Tag: Singaporeans

  • NUS Suspends Academic While It Investigates His Involvement In Case Of Imam’s Remarks

    NUS Suspends Academic While It Investigates His Involvement In Case Of Imam’s Remarks

    The National University of Singapore (NUS) has suspended the academic who had openly criticised another man who made public an imam’s comments.

    The university told The Straits Times on Wednesday (Mar 8) that it had suspended Associate Professor Khairudin Aljunied from his duties on Monday (March 6).

    This “follows from (his) purported comments made in relation to insensitive remarks about Christians and Jews allegedly made by a religious leader”, a spokesman for the university said.

    During this time, the university will internally investigate Dr Khairudin’s involvement in the matter, though he will still receive his pay, the spokesman added.

    “As part of due process, NUS will launch an internal investigation into Assoc Prof Khairudin’s involvement in this incident. Assoc Prof Khairudin will continue to be paid his full salary during his suspension,” the university said.

    When contacted, Dