Tag: Islam

  • Taco Dendeng, A New Rising Food Star At Pasar Malams

    Taco Dendeng, A New Rising Food Star At Pasar Malams

    For the longest time, the Ramly burger has been the essential pasar malam (night market) food. But it seems like it is now facing some stiff competition.

    To fully know what is challenging the Ramly burger’s supremacy, you have to know these:

    What is Dendeng?

    Dendeng is an Indonesian delicacy of thinly sliced grilled meat marinated with sugar and spices. It is like bak kwa or jerky, except that the meat used is either chicken or beef.

     

    Dendeng. Source: <a href=
    Dendeng. Source: Wikipedia 

    What is Taco?

    Taco is a traditional Mexican dish of tortilla and various fillings.

     

    Tacos. Source: Wikipedia
    Tacos. Source: Wikipedia

     

    Taco Dendeng

    Together, dendeng and taco make a great idea of a fusion dish – Taco Dendeng. It is a taco shell filled with a piece of dendeng, some cabbage and home-made salsa.

    Created and sold by Dendeng Duo at pasar malams, Taco Dendeng combines the best of taco and dendeng.

    This is what it looks like:

    Photo from Dendeng Duo Facebook
    Photo from Dendeng Duo Facebook

    The brainchild of Nur Azhar Sulaiman, 32, and Qaliff Rahim, 28, the co-founders of Dendeng Duo, Taco Dendeng can also be customised with an eclectic range of sauces, such as nacho cheese, wasabi mayo, spicy garlic aioli, and even salted egg yolk.

    Here’s how the dish is prepared:

    People are loving it.

    It seems that this innovative new addition to pasar malam fare has really spiced up the scene and challenged the old Ramly burger order.

    Just look at these.

    Bagus lah, Dendeng Duo!

     

    Source: MothershipSG

  • Malay Woman Seeks Fund To Help Save Dog After Hit-And-Run

    Malay Woman Seeks Fund To Help Save Dog After Hit-And-Run

    A Malay woman who caught the attention of netizens for rescuing a badly injured dog in Malacca on Saturday (March 4) is now hoping the public could donate to help fund the mongrel’s surgery.

    The girl known on Facebook as Ziezie Zeyta said on her profile last night that while she has received some donation, the amount was still insufficient to cover the medical cost, which she said was RM1,500 (S$475).

    “[God bless], thank you so much to everyone who donated to help save the dog… I hope Allah will bless you all with good health and prosperity,” Ziezy wrote.

    “But according to the latest information the fund is still insufficient to cover the cost. I plead for your kindness to help donate a little for surgery and the ward.

    “Only Allah can repay your good deeds,” she added.

    Pictures of the mongrel’s X-ray scans, which accompanied the woman’s post, showed the dog’s left leg was severely broken.

    She wrote on her Facebook:

    Bismillah..
    Alhamdulillah..
    Terima kasih pd anda semua yg telah membantu menyumbang kn dana pd Anjing ini..semoga anda semua diberkati Allah dan di Murah kan rezeki.

    Maklumat Terkini Kos Rawatan Masih Lagi Tidak Mencukupi. Mohon Jasa Baik Anda Semua Untuk Memberi Sedikit Sumbangan Kepada Kos Rawatan Anjing ini melakukan Operation dan ward. Hanya Allah sahaja yang mampu membalas jasa baik anda semua.

    Sumbangan boleh di buat di Akaun Tersebut: Kos operation RM1500 termasuk warded 2 minggu dan ubat.
    Acc no. bank cimb-
    ‭8007776310‬ Maju animal clinic. Sila Hantar Pic Resit Untuk Kami Beri Kepada pihak veterinar. Atau anda Boleh Terus Menghubungi Norashikin Ahmad

     

    Source: Ziezie Zeyta

  • Managing Conflict The Mufti Way: Singaporean Muslims Have To Be Steadfast In Their Beliefs

    Managing Conflict The Mufti Way: Singaporean Muslims Have To Be Steadfast In Their Beliefs

    Minister Shanmugam was very clear during his speech in Parliament recently. Singapore will not tolerate religious preaching’s that encourages violence.

    Singapore racial and religious harmony is fragile, but precious.

    This comment came after a truncated video clip was uploaded on FB, showing an Imam allegedly reciting verses of the Quran which is hateful towards the Jews and the Christians.

    The imam used the Arabic word “fanswurna” – which means “to overcome” or “to grant victory over” – when he spoke about Christians and Jews, a word the uploader said was problematic when used in relation to other religions.

    There was some major pushback from the community, after the Minister made those comments, particularly because, the community knew the person who uploaded the video had a malicious agenda, and rejects mainstream Islam.

    You can read all about it here and here

    Mufti Fatris Bakaram was in a tough spot. He is an extremely important community resource for Muslims.

    He knew, the nuances in those verses, just like the many others in the community. It’s a verse found in many passages in the Quran and Muslims all over the world commonly read as du’a (supplication) in their daily prayers.

    Of course, religious texts must never be used to justify violence, discrimination, etc. But how do you tell people that they cannot read the meaning literally?

    In today’s context, it is not enough to be a praticing Muslim, society expect them to be able to articulate their faith and practice well, and assure people that they  are not radicals, fundamentalist, etc.

    The Mufti knew we can’t just reject the verses in the Quran but neither can he assure Singaporeans that people will not misunderstand its meanings.

    It didn’t help that, individuals were also calling all kind of hurtful things, using abusive language against the Mufti.  Twisting his words, twisting the hearts of others.

    This is where the wisdom of the Mufti came through.

    In a time where people were quick to publish their thoughts and comments on FB to defend the Imam and to confront Terence, Mufti did what others should have done in the first place.

    He paused and took a step back, to reflect.

    He then suspended his FB account and went offline for a day.

    He is only human, of course he gets angry and emotive, but he let the insults continue. Why add fuel to fire? Why reason when the heart is clouded with emotions?

    He guarded his tongue, when it was easier to use his position, and knowledge to put down the detractors.

    When people realised that he had gone offline, they speculated that perhaps the police had brought him in too, for questioning.

    Many came forth, humbly offering their explanation, and reassuring the community that there is no need for such divisiveness, or to confront Terence.

    Let him be, they said.

    The Mufti returned online today.

    He did not use harsh words to condemn anyone and his post was so soothing to read (in Malay) that I am sure, it calmed the fire, in many people hearts.

    He humbly explained that, the issue had been blown out of proportion, that Singaporean Muslims have to be steadfast in their beliefs, reject using Islam and the Quran to justify aggression, and to be aware of the climate that we live in, to always be careful and to uphold the good name of Islam and the Muslim community.

    He even stopped short of apologising, for the worry he caused when he went offline.

    Such humility. Such etiquette from the Mufti of Singapore.

    He made us feel so embarrassed, for jumping to conclusions.

    Tuan Mufti, Singaporeans still have a lot more to learn about managing diversity, if only, we could all be a bit more like you.

     

    Source: ThoughtsSG

  • Commentary: Supplication Has Been Commonly Recited In Mosques Here For Many Many Years

    Commentary: Supplication Has Been Commonly Recited In Mosques Here For Many Many Years

    Someone shared this on Facebook:

     

    “Dear Sir.

    I spent 10 years in a local madrasah system where I studied Arabic as a language and learnt Islamic religious subjects also in Arabic. Following that, I went on to do a part-time diploma in Qur’an and Sunnah (DPQS) at a local private institution.

    I read with shock and distress the accusations against the imam and I also watched the video that was put up as evidence. In my opinion, nowhere in the video did the imam curse at Jews or Christians (or anyone else for that matter) and at no point did he say anything offensive to incite or encourage violence against Jews or Christians. In my opinion, the accusation being made against the imam is wrong because the accuser has not captured the true meaning and usage of the key action word used in the supplication. The key action word (nasara) used in Arabic actually means ‘to help’. Some (though not so common) may translate it as ‘to grant victory’. If we look at most of the different places in which the word or a derivative of it appears in the Qur’an, it is usually translated as ‘to help’. But there is a specific nuance to it. It is to help/grant victory in a situation where the person asking for that help is in dire need of it due to being oppressed or harmed. So in this instance, the imam was asking Allah for help ONLY from those Christians or Jews who were oppressing or harming Muslims, and not ALL Christians and Jews. What the accuser did not highlight, was that the imam also asked Allah for help from bad Muslims too (those who declare that they believe in Allah but in their hearts they do not believe and they do things to harm Muslims).

