Tag: Islam

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Racial Harmony Here An Unusual And Unnatural State Of Affairs, Need To Be Worked On Continuously

    Lee Hsien Loong: Racial Harmony Here An Unusual And Unnatural State Of Affairs, Need To Be Worked On Continuously

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Singaporeans of all races and religions are able to live peacefully side by side despite the fact that the country’s racial and religious harmony is an “unusual and unnatural state of affairs”.

    Mr Lee spoke at a Harmony Dinner at the Singapore Expo on Wednesday evening (Apr 15), an event organised by the Taoist Federation to celebrate its Silver Jubilee.

    “There are studies of different societies and there was one study called a report on ‘Global Religious Diversity’ looking at how mixed different societies were – and in fact they ranked Singapore as the most religious diverse society out of 232 countries in the world, and we were the most religiously diverse,” said Mr Lee.

    “The most different religions, the most intermingled, all the world’s major faiths are present in Singapore and many smaller faiths too. And yet we enjoy racial and religious harmony, and we live peacefully and happily side by side every day,” added the Prime Minister. It is something that should be continually worked on to be preserved, he said.

    Mr Lee said building a multi-racial and multi-religious society is a key ideal that Singapore was founded upon.

    Quoting the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, the Prime Minister said Singapore does not belong to any single community, but to everyone. Mr Lee said the Taoist Federation worked hard to foster good relations between the different religious groups in Singapore.

    All 10 constituent religions of the Inter-Religious Organisation (IRO) were also present at the Harmony Dinner, and Mr Lee called on the religious leaders to lead by example.

    Said Mr Lee: “Your communities look to you as role models. How you counsel and lead your congregations, your flocks, will shape religious relations in Singapore. So I am very happy that so many of our religious leaders are committed to building trust and friendships with other communities.”

    “We also of course need to keep our society open and inclusive. We can be any race, any religion, but we are also – at the same time – all Singaporeans together. And we have learnt to trust and respect our different races and religions, and to live peacefully with one another,” he said.

    The IRO said racial and religious harmony is also enhanced by having more dialogues between people of various faiths.

    “It is educating everyone as to what another religion has and if you have better understanding of another religion besides your own, that’s when you have a better understanding and that’s where you will have peace and harmony,” said IRO President Gurmit Singh.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • More Than 40 Singaporeans Choose To Remain In Yemen, Urged To Exercise Personal Responsibility

    More Than 40 Singaporeans Choose To Remain In Yemen, Urged To Exercise Personal Responsibility

    Foreign Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam today (April 15) called on more than 40 Singaporeans who are still living in war-torn Yemen to uphold “personal responsibility” by leaving the country immediately.

    Speaking to the media today, he said: “The Government has a duty to try and help our citizens in situations like this. At the same time, people also have an individual, personal responsibility not to put themselves at risk.”

    Despite “obvious risks” due to the increased fighting in Yemen and advisories issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), some have not heeded calls to leave, he added.

    Drawing a parallel with the situation in Syria, Mr Shanmugam said: “Again, despite many advisories, some of our people did not leave Syria in time, and then they found that all the escape routes were cut off and leaving Syria became extremely difficult.”

    Syria has been grappling with a civil war since 2011.

    “So really, those who are (in Yemen) should leave immediately and if they don’t, they are putting themselves at serious risk. We will then be operating in a situation where our own ability to rescue them becomes very limited,” he added.

    Tensions between Houthi rebels and forces loyal to President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi have escalated since the Houthis took control of Yemen’s capital Sana’a in September last year, five days after MFA issued the first advisory for Singaporeans to leave Yemen.

    Since last month, a Saudi Arabia-led coalition has been targeting the Houthis and their allies—namely forces loyal to former Yemeni leader Ali Abdulla Saleh— in a series of air strikes.

    Despite the MFA’s multiple appeals, more than 40 Singaporeans, including students, businessmen, homemakers and several young children, are still living in various Yemeni cities.

    “We won’t know the full number, but that is our estimate,” said Mr Shanmugam.

    TODAY understands that many have remained due to business and education obligations. Some, such as Mr Haykal Bafana, 43, told TODAY that he had lived through similar unrest in 2011.

    As Singapore does not have an embassy in Yemen, it seeks assistance from other countries such as China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia and Oman, said Mr Shanmugam.

    However, many embassies on the ground are winding down rescue operations, he noted, which “limits (the Government’s) ability to do much in Yemen any further”.

    A total of 25 Singaporeans have left Yemen in the last two weeks, including a woman who was evacuated yesterday.

    As air travel in Yemen has ceased, current rescue operations are primarily conducted over land, and can take up more than 20 hours through rough terrain.

    TODAY understands that the Singaporeans who managed to get out of Yemen also encountered challenges such as 10-hour bus delays and the lack of travel documents.

    MFA's Evacuation Efforts In Yemen

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • MIlitan Perguna Ideologi Salafi Untuk Tujuan Ganas

    MIlitan Perguna Ideologi Salafi Untuk Tujuan Ganas

    Selepas peristiwa serangan ganas 9/11 di Amerika Syarikat, istilah Salafi telah menarik perhatian ramai.

    Salafi telah dipersalahkan sebagai sebuah ideologi yang menyokong keganasan dan pengganas.

    Sejak itu, sebilangan penulis Barat dan media gagal mengetengahkan analisis yang seimbang dan tetap bagi istilah Salafi: dengan hanya menyebarkan perspektif negatif dan condong.

    Sebenarnya Salafi amat disalah anggap oleh kerana sifatnya yang agak kabur.

    Ia merangkumi pelbagai pemahaman yang termasuk keganasan dan keamanan.

    Oleh itu, usaha-usaha memberikan pengertian menyeluruh yang dapat diterima daripada istilah Salafi telah menjadi sesuatu yang amat sukar oleh para ulama.

    Soalan penting bagi siapakah atau apakah yang layak digelar sebagai golongan Salafi masih dipertikaikan.

    Namun perlu ditekankan bahawa istilah Salafi berasal daripada tradisi Islam.

    Salafi dari segi asalnya hanyalah salah satu daripada berbagai-bagai pemahaman Islam.

    Namun, penting ditekankan bahawa istilah Salafi telah melalui pelbagai pemahaman dari masa ke masa, dan penting bagi kita memahami makna Salaf dan Salafi dari segi dasar, sejarah dan konteksnya.

    APAKAH SALAFI DAN SIAPAKAH SALAF?

    Salafi atau Salafiyyah berasal daripada istilah ‘Salaf’.

    Salaf dalam bahasa Arab bermaksud “yang telah berlalu” (salafa). Dalam bahasa Arab, orang yang telah mendahului nenek moyang kita dianggap seorang salaf.

    Al-Quran juga menggunakan perkataan ‘salaf’ dalam hal ini.

    “Dan Kami jadikan mereka orang-orang yang telah lalu (salafan) sebagai contoh bagi zaman kemudian,” (Quran 43:56).

    Dari sudut Islam, istilah Salaf itu merujuk kepada umat Islam dari zaman awal, yang juga sahabat kepada Nabi Muhammad saw, orang yang mengikuti mereka dan para ulama daripada tiga generasi pertama umat Islam.

    Umat Islam zaman awal ini dikenali sebagai Salaf Al-Shalih dan mereka menikmati status istimewa dalam kalangan umat Islam seperti yang disebut oleh Nabi Muhammad saw: “Sebaik-baik umat adalah generasiku, kemudian sesudahnya, kemudian sesudahnya.”

    Pastinya, disebabkan mereka dekat kepada zaman Nabi saw, bermakna mereka juga lebih dekat kepada ajaran Islam yang asal.

    Para sahabat Nabi saw menerima pengajaran langsung daripada Rasulullah saw dan dapat menyaksikan kedua-dua wahyu dan juga konteks penurunannya, manakala dua generasi berikutnya menerima ajaran Islam menurut tafsiran para sahabat.

