Tag: PAP

  • PAP Reshuffling Grassroots Advisers in Opposition Wards

    PAP Reshuffling Grassroots Advisers in Opposition Wards

    SINGAPORE — After serving as grassroots advisers in constituencies where they lost during the General Election in 2011, Mr Ong Ye Kung and Mr Desmond Choo are leaving their positions in the opposition-held wards of Aljunied GRC and Hougang.

    The People’s Association (PA) announced today (Sept 18) that Mr Choo had been appointed second adviser to Tampines Grassroots Organisations (GROs) for Tampines East.

    Mr Ong, who has been volunteering in Sembawang GRC, relinquished his post as adviser for Kaki Bukit in Aljunied.

    Replacing them are veteran grassroots leaders Goh Chee Koh, 69, and Dr Kee Wei Heong, 64.

    Mr Goh, the honorary chairman of Punggol Central Citizens’ Consultative Committee (CCC), is now adviser to Hougang GROs, while Dr Kee, chairman of Bukit Gombak CCC, takes over from Mr Ong.

    The changes mean the positions of adviser to GROs at the two Workers’ Party-held constituencies — typically occupied by People’s Action Party (PAP) Members of Parliament or potential PAP candidates — are now almost all filled by veteran grassroots leaders.

    Apart from Dr Kee, advisors to the Aljunied GROs include Mr Anthony Loh, 75, Mr David Tay Poey Cher, 69, and Professor Brian Lee Chang Leng, 73. The fifth advisor is former Senior Minister of State (Foreign Affairs) Zainul Abidin Rasheed, 66, who was part of the PAP team that was defeated in the 2011 election.

    Political analysts TODAY spoke to said the moves are not surprising, coming in the wake of earlier appointments of grassroots veterans at Aljunied GROs. For example, Mr Loh replaced former Foreign Affairs Minister George Yeo in Bedok Reservoir—Punggol in 2012, said Institute of Policy Studies senior research fellow Gillian Koh.

    Singapore Management University law professor Eugene Tan said the PAP faces a dilemma in Aljunied and Hougang. Fielding a strong candidate with no guarantee of an electorial victory would upset the PAP’s leadership plans, he said. If a weaker candidate is fielded, voters could feel they are not taken seriously.

    The latest move also suggests that while the PAP considers Mr Choo — who also lost in the Hougang by-election in 2012 — and Mr Ong MP material, the party feels the ground in Aljunied and Hougang are not sweet enough. “The party is seeking to be realistic in electorial prospects,” said Assoc Prof Tan.

    The PAP received 57.2 and 63.9 per cent of the vote at Tampines GRC and Sembawang GRC during the last General Election. Tampines GRC and Sembawang GRC are currently helmed by Education Minister Heng Swee Keat and National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan respectively.

    At Tampines, Mr Choo will be working with Mr Mah Bow Tan — current Adviser for Tampines East. Mr Mah stepped down as Minister of National Development after the 2011 General Election. Mr Ong, meanwhile, was reportedly slated to join Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Education and Manpower Hawazi Daipi said at his Marsiling Meet-the-People Sessions.

    Asked whether the move to place Mr Ong and Mr Choo in Sembawang and Tampines was intended to ensure they stand a higher chance of getting elected into Parliament, Dr Koh said the PAP knows there is no such thing as a stronghold and each constituency has to be taken seriously. Voters have become more demanding and will scrutinise the candidates, she added.

    On whether the move would give them a better chance of getting into Parliament, Mr Choo and Mr Ong – who was both the PAP branch chairman and grassroots adviser for Kaki Bukit at one point – stressed that the announcement was made by the PA, and not by the party. The PA appointment and whether a candidate is fielded in the constituency where he is adviser are two separate matters, Mr Choo said.

    “I think the PA is quite clear about this separation. Whether I will be fielded as a candidate in Tampines, that is something that is still very much (the) party’s decision,” he added.

    When contacted, Dr Kee, who hopes to do more for seniors in Kaki Bukit, said he is not interested in becoming an MP and prefers serving residents through grassroots work. “I had predecessors who actually died on the job when they are in their 80s. Even at 80 years old, they still come and help out at functions and do their best for the community. I will be like that,” he said.

    Previous media reports have identified several chairmen of the PAP branches in Aljunied GRC as potential candidates. The next General Election is due by Jan 2017.

    http://m.todayonline.com/singapore/ong-ye-kung-desmond-choo-appointed-other-constituencies

  • Politicians Like WP Pritam Singh Shouldn’t Get Involved in Gaza Issue

    Politicians Like WP Pritam Singh Shouldn’t Get Involved in Gaza Issue

    aid for gaza charity concert_1 charity concert_2

    MP for Aljunied GRC Mr Pritam Singh recently urged the government to take a tough stand in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Prior to that, he has promoted activities that expressed support for Palestine.

    As a citizen, I am curious if Pritam Singh speaking in his personal capacity or presenting his views as a MP in Aljunied GRC?

    According to media reports, Israel and Palestine have suffered losses in the conflict.

    In August this year, in his parliamentary reply to Choa Chua Kang GRC MP Zaqy Muhammad, Minister for Foreign Affairs Mr K Shanmugam has reiterated that Singapore supports “sanctions based on international laws”.

    Israel and Palestine are eager to achieve their political objectives at the expenses of innocent civilians.

    Notwithstanding international pressure, Israel-Palestine conflict showed no signs of tapering. This matter requires intervention and resolution from international bodies. Singapore has already presented her neutral stand in the conflict and expressed views that the conflict to be resolved by international resolutions. Singapore has to be realistic since Israel and Hamas are not dependent on her.

    I am concerned with the intentions of Mr Pritam Singh because his intentions might be misconstrued in our multi-racial society, causing dividing views to arise. 

    What if Singaporeans from non-Muslim communities emulated Pritam Singh and expressed support for individual parties in unresolved international conflicts, will such actions cause tensions within Singaporeans? What has Singapore got to gain? As a small state, what is Singapore’s voice in the Israel-Palestine conflict?

    I hope MPs will be more prudent when they express views towards international relationship issues. They should have due consideration for Singapore’s multi-cultural society and comprehensively assess the message they are telling everyone.

    Source: http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/eat-drink-man-woman-16/gpgt-wp-pritam-singh-guest-honour-support-palestine-event-what-he-trying-do-4798340.html

    letters R1C

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: CONTACT RILEK1CORNER

  • Pakatan Rakyat Wants Malaysia to Reunite With  Singapore

    Pakatan Rakyat Wants Malaysia to Reunite With Singapore

    UMNO

    SEREMBAN: Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar Mohamad Hasan has alleged that Pakatan Rakyat intends to invite Singapore to rejoin Malaysia if it wins control of the Federal Government.

    Launching the Rembau Umno divisional meeting, he said: “I guarantee that three days after the opposition forms the Federal Government, it will have its first cabinet meeting, where the main agenda will be the reunion of Singapore with Malaysia.

    “This won’t need any amendment to the Federal Constitution. It needs only the approval of the Federal Cabinet, the way Tunku Abdul Rahman threw Singapore out.”

    He said one of the consequences of the reunion would be the addition of 89 seats to the Malaysian Parliament.

    “All those 89 seats would be non-Malay seats,” he added.

    “So before this happens, let’s work hard and ensure that Umno remains in power so that the dignity of the Malays is protected.”

    Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/08/26/pakatan-agenda-is-to-reunite-with-singapore/

    letters R1C

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: CONTACT RILEK1CORNER

  • 8 Signs That the PAP Is Becoming a Groupthink.

    8 Signs That the PAP Is Becoming a Groupthink.

    PAP

    What is Groupthink?

    Groupthink, a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis (1972), occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment”.  Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups.  A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making.

    Symptoms of Groupthink

    1) Illusion of invulnerability – Creates excessive optimism that encourages taking extreme risks.

    With 50 years in absolute power, and can amend the constitution at will, the PAP has the illusion of invulnerability. That explains why they can chide the voters to repent if they voted for the alternatives during 2011 election. They also take extreme risks thinking that the voters are daft and would not appreciate transparency. Case in point – Temasek, GIC and $2 company AIM.