    So, at no point did the imam curse Christians or Jews at all. In my opinion, there was nothing offensive. The imam was just asking Allah for help from ANY bad people who are harming any Muslims, regardless of the religion of those bad people.

    Sir, this accusation was particularly shocking to me because this supplication (or those similar to it) has been commonly recited in the different mosques here for many many years and it has never made us think that it demands us to be violent towards people of other religions. We have never been taught by our religious teachers that it should mean that Muslims need to seek victory (implying use of violence) over Jews, Christians or any other groups of people. It has always been taught to us in the manner I have explained above. Also, the idea of help or victory, does not necessarily and immediately imply violence (the accuser unfairly linked the word victory to war and crusades in his original facebook post, however, as Muslims, we believe that Allah can grant victory in many ways and it can be as simple as giving a person a better opportunity at a different area and removing him from the situation or position in which he was being oppressed or harmed).

    Having said all of this, I fully agree that encouraging violence against other religions is something that should not be tolerated or condoned at all in Singapore. We have a rare, precious, peaceful environment here where people of all races and religions have been living harmoniously, and as a Singaporean, it is something I really appreciate and value. If the imam was truly trying to encourage violence against Jews and Christians, then I hope appropriate action will be taken against him. However, I hope that in the future, if there were to be such cases, proper measures or steps could be put in place to prevent the accuser from spreading his unverified accusations on social media causing unwarranted fear or panic from people especially because this accusation is a sensitive issue in multi-religious Singapore.”

    <by Dinah Aziz* to Minister K Shanmugam taken from his FB page>

    Edit: *She’s a daughter of a good friend and is working her way to be a hafiz of the Quran. She has completed her hafazan but has yet to be tested in one sitting and certified as a Hafiz. But to me, certified or not, she’s already a hafiz. She has not posted this on her own FB page but I’m sharing what she’s posted because it’s useful for everyone to know the details of the video.

     

    Source:Effendi Basri

  • Shanmugam: I Find That Very Saddening – Kurang Ajar

    Shanmugam: I Find That Very Saddening – Kurang Ajar

    I gave the following statement to Berita Harian, in response to questions from them:

    ======================
    I am very heartened that MUIS and Muslim leaders have come out clearly to state their position. The statements show clearly that the Muslim community strongly values our commitment to religious harmony in Singapore. This shows the spirit of multi-racial, multi-religious harmony in Singapore. It is a very heart-warming move, and majority of Singaporeans will both be reassured, and also welcome these statements.

    MUIS and the office of the Mufti are important institutions, which play a critical role in contributing to the maintenance of religious harmony, as well as building inter-faith relations with other religious groups. Regrettably some people have been attacking them – both now and previously .

    The Mufti himself has been attacked, in rude and unacceptable language.

    Just because these people may not agree with the Mufti, or the Islamic authorities, does not mean they should use rude and abusive language against them. I find that very saddening – kurang ajar. We are keeping a close watch on people who do these things. If the conduct crosses over and becomes criminal, action will be taken.

    On the matter relating to the Imam, police will investigate the case thoroughly and interview all parties involved. This includes the persons who filmed and publicised the video. Whether there is a case for further action against any of the parties, will depend on the outcome of investigations. I made this clear in Parliament.

    The Government does not take sides in this issue – if anyone is found to have committed an offence, action will be taken.

    I have been specifically asked whether it was alright for the video of the Imam’s preaching to have been uploaded on social media. I know today many take it as a norm to post – the more sensational, the more it’s likely to multiply its reach.

    The right thing to do though, is that when a matter like this is encountered, it should be reported to the Police, and not put out on social media. That will allow police to focus their investigations on the subject of the complaint.

    If instead, the matter is publicly posted, it could lead to a ground swell of feelings, in this case, both from Muslims as well as non-Muslims. It could cause confusion about religion, and increase tensions and so on. We don’t want that in Singapore.

     

    Source: K Shanmugam Sc

deneme bonusu