Tag: Lee Hsien Loong

  • Chee Soon Juan: I Call Upon Lee Hsien Loong To Lead With Courage And Wisdom In  Amos Yee Saga

    Chee Soon Juan: I Call Upon Lee Hsien Loong To Lead With Courage And Wisdom In Amos Yee Saga

    Mr Amos Yee’s video and his prosecution has grabbed the attention of Singaporeans, evoking strong emotions among many people.

    Amos’ remarks must have hurt PM Lee Hsien Loong deeply. After all, Lee Kuan Yew was the PM’s father and no one enjoys having their loved ones criticised, especially at a time when one is still grieving and in the manner in which it was done. Amos’ video was offensive and ill-advised.

    But this is where we need leadership to come through. Mr Lee is not an ordinary citizen. He is the leader of the country. Difficult as it may be, he must separate his personal feelings from his public ones.

    Clearly, there are laws that empower the state to prosecute the teenager. But life’s lessons impart to us that just because we can, it doesn’t mean that we should.

    Amos, as it has been repeatedly pointed out, is still a teenager and as teenagers go, so goes all the emotional complexities that adolescence brings.

    As parents, we must seek to influence and mould rather than proscribe and punish. Our instinct must be to coax the best out of our children whatever their talents and frailties. As leaders, should we act any differently towards our youths?

    From his Facebook posts, Amos seems to be undergoing a complex time in his development. He is undoubtedly endowed with exceptional talent. We should also recognise that he is not a hardened, let alone common, criminal deserving of shackles and imprisonment. For all his precociousness, he is still a child who needs guidance.

    Given the situation, the state should provide Amos and his parents assistance rather than make life more difficult for them.

    In the bigger picture, how we deal with youths like Amos – and there is a rapidly growing number among the younger generation who are frustrated with the current political system – will determine how we progress as a nation.

    If all we are intent on is to shut our youths up by prosecuting and imprisoning them, then we are creating a dangerous situation for ourselves. We will rue the missed opportunity to bring them into public process and harness their intellect and exuberance if we hope to progress.

    It is imperative that this Government deals with the emerging situation with greater sophistication than it has demomstrated thus far. To do this, we need more discussion and nuanced conversation, not prosecution.

    As for Amos’ comments on Christianity, there are many in the SDP who are Christians and we are not offended by the video. Neither do we wish to see Amos prosecuted for his views – our faiths are not so shallow as to punish a boy for criticising it.

    It is, therefore, incomprehensible to see the state media mischievously suggest that it was the SDP who had influenced Amos to make his video. It is such kind of irresponsible journalism that causes national discord.

    If the PAP is offended by Amos’ words, then I would like to remind it that I have been called worse things, much of it by Lee Kuan Yew himself. I choose not to harbour any grudge for a burdened heart cannot truly serve the people.

    In this vein, I call on the Prime Minister to step up and lead. With courage and wisdom.

     

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan

  • Is PAP The Only Viable Option In Singapore?

    Is PAP The Only Viable Option In Singapore?

    Mr PM, please consider this.

    Many times, we have been repeatedly told that PAP is the only and viable option? Question is how believable is this today??

    In order to put this question to rest, an objective approach substantiated by hard facts and plain and transparent logic may help the good citizens to decide for themselves.

    Let us score PAP’s performance against the fundamentals that concern all Singaporeans.

    1 Integrity and Meritocracy are sacred principles in Singapore never to be compromised. This is the branding of Singapore.

    Integrity – IDA fake degree, Witchhunt on Aljunied TC vs PAP TCs – Aimgate, Jurong TC where PAP grassroots leader is TC GM is supplier GM, Lehman Brothers in PAP TCs, Sengkang saga with HDB and MND, Nee Soon MP company is TC supplier, lawyer MP overcharging by 1M….

    Meritocracy – this is easiest to debunk. SMRT!!!!, Youth Olympics, MP Intan endorsing cheat Yang Yin, IDA employing fake degree person, Jurong TC just cannot keep rats and bugs away, Tanjong Pagar visit by MP once in 5 years according to a TP resident, family, relatives and crony network ….

    2 The application of the Rule of Law is to be administered equally to all in Singapore, no exceptions and discretion.

    SPF, AGC on RN, HHH, Ravi, Amos Yee, LTA parking violation exception, Ello, the twins of PAP Jasons…..

    3 The job market available to Singaporeans must be fair in terms of total cost to employ, no unfair hiring practices, need for credible qualifications and adequate labor protection for all.

    Government opening doors even wider to all Asean citizens, of which 80% indicated they want to work in Singapore. 80% of the working population of Asean population!!!! If you think today is bad, just wait till 2016 when this horror is unleashed on Singaporeans by the our government.