    Salafiyyah dikenali sebagai manhaj (metodologi) atau amalan para golongan Salafi.

    Dalam konteks moden, istilah Salafi merujuk kepada pengamal Salafiyyah.

    Dari segi bahasa, istilah Salafi ini adalah satu anggapan ulama Salaf. Salafi adalah seorang yang mengamalkan ajaran Salaf.

    Oleh itu, apabila seseorang mengaku dirinya sebagai seorang Salafi, ia bermaksud bahawa beliau mengamal dan mengikuti ajaran Salaf.

    SALAFI MODEN DAN CABANG-CABANGNYA

    Istilah “Salafi Moden” merujuk kepada kecenderungan agamanya kepada sesebuah idea atau identiti.

    Identiti di sini bermaksud sesuatu sistem kepercayaan (ideologi), idea, moral, kepentingan sosial, politik dan komitmen Salafi Moden.

    Ia juga merupakan sebuah ideologi yang menentukan bagaimana dunia dan sistemnya harus berfungsi.

    Ajaran tersebut berdasarkan ajaran daripada Al-Quran, Sunah (hadis) dan amalan generasi awal Islam (Salaf).

    Oleh kerana mereka mengikuti ajaran Salaf, maka mereka menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai individu daripada golongan Salafi.

    Salafi Moden dilihat sebagai seorang individu yang berusaha mahu penyuburan semula warisan sejarah Nabi Muhammad saw, para sahabat beliau dan generasi awal Islam dengan mengamalkan ajaran pada zaman silam kepada masa kini.

    Salafi Moden bermacam: ia terdiri daripada pelbagai elemen dan orientasi – ada yang sederhana dan ada juga yang digelar ekstrem (pengganas).

    Walaupun kebanyakan Salafi sebulat suara dalam hal akidah dan iman, mereka berbeza pendapat mengenai isu-isu perundangan dan politik.

    Ulama Islam, Abdullah Saeed, membahagikan mereka kepada empat golongan – Salafi Moden, Salafi Islam, Salafi Tegar dan Salafi Militan.

    Salafi Moden merujuk kepada idea-idea yang muncul daripada penghujung abad ke-19 di Mesir dan Damsyik sebagai reaksi kepada kelaziman idea-idea Eropah dan berusaha menerangkan kesan positif dan negatif terhadap tamadun Islam.

    Golongan Salafi ini dikaitkan dengan Muhammad Abduh.

    Beliau berasal daripada pertengahan abad ke-19 di Mesir dan menyaksikan tempoh pengaruhan Barat ke atas Timur Tengah.

    Beliau percaya bahawa pengaruh itu menjejas masyarakat Islam yang senantiasa meniru membabi buta cara-cara Barat lalu menyebabkan keruntuhan moral dan kemunduran di kebanyakan masyarakat Islam.

    Bersama dengan reformis yang lain di zamannya, iaitu Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, Muhammad Rashid Rida, Muhammad al-Shawkani dan Jalal al-San’ani, mereka mencadangkan bahawa penyelesaian terletak dalam pengkajian sumber asal agama.

    Ini termasuk, selain daripada Al-Quran dan Sunah, pematuhan kepada amalan Salaf Al-Shalih itu.

    Bagaimanapun, para reformis awal ini berpendapat bahawa orang Islam tidak seharusnya memisahkan diri mereka sepenuhnya daripada dunia Barat.

    Malah, mereka mengalu-alukan reformasi Islam yang mentafsirkan sumber-sumber awal Islam sambil bersaing dengan cara-cara kehidupan moden.

    PERBEZAAN: SALAFI ISLAM, SALAFI TEGAR DAN SALAFI JIHAD

    Salafi Islam kadangkala dikenali sebagai Salafi Politik, menekankan penerapan pemahaman Salafi di arena politik.

    Contohnya kumpulan Persaudaraan Islam dan Hizb Al Parti Ummah di Mesir.

    Salafi Tegar lazimnya dikaitkan dengan Arab Saudi dan dipercayai telah ditubuhkan oleh Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahhab.

    Ia adalah jenis Salafi yang lebih tradisional di mana penganutnya mengamalkan cara-cara Islam yang tegas dan selalunya tidak boleh bertolak ansur.

    Salafi ini merujuk kepada Ibn Taimiyah (1263-1328) dan bukan para ulama abad ke-19 seperti Muhammad Abduh, Al-Afghani dan Rashid Rida.

    Akhirnya Salafi Militan, yang juga dikenali sebagai Salafi Jihad.

    Golongan ini cenderung kepada aksi militan yang berhujah bahawa konteks semasa memerlukan keganasan dan revolusi.

    Fahaman ini dikaitkan dengan Osama Bin Laden dan Ayman Al-Zawahiri.

    Golongan-golongan Salafi yang berbeza ini sentiasa merujuk kepada ulama-ulama mereka yang berlainan fahaman sebagai rujukan agama demi kesahihan dan bimbingan.

    Tafsiran agama yang berbeza mempunyai implikasi yang mendalam terhadap politik, sosial dan ekonomi mereka.

    Perselisihan dan pertikaian sesama golongan ini adalah jelas.

    Bolehkah seorang Muslim mendengar muzik?

    Patutkah seorang Muslim menahan diri daripada membeli barangan dan produk Israel?

    Haruskah seorang Muslim berjuang menjatuhkan kerajaan Islam yang gagal melaksanakan syariah sepenuhnya?

    Setiap golangan Salafi mempunyai jawapan dan nasihat yang berbeza bagi penganutnya untuk soalan- soalan tersebut dan yang lain-lain.

    Kategori Salafi Moden yang disebutkan di atas adalah pada permukaan sahaja.

    Ia hanyalah suatu anggaran atau tanggapan untuk membantu kita agar lebih memahami dengan mendalam mengenai trend ideologi Salafi Moden.

    Perbezaan di antara golongan itu menjejas sesetengah golongan Salafi yang juga bersifat aman dalam kalangan majoriti yang membentuk Salafi Moden.

    • Ustaz Dr Mohamed Ali, Penulis Penolong Profesor, Sekolah Pengajian Antarabangsa S. Rajaratnam (RSIS), Universiti Teknologi Nanyang.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Are You A True Blue Anak Melayu?

    Are You A True Blue Anak Melayu?

    ‘You Malay or Indian?’

    ‘Mmm… .’ I hesitated. ‘Malay. Yeah, I’m a Malay.’
    ‘Oh! You know what… We actually offer financial aid for needy students to go for this overseas internship programme and …’

    The rest of what was supposed to be the essential information that I needed dissolved into slurred words and irrelevancy. I smiled sheepishly at the international coordinator and walked away as if the aid was the only thing I cared about, simultaneously giving him the satisfaction of realising his own benevolence.

    Perhaps to him, I was just another Malay student who had decided to give up on an opportunity simply because I could not afford it. So typical.

    Not to say that I did not need that financial aid. After all, a nine thousand USD fee is an exorbitant amount for a three-month internship in the Big Apple. But why should the subject of financial aid be associated with me so purposefully, and almost explicitly? That was a rhetorical question.

    I am a Malay. That is why.*

    I was born into an average middle-class Singaporean Malay family, which means to say we have enough on the table to fill everyone in the household but flinch at the thought of going on a vacation to Europe.

    We are Malay because the government says so. Who cares if my mum is a Malayali, or if my dad is half-Chinese? My paternal grandfather is a true-blue, pure-blooded son of the Nusantara. Hence by the power vested in the government, his descendants and all who marry into the family shall be identified as a Malay for the sake of the country’s administration. My grandfather is, therefore my father is. My father is, therefore I am. This patriarchal system and the hangover of colonial policies have dictated my racial identification, and the rich ethnic heritage that runs through my veins, virtually erased. The only way for my siblings and I to know about who we truly are has been through our mother’s soliloquies and occasional tirades.

    As if losing three quarters of my identity was not enough, I have to identify myself as a Malay. Where do I begin with the Malays? God forbid that if they are not locked up for a litany of crimes, they will be lepak-ing at the void decks at night with their second-hand guitars and driving dwellers in the neighbourhood up the walls – and that is just the tip of the iceberg.

    Indolent and imprudent.
    Gullible and envious.
    Non-tenacious and submissive.
    School dropouts.
    Druggies.
    Runts of the state.
    The blacks of Singapore.

    The Malays are quick to cry foul at the brutal stereotypes and labels imposed onto them but there is no smoke without fire, no? Ironically, I came to learn about my own cultural deficiencies through my own family, my Malay family.*

    ‘Dik, dengar kata Mak. Pergi sekolah jangan campur dengan budak Melayu sangat, faham? Nanti jadi pemalas dan bodoh’, my mum would occasionally remind me before I headed to school. Of course, I did not want to end up as a lazy and stupid student in such a meritorious society. I was a very ambitious child and I held on to my mother’s words of pseudo-wisdom like a shining beacon.

    So when I entered primary school, I did my best to avoid the Malay kids. My parents were right. All they ever cared about were fun and games. They did not excel in their studies, and neither were they the slightest bit penitent about their Cs and Ds grades. Bless their hearts, their parents only expected them to pass their exams. While they floundered academically, my mingling with the Chinese and Indian kids bore fruit as I rose above the noxious fumes of Malay incompetency and seamlessly made my way into the Express stream of a reputable secondary school, and later to a good junior college.

    But at what cost?

    My refusal to associate myself with the Malay race had turned myself into a snob and a faux-elite. Despite being fluent in the Malay language, I pretended to be atrocious at it by faking a ghastly foreign accent when speaking in my mother tongue. I called myself half-Indian all the time and begrudgingly revealed my Malay side only after being questioned about this other half.

    ‘Oh… Melayu la…’, they would chime afterwards while I heaved a concurring sigh.
    After years of playing charades, I was finally confronted by my own hypocrisy when I entered junior college (the Singaporean equivalent of a high school). I had thought all along that I was one of the very few outstanding and worthy Malays. But as an apparent blow to my hubris, there were in fact many more like me. They were ambitious, driven, and intelligent. In fact, they were also good in mathematics, contrary to the popular belief that Malays are beyond hope when it comes to the art of numbers — something that I regrettably reinforce. Their merit was hard for me to fathom, let alone to accept. Never mind their academic excellence, they also possessed something I had never had: the potent ethnic essence and identity.

    The evading games that I played with my racial identity throughout my formative years had stripped me of the very essence of my cultural background. The absence of Malay friends in my life left me without any knowledge of the glitter and gold of Malay culture, history, and traditions. I knew nothing about adat or tata tertib. I did not know about the glorious kampung spirit, keikhlasan, and kehormatan, the noble and rich attributes that the Malays take very seriously. I used to scoff at the Malay kids in school for wasting their time — as if they cared — dancing for the Malay traditional dance club and joining the Dikir Barat, without realising the splendour behind such exquisite Asian art forms. Yet the Malays I met at junior college displayed and carried these very attributes with such gusto and pride, despite their apparent modern outlook and zest. I was baffled by this, but it was not so much about how they managed to live with the best of both worlds – rather, it was about my inadequacies. Surrounding myself with the Chinese and Indians taught me a thing or two about their respective cultures, but it was never exhaustive enough to turn me into either one of them. Engulfing myself with Western literature and pop culture did not do me any good either. I can never be like the Chinese or the Indians or the Caucasians. I cannot be them. I am not them.

    Now, whether I can even be considered a Malay is also debatable.

    *

    ‘Are you Malay? Why do you speak like that?’, my Malay language classmate asked.
    ‘Kind of… I am half-Indian. I’m just not very good with the language.’ I lied, again.
    ‘Oh. So you are one of those Westernised lupa daratan la. What? Is it really that lowly to be a Malay?’. The annoyance in her voice grew.

    Lupa daratan is a Malay expression for someone who has lost his or her roots. I was an epitome of that.

    She was an intelligent one, and very ethnic at that. How was that even possible? Had my entire life hitherto been a lie? Why weren’t the Malay kids here the same as those shoddy ones who I had met during my primary school days?

    I started hanging out with them. It wasn’t long before I realised that the Malay kids were not any different from the Chinese and Indian kids who I had hanged out with during my childhood and early teenage days. Lo and behold, the only difference among them was the race categorisation stamped in black and white on their identity cards. My hanging out with the Malay kids in junior college did not transform me into a ‘folk devil’. My school work did not deteriorate and my academic results did not falter. Nothing was compromised or lost. Instead, I regained what I had taken for granted and intentionally disassociated myself from all this while — my Malay essence.

    It was also through my social interactions with my fellow Malays that I came to realise the caustic effects of oblivion, nonchalance, and blind acceptance. Stereotypes are essentially categorisations born out of ignorance. There is no truth in stereotypes and there is no truth in the cultural deficiency theory. Cultural deficiency is not relative but it is absolute. The Malay race may or may not be culturally deficient, depending on what the Malay community makes out of its own existence. I used to be culturally deficient not because of the fact that I am a Malay, but because I refused to identify myself as a Malay. As a consequence, I had ended up in a no man’s land. I am half-Indian but I am not Indian enough. I have Chinese blood in me but I am not Chinese enough. I am a Malay but I shunned it to avoid being inferior.

    Jack of all identities, master of none. Who am I?

    Today, my racial identity is no longer an issue to me in spite of my physical ambiguity. I draw strength from my perceived weakness as a Malay to debunk the many myths about my race. Being Malay empowers me to prove to society that a Malay son is more than capable to achieve or even surpass the deeds of the sons of the other races, and that no stereotype or label has a hold on me or on my race. What was a source of shame for me has become my pride and a perennial, underlying strength. Realising and accepting myself as an Anak Melayu has simply made me a sturdier and resilient person in undergoing life’s endless road-bumps, providing me with the valour to take up terrifying challenges. It has also become my driving force in propelling myself with conviction to strive and thrive in a meritorious and racially-attentive society. It is also with that realisation that I will always place my racial identity on the highest of pedestals and that it will always be my fortitude. My racial identity is my pride, and I hope that one day I can in return be its pride.*

    ‘So, it says here you are biracial? What makes up ‘Zaidani’ then?’, the interviewer looked at me inquisitively.
    ‘Essentially, a Malay.’ I answered.
    Takkan Melayu hilang di dunia. Never will the Malays vanish from earth.

    Zai Dani is an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore and he is currently doing his honours year. His tagline has always been, ‘Spread legs, not war’ but people always ask for more. He wonders why.

     

    Source: http://entitledmag.com

  • Walid J Abdullah: Media Should Stop Reinforcing Stereotypes In Hailing Formal Progress

    Walid J Abdullah: Media Should Stop Reinforcing Stereotypes In Hailing Formal Progress

    I congratulate Encik Masagos Zulkifli on his promotion. The issue of ‘one Muslim minister per cabinet’ has been brought up many times (i myself have talked to my MP about this), and credit where it is due, today there is change in this regard. I pray that he will be given strength and wisdom to discharge his responsibilities in the best of ways.

    At the same time, i hope that our local newspapers will stop using phrases like ‘this marks the coming of age of Malay politicians’. Whether they realize it or not, such statements are really condescending.

    For there to be true multi-racialism, formal progress (such as political appointments) must not be hampered by informal structures (such as ethnic stereotypes). Our media would do well to stop perpetuating – directly or indirectly – the myth of the lazy native and the ‘incompetent Malay’ stereotype.

    Hopefully this is a start to greater things, and God-willing, one day we will even have a Minister of Defence or Finance who is Muslim.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

deneme bonusu