

  • Is The PAP Government Being Selectively Pro-Family?

    Is The PAP Government Being Selectively Pro-Family?

    Kirsten Han is a Singaporean blogger, journalist and filmmaker. She is also involved in the We Believe in Second Chances campaign for the abolishment of the death penalty. A social media junkie, she tweets at @kixes. The views expressed are her own.

    Singapore, we are told, is a pro-family country. The government actively introduces policies that will encourage young Singaporeans to get married and have children, and nuclear families are often given benefits in the form of tax rebates and subsidies. 

    Yet there are sometimes stories that make you doubt that stance.

    The New Paper ran an article on 17 November about a family now torn apart: upon returning to Singapore and applying for a Long-Term Visit Pass, married couple Mr Y. C. Chen and Ms Li Qiaoyan realised that Ms Li had been served an entry ban. Her offence was not seeking permission from the Ministry of Manpower before getting pregnant and married. Ms Li is now back in China, while Mr Chen had to quit his job to care for their 10-month-old son.

    Under Singapore’s current rules, existing and former work permit holders are required to obtain permission from the state before marrying Singaporeans. According to The New Paper, the Ministry of Manpower says:

    “MOM reviews all marriage applications on a case-by-case basis. Factors taken into consideration include the economic contributions of the applicants, the ability of the applicants to look after themselves and their family without becoming a burden to the society or state.” 

    The New Paper also reported MOM’s position that “work-permit holders, as transient workers, ought to come to Singapore only for work”.

    There are 980,8000 work permit holders in Singapore. It’s impossible that these men and women are here “only for work”; they don’t just come here to serve us food, work in our construction sites and clean our homes. They come here with all their likes and dislikes, their hopes, dreams and desires. They’re people. It’s hardly surprising that they might meet someone and fall in love. 

    Yet the state doesn’t seem to see them as the multi-dimensional human beings they are. It expects them to serve, and only to serve. When they fall in love and want to get married or have children, they are expected to apply to Singapore for permission, even though it should be none of the state’s business who anyone chooses to marry. The state will then decide if the work permit holder is a worthy (read: economically viable) spouse for the Singaporean.

    This rule even applies to former work permit holders. Come to Singapore on a work permit and your desire to marry your partner – if he/she is a Singaporean – will always be dependent on special dispensation from the Controller of Work Passes.

    Such rules and requirements show us that the state is, perhaps, only pro-a-certain-type-of-family. If you’re a non-Singaporean, if your “economic contribution” is deemed wanting, then maybe your family is not so important after all.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • David Tan Tells Government To Trust Talented Malays

    David Tan Tells Government To Trust Talented Malays

    During my Raffles Institution (RI) teaching days, I had the privilege to have many Malay boys as my students. Many came from poor homes although they were bright, intelligent and very polite. Many of them loved to play soccer but after each game, were too poor to buy drinks to quench their thirst. I helped them out in small ways by forking out part of my meagre salary to buy bottles of syrup drinks so they could mix with tap water to drink. I took many photographs with them during those RI days. Most of them were very good looking and talented in soccer, music and art.

    I was extremely delighted when one of the boys, now a pilot with SIA invited me to one of his daughters’ wedding. Many of my ex-RI Malay students were invited too. I had a great time with them but it took me a while to recognize some of them. I was so proud of what they are today. Among them are senior government officials, diplomats, pilots, heads of organizations and other professionals. They have proven that race is never a part or component of one’s success.

    They are the evidence of a responsible minority group of Singaporeans who have succeeded and contributed to our nation. One of the feedback from them included their unhappiness over being ‘passed over’ for Officer Cadets’ courses when they were called up for national service. Most of them possessed the necessary physique, academic and moral qualities to be selected for the Officer Cadets’ course but ended up being clerks, storekeepers or performing other unimportant administrative tasks in the army. What a shame and a waste of talent! This lack of trust by our current government must be changed and rectified for our minority races.

    I am humbled by their remembrance and their respect for me. I am also extremely happy that many of them are in regular communication with me. Being a teacher has its rewards!

     

    *Article was written by David Tan and first appeared on http://singfirst.org/2014/11/16/david-tan-our-malay-students-are-under-utilised-and-under-nurtured/

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com