    2) Collective rationalization – Members discount warnings and do not reconsider their assumptions.

    Many times warning signs highlighted in parliament by the alternatives were brushed aside. As long as the ideas were not from their (PAP) own members, it will be quickly shot down only for the citizens to bear the consequences later. Case in point – The riot at Little India, SBS Bus drivers’ strike.

    3) Belief in inherent morality – Members believes in the rightness of their cause and therefore ignores the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions

    We can see this symptom when the PAP makes the argument that the public is better off not knowing the value of our reserves or where all the tax-payers monies go to.  Case in point – The Casino project and YOG. They believe that their cause is a righteous one, ignoring the ethical or moral consequences of their actions.

    4) Stereotyped views of out-groups – Negative views of “enemy” make effective responses to conflict seem unnecessary.

    PAP thinks that the alternatives are out to destroy Singapore and our neighbouring countries are out to invade Singapore. This is unnecessary and usually, small conflicts were always blown out of proportion due to the fact that the PAP’s negative views of the ‘enemy’.

    5) Direct pressure on dissenters – Members are under pressure not to express arguments against any of the group’s views.

    Party whip is often applied to get members to acquiesce. Disciplinary actions will be taken against those who don’t comply. Case in point – Population 6.9 million white paper. All PAP members voted yes and those who strongly disagree had to be absent in order not to ruffle any feathers.

    6) Self-censorship – Doubts and deviations from the perceived group consensus are not expressed.

    The above is self-explanatory. Ministers will cry mother and father but at the end of it, they will say that in the best interest of the nation, they agree to whatever was being proposed. Case in point – Minister Lim Boon Heng tears on the building of the casino.

    7) Illusion of unanimity – The majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.

    Because dissenting voices within the group are curbed, they discounted the fact that many hold their peace because they want to get in the good books of the little emperor LHL.

    8) Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ – Members protect the group and the leader from information that is problematic or contradictory to the group’s cohesiveness, view, and/or decisions.

    punggolslap2

    This scenario was clearly seen as recently in the Punggol East By-Election. It was reported that the PAP grassroot had informed of the ground sentiments shifting and also PAP members were not happy by the decision to parachute an elitist candidate who did not do prior grassroot activities but was still chosen as a candidate. This information did not reach the top management. Somewhere, somehow within the hierarchy, someone see it fit not to report the problematic truth.

    Groupthink occurs when groups are highly cohesive and when they are under considerable pressure to make a quality decision. Members are less motivated to realistically appraise the alternative courses of action available to them.

    These group pressures lead to carelessness and irrational thinking since groups experiencing groupthink fail to consider all alternatives and seek to maintain unanimity.  Decisions shaped by groupthink have low probability of achieving successful outcomes.

    Thus, Singapore will sink further with the incumbent in power unless a radical change happens within PAP itself.

    Regards,

    Osman Sulaiman

    letters R1C

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: CONTACT RILEK1CORNER

  • MUIS Has ‘Grand Strategy’ To Move Society Towards Liberal Islam

    MUIS Has ‘Grand Strategy’ To Move Society Towards Liberal Islam

    Alami musa

    If I’m not mistaken, Last Sabtu morning, I saw Ambassador Alami Musa.

    We were both jogging. In opposite directions. Me towards East Coast. He was probably on his way back.

    I don’t know whether that’s a metaphor. For the way we envision the direction of the Muslim Ummah…

    Bro Alami is my Muslim brother. So I need to be careful what I say. As Muslims, we judge by what is apparent.

    And what is apparent to me was that during his tenure as MUIS head, the organisation went decidedly on a Liberal bent.

    It was a bold social experiment, probably done as a bulwark against terrorism against the backdrop of the JI arrests. There was clearly a movement to present a ‘version’ of Islam that is palatable to Liberal ideas. So a plan was established to use MUIS to push the Liberal agenda. No effort and money were spared. They got top Liberal ‘scholars’ to our shores – even Ali Asghar Engineer, the chap who coined the term Liberal Islam. Then scholars from Jaringan Liberal Islam from Indonesia was roped in, and MUIS even published a booklet filled with writings of Liberal scholars. Then Asatizahs doing their PhD were sent to a hub of Liberal Islam in Indonesia. Then MUIS came up with the 10 points for an ideal Muslim community, with ideas of secularism and pluralism being pushed. Then there was the tie-up with Hartford Seminary and sending MUIS officials there, presumably so that there can be ‘bridges of understanding’ with the seminary. Isn’t the primary function of a seminary to train Christians to do proselytization? Is there no other place to send MUIS officials?

    Then there was the watering down of the syllabus of Youth and Kids Alive. There is ittle emphasis on absolutely critical issues like classical Tawheed. Kids are taught subjects like How to be Muslim in SG. So an intelligent Muslim child goes to these part-time classes in our mosques. He is not given a strong grounding in classical Islam. He goes to university.

    And he is ripe for the picking of the Liberals that flood academia.

    We now hear that Ambassador Alami has joined the Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). And he heads a team that includes a former MUIS officical active in the Reading Group.

    It is a bold social experiment. Because it has as it’s goal to move the Muslim community towards a more Liberal stance. And this is done probably at the behest of Minister-in-charge of Muslim affairs. It is an ambitious undertaking. Because the Muslim community, no matter how much faults we have, are still ideologically very much conservative.

    Alhamdulillah. Allah azzawajal is Protecting the Aqeedah of the Muslim community here. After more than a decade of trying, the bold social experiment has failed. And failed miserably. Even the self-identified liberal Farish Noor has concluded that there is very little traction of Liberal Islam in the masses. All over SEA. Including SG.

    I write this as a sincere attempt for Ambassador Alami and others to think long and hard before carrying on with this obstinate obsession of trying to push a Liberal Islam agenda.

    Because it is causing friction within the Muslim community here. Already some MPs are voicing out their discomfort.

    And subhanallah. The recent ‪#‎wearwhite‬ episode makes it really clear that the Muslim community here is conservative. And they are crying out for true leadership in the Malay-Muslim community.

    So when a few like-minded brothers – led by a courageous young Ustaz – decided to do something because they were uncomfortable with the way SG society is heading, the response was overwhelming.

    Many are uncomfortable wuth, for eg, the movement to mainstream homosexuality in SG. That’s why there was strong support to wear white for the first day of Ramadhan.

    To be sure, the Minister and MUIS did what they could to foil the movement. Wearwhite was denied the open venue of a stadium. No matter. Muslims could use the mosque to voice their support of a return to fitrah, and a rejection of the mainstreaming of homosexuality.

    Even that was denied wear white. The Minister-in-charge of Muslim affairs made that statement that mosques must be neutral and not take a stand. Huh? The mosque should not take a stand against something that is clearly against Islam? Something that is heinous in the eyes of Allah azzawajal?

    But Alhamdulillah. Allah azzawajal is the Best of Planners. If wear white is restricted any physical space, they went into the virtual space. Subhanallah. So many sent pictures of support by uploading their pictures in white. Entire families wore white. There was a family who celebrated a new-born, and they all wore white. Mosques became seas of white. SG Muslims from as far as Alaska sent in pictures to lend their support to the movement. Then the Christians also lent their support, with entire congregations wearing white in the thousands.

    We ask Mr Alami and his new team in RSIS to please consider that the Msulim community is still very much conservative. And we are no longer content on being the silent majority. The sleeping giant has awakened, insha Allah.

    If we see more Liberal islam ideology being shoved down our throats, we will react. And we will make sure our voices are heard loud and clear.

    So let’s be clear. If there is any friction in the community, it is because the minority, led by an elite bent on altering the status quo, is pushing on with theis obstinate obsession of changing the very fabric of the Malay Muslim community.

    It is ill-advised. It is foolhardy.

    Ultimately, it is very unpopular with the masses.

    And would be the ultimate vote-loser.

    Wallahualam. Barakallahufeek.

    Authored by Syed Danial

    letters R1C

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: CONTACT RILEK1CORNER

deneme bonusu