    The fake degrees and millions of third world cheap labor will descend like swarms to attack our jobs, your families, destroy our Society. Then, even our 70 year old senior citizens will have competition in cleaning tables at hawker centers and selling tissues. Already happening today!

    4 CPF / Medishield… is our money and for our retirement use at age 55.

    No need to say more. You must be blind if you do not know whats happening here. This is the greatest perversion of trust.

    5 Accessibility to affordable, efficient and effective Healthcare, Education, Social Welfare, Transportation are basic requirements to be made available to citizens.

    What do you think of our glorious SMRT? What the hospital availability? What about the numerous obstacles to getting welfare aid. How about the millions of dollars of scholarships given to foreigners whilst our children are struggling with education loans.

    6 Accountability and transparency of Government to the people.

    CPF, GIC, Temasek, Healthcare, SMRT, Grassroots organization and PA….

    Now that we have reviewed the performance of PAP, then do scoring.

    1. Scoring the card will produce some rather obvious conclusions.
    2. Then you will ask yourself, ‘If we do not vote PAP, then vote for who?’
    3. Then the obvious question dawn on you. ‘What is the contribution of these people in government so far. Nothing or worse, negatives? Why do we have to pay million dollars for this kind of results??????”
    4. The next obvious question, ‘You mean NOBODY can do better than this???????????????’
    5. Suddenly incredulous enlightenment happens. ‘Actually anybody can do better than this’
    6. Further light shines brighter. ‘ And Cheaper too’

    I exaggerate you not here. The conclusion is made simple and straightforward because the current government, infested with half dimwit under talents whose only talents is sucking up, has made it so easy to flush their flaws and misdeeds for all to see.

    Most damning of all, the neutered leadership have chosen if not silence, then equally appalling moronic and twisted logic as their incriminating defense.

    Spencer Goh

    * Comment appeared in TRE article: PM: Next GE about forming new leaders to lead SG

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Singapore And Malaysia PMs Attend Leaders’ Retreat Here

    Singapore And Malaysia PMs Attend Leaders’ Retreat Here

    Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak will be in Singapore on Monday and Tuesday for a leaders’ retreat with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

    The regular meetings between the premiers have yielded major agreements in recent years, including an ambitious high-speed rail link that will slash travel time between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore to just 90 minutes by 2020.

    The agenda this year, which also marks the 50th anniversary of Singapore-Malaysia ties, is likely to include further discussions on the project, which was first announced during the 2013 retreat.

    Singapore has said it will announce the location of its high- speed rail terminal at this retreat. Three sites have been shortlisted – Jurong East, Tuas West and the city centre.

    PM Lee said last week when he officiated at the opening of the new chancery of the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur: “If we can get the high-speed rail going and running, this will be a very important project which will foster closer ties between our people.

    “And then we can come up, have lunch and go back down to Singapore again.”

    Malaysia is siting its terminus within the Bandar Malaysia project, which will transform the old Sungei Besi area – 3km from Kuala Lumpur’s financial district – into a dynamic, connected township.

    The leaders’ retreat, which has been held annually since 2012, is regarded by both countries as a sign of the strong rapport between the two leaders.

    “The annual leaders’ retreat is a key bilateral platform for the Prime Ministers to drive relations forward,” said Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement.

    PM Najib and his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, will be hosted to a private dinner by PM Lee and Mrs Lee on Monday.

    On Tuesday, the two premiers and their respective delegations will meet for bilateral talks, and will discuss ways to further enhance cooperation across a wide range of areas.

    PM Najib will also deliver a keynote address on Tuesday night at the Economic Society of Singapore’s annual dinner at the Shangri-La Hotel, which PM Lee will be attending.

    During the retreat, PM Lee will be accompanied by Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who is also Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs.

    The Singapore delegation includes Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang; Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim; Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan; Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen; Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan; Minister for Foreign Affairs and Law K Shanmugam; Minister for Transport and Lui Tuck Yew; Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Lawrence Wong; and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Masagos Zulkifli.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Lee Hsien Loong Gets All Clear For Prostate Cancer

    Lee Hsien Loong Gets All Clear For Prostate Cancer

    Doctors have given Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong the all-clear for prostate cancer, following a blood test two weeks ago.

    The test was done two months after Mr Lee underwent keyhole surgery in February for early-stage prostate cancer, which was discovered through a regular check-up. Doctors have said he has a 98 per cent chance of not dying from prostate cancer after 15 years, the Prime Minister said yesterday at the May Day Rally.

    But other health issues could crop up, Mr Lee said. Ill health could also affect other members of the Cabinet, weakening the team, he said.

    “Just because you are a minister does not mean you’re Superman. It doesn’t mean you won’t get ill, it doesn’t mean you don’t grow old,” he said. “If I lose any of them, my team will be weaker. Can I replace them quickly with people of the same quality and experience?”

    The current Cabinet is “balanced”, with some experienced ministers and newer ones who joined after the 2011 General Election, but Mr Lee, 63, said his job is also to build a strong leadership team for the future.

    “We will all grow old and we all need successors,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Kenneth Jeyaretnam: Why A By-Election Should Be Called In Tanjong Pagar

    Kenneth Jeyaretnam: Why A By-Election Should Be Called In Tanjong Pagar

    The death of Lee Kuan Yew leaves his seat in Tanjong Pagar GRC vacant.  Recently a Bloomberg journalist asked me to comment on the suggestion that  Lee’s seat in Tanjong Pagar be left vacant as a mark of respect. Her resultant article can be read here.  Some commentators have suggested that the Opposition should boycott any by-election, giving the PAP a walkover similar to the ones it has enjoyed ever since Lee Kuan Yew’s constituency was included as part of Tanjong Pagar GRC.  In addition a lot of people have been asking me whether I think a by-election will or even must be called.

    The fact that any one could even suggest that denying the democratic rights of the citizens of one ward to choose their representative is a way to show respect for the founder of our one-party authoritarian system goes a long way to explaining how far from being a democracy that system is and how far we have to go to become a developed nation in terms of our political and legal structures.

    LKY’s seat had of course been effectively vacant for some time. For many years other MPs in the GRC had performed his constituency duties. Ill-health and advanced years also meant that his appearances in Parliament after his unopposed re-election in 2011 were mostly perfunctory.  In a democracy an MP who was incapacitated by advanced years or ill-health would have resigned to allow a new and fitter incumbent to perform the duties that he was no longer able to.

    In addition because of LKY’s deliberate creation and reinforcement of a climate of fear, and the very real measures he took to crush anyone who stood up to him, the voters of his GRC have been denied the right to choose their representatives for several decades. Even in 2011, when every other seat was contested and our aim was to see Singapore’s first non-walkover GE , a team of independents ran out of time in filing their nomination papers and were disqualified.  The fact that the people of that ward have gone without choosing their representatives for so long means that there is a more urgent need to hold a by-election in his constituency now. But can the PM leave the seat vacant indefinitely in defiance of every democratic norm but as has been normal PAP practice until recently?

    The short answer  and the absolute legal fact is that it would be unconstitutional not to hold a by-election unless the Prime Minister decides to call a general election within the next three months or so.

    The argument ( thanks to Article 14) runs like this.

    Article 49 of the Constitution states:

    49.

    —(1)  Whenever the seat of a Member, not being a non-constituency Member, has become vacant for any reason other than a dissolution of Parliament, the vacancy shall be filled by election in the manner provided by or under any law relating to Parliamentary elections for the time being in force.

     It was established by the Court of Appeal decision in Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v AG (2013) that the calling of a by-election is mandatory and not discretionary and that it has to be held within a reasonable space of time, normally three months.

    The Parliamentary Elections Act (PEA) seems to contradict this requirement when it states in Article 24-2(A) that:

    (2A) In respect of any group representation constituency, no writ [for a by-election] shall be issued under subsection (1) for an election to fill any vacancy unless all the Members for that constituency have vacated their seats in Parliament.

    However this places Article 24-(2A) of the PEA at odds with the Constitution. Where this is the case the Constitution clearly overrides any laws enacted by Parliament, as stated in Article 4 of the Constitution:

    1. This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic of Singapore and any law enacted by the Legislature after the commencement of this Constitution which is inconsistent with this Constitution shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.

    Article 24-(2A) of the PEA is clearly inconsistent with Article 49 of the Constitution. Therefore under Article 4 of the Constitution it is void.  Therefore the Prime Minister must call a by-election for Tanjong Pagar GRC, or at least for the constituency vacated by his father’s death, within the next three months.

    If the PM refuses to do so, I (and I know my Party members would join me) would support an application to the Court to declare that the PEA is inconsistent with the Constitution and that a by-election must be called. It should be easy for Lee Hsien Loong’s poodle, the Elections Department, to carve out Tanjong Pagar SMC from the GRC if the PM does not want to call a by-election for the whole GRC. However as it was uncontested in 2011 it would be right now to hold an election for the whole GRC.

    In the event that the PM observes the Constitution and calls a by-election, it would be good for the Opposition parties to come together and agree to field a joint “A” team against the PAP under an umbrella with all our strongest candidates combined. This would be an important step in the process of transforming the Opposition in the eyes of the electorate into a credible force that is ready to form an alternative Government.

    Screenshot 2015-04-23 13.00.44

     

     

    Source: http://sonofadud.com