Tag: Singapore

  • M Ravi Should Reconsider Decision To Not Run

    M Ravi Should Reconsider Decision To Not Run

    There was some speculation last week that human rights lawyer, M Ravi would run in the upcoming General Elections as a Reform Party candidate. However he poured cold water on that idea issuing a statement announcing his decision not to run. In most cases I would have left it at that – a candidate wishes not to run for personal reasons, however after reading that statement, I think otherwise.

    In it he cites 2 things – a calling and service. Indeed politics like lawyering, is a calling and similarly it’s about service. Mr Ravi may want to focus on his legal duties and service to his clients, but I do believe that he should also consider a greater calling and service – to the nation. If he had stood as an independent candidate in of all places – AMK GRC, I would not support the idea. I think to be an MP in Singapore, you need the support of a party behind you. There’s a lot of things behind the scenes that one must have or need to do. From the logistics of an MPS, to identifying residents’ problems and even gathering data to speak in the House – you can’t do it alone or with limited resources of an independent candidate.

    M Ravi has extensive experience as a lawyer – 18 years in fact. He’s handled the most serious of cases – ranging from those involving capital punishment to those that involve the rights of persons. He does not shirk from asking tough questions and raising arguments. I think there’s a shortage of politicians prepared to ask tough questions especially on the issue of our Laws. Far too many Laws have been enacted that are restrictive and unnecessary – the latest being the island wide alcohol ban after 10.30pm. Is it really necessary to have such a prohibitive law when the problem was basically restricted to Little India and parts of Clark Quay?

    What about Laws on basic freedoms? What about Laws on sentencing? Or even the system of justice and composition of the Legal Service and appointment of judicial officers? Is it prudent to have District Judges jumping back and forth from the AG’s Chambers to the Bench?  A prosecutor can of course become a Judge and vice-versa, but that should be that. You choose 1. This frequent interchanging of roles in my view tends to produce legal officers with narrower leanings or gives an impression of retaining ties to the AG’s Chambers. We need someone to ask hard and relevant questions.

    Next we have to look at upbringing and interaction with the common man. Although he’s a lawyer, M Ravi has always been associated with the common man. He isn’t aloof, he lives his life in a HDB estate, dresses and talks like a common man and crucially mixes with them. He doesn’t need to put an act. He takes public transport and witnesses the plight of ordinary Singaporeans daily. He can speak well, can ask questions and is not afraid to, he has the qualifications and places a premium on the value of service to his fellow man and nation. He ticks all the boxes that 1 should look for in a candidate.

    I understand that the Law Society will press on with some charges they have laid for him. But the charges are so ridiculous to begin with. He was diagnosed as having another episode of bi-polar disorder and has apologised for it. Moreover why should the Law Society get involved in matters where 1 person says things about another? The legal recourse to those parties is of course to commence a lawsuit, why is the Law Society playing judge? If the Law Society itself cites that it does not have any standing to deal with PAP MP Alvin Yeo for over-charging, that is a matter solely for a sub-committee, then pray tell why are they going after M Ravi, where evidence exists that this is a personal matter between 2 parties and that he has a solid statement from Dr Winslow that he was suffering from a major relapse at the time?

    I also understand that Dr Winslow has implemented a strict regime to ensure that such relapses will become a thing of the past or occur very very rarely. He has the support, he has the ability and he understands the issues facing the ordinary Singaporean, because he’s always been 1 of them. He will champion the cause of his residents, fight for them, serve them and most of all, he’ll be an MP who’ll go to the House, unafraid to speak up and ask the tough questions.

    I strongly urge him to reconsider his decision and to give it his all in the campaign. His service to his clients will not be affected, rather it’s a calling to serve the larger interests of community and nation. Finally we have so few Indians in Parliament prepared to ask questions and raise issues that the community are facing. When have we last seen a Tamil MP asking questions or speaking in Tamil? The influx of Indian nationals have severely affected the community – it’s time someone from their community spoke up for them and for other minorities in the resident Indian population in Singapore. M Ravi can be such a champion for them and for Singaporeans as a whole. The time is now – the calling is now – your nation needs you – you must run, M Ravi.

     

    Source: http://anyhowhantam.blogspot.sg

  • PAP Vs SDP: Which Video Is A Party Political Film?

    PAP Vs SDP: Which Video Is A Party Political Film?

    On 17 August, the Singapore Democratic Party video, entitled “Pappy Washing Powder”, was classified a party political film by the Media Development Authority (MDA) and is therefore prohibited under the Films Act.

    The MDA, however, has decided not to take further actions against the party as the video is considered the first party political film. The MDA said that as such the parties might not be fully aware of the requirements under the Act.

    The MDA reminded the political parties to abide by the Films Act and to ensure that political debate in Singapore is conducted in a responsible and dignified manner, and not by using the film medium to sensationalise serious issues in a biased or emotional manner”.

    The Films Act defines any film which is an advertisement made by or on behalf of any political party in Singapore, or any body whose objects relate wholly or mainly to politics in Singapore, or any branch of such party or body; or which is made by any person and directed towards any political end in Singapore.

    In May 2014, the youth wing of the PAP, Young PAP, released a video entitled, “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”, was cleared by the MDA and given a PG rating.

    The MDA said the video “does not fall under the category of political films”.

    The Straits Times reported:

    “This is because it does not have animation or dramatic elements. The video is also made by a political party and comprises its manifesto and ideology, on the basis of which the party’s candidates will seek to be elected.”

    The video seems to have been made private since then, after it drew widespread ridicule for being “robotic”. (A copy of it has been uploaded online by another Facebook page, and a parody of it emerged soon after. Please see below.)

    On Monday, the MDA classified the SDP video as a party political film.

    Can you tell why one is classified as such while the other is not?

    The Young PAP video (from another Facebook page) – “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”:

    Parody of the PAP’s “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”:

    SDP’s “Pappy Washing Powder”:

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Manager Who Slaps Employee In Viral Video Pleads Guilty

    Manager Who Slaps Employee In Viral Video Pleads Guilty

    The manager of an IT company who was caught on video punching and slapping a subordinate pleaded guilty on Tuesday (Aug 18) to four counts of voluntarily causing hurt.

    Lee Yew Nam, 44,  from Encore E-Services admitted that he assaulted Mr Calvin Chan Meng Hock, now 31, on four occasions in their office at the iHub at Jurong Town Hall Road between January and May 2013.

    Lee had slapped Mr Chan, grabbed his chin and pulled it back and punched his face a few times during this time.

    The court heard that he assaulted Mr Chan and scolded him with vulgarities for mistakes the younger man had made at work.

    Lee will be back in court on Sept 14.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Lazy Malaysian Customs Officer Bullies Singaporean Malay Family

    Lazy Malaysian Customs Officer Bullies Singaporean Malay Family

    Hi, guys! Please beware of this Malaysian officer!

    My husband was driving us back from supper through JB checkpoint towards Woodlands at about 2am and just our luck, we happened to drive through to his lane.He actually sleeping…(Can sleep eh during working hours???) but we also understand maybe he tired coz doing night shift.

    As usual, we passed the passports to him, 2 with passport covers with elastic bands and two without. A few seconds later, he passed the passports back and asked us to untangle those bands after he messed all four passports together. So yeah, we untangled it. And then after looking through the passports, he threw it back AGAIN and asked the passport covers to be removed And FYI, there is no nicer way to say but he has the most hostile and malicious face with such an unwelcoming vibe.

    So I was already annoyed and he called my name for verification. I looked at him as an acknowledgement and looked away fiddling with the elastic bands. And jeng jeng jeng.. He said, “When I call your name, you look at me. Understand?” With that face which I was already imagining smacking on the wall countlessly and with such a sarcastic and disrespectful tone!

    While I was halfway boiling, my brother tried to soother things down and apologised. And this officer stood up and said, “Fine. If you’re not happy with me, I’ll speak to my supervisor”. And we were all caught off-guard.

    So my husband and brother went to the office, trying to cool the matter and he questioned my brother, “Do you even know who I am? Do you know who you’re speaking to?” I TELL YOU, HE GOT BALLS, MAN! So apparently, he was complaining to his supervisor that I was being uncooperative bla bla blah.

    My husband told him our side of the story before the supervisor told the officer to leave. And HE WAS SMILING AWAY I was so infuriated that I stood right in front of the officer and questioned why is he being dismissed without even bother to apologize to me! This officer just chuckled and laughing away, walking out and I swear I could have knocked all of his front teeth! YES, I WAS THAT ANGRYYY. So my husband tried to calm me down, knowing there is really no use fighting over such a corrupted situation/personnels.

    And we should all thank ourselves and our ancestors that we are no longer merged with such a corrupted

    He wants to act as if he’s some bloody Anak Datok, come I give you free publicity.

    I-Da Zainuddin
    A.S.S. Reader

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Male Cosmetic Doctor Charged With Molest Of Male Patient

    Male Cosmetic Doctor Charged With Molest Of Male Patient

    A cosmetic doctor allegedly molested a male liposuction patient three times – twice after injecting him with stupefying drugs in a hotel room, where he had taken him to “recuperate”, a court heard yesterday.

    Tan Kok Leong, 49, went on trial accused of three charges of outraging the modesty of a 33-year-old Malaysian doctor, who cannot be named due to a gag order. He faces another two of administering drugs so that he could molest him.

    The court heard that he first touched the fellow doctor’s genitals during a liposuction procedure on his waist at Life Source Medical Centre at Novena Medical Centre on June 6, 2013.

    On July 5 that year, he performed another liposuction procedure on the man at the clinic and then told him that he had booked a room for him at the nearby Oasia Hotel, where he could rest afterwards.

    In an agreed statement of facts, Deputy Public Prosecutor Victor Lim said that when the pair got there, Tan told his patient he would inject him with the sleeping drug Dormicum and painkiller Rosiden.

    Tan then allegedly pulled down the other doctor’s shorts and took photographs of his genitals.

    Both men stayed at the hotel the next day, when Tan allegedly repeated the two offences.

    The defence argued that the complainant could not have been molested during the June 6 liposuction as his girlfriend, also a doctor, was present along with another doctor.

    Lawyers Edmond Pereira and Vickie Tan said the complainant was fully awake during the procedure and had consented to the photos being taken at the hotel.

    Tan was a partner at Life Source Medical Practice, which has since closed, and was licensed to perform liposuction.

    The maximum punishment for outrage of modesty is two years’ jail, a fine and caning. For administering of stupefying drugs, the maximum is 10 years’ jail and caning.

    The hearing continues.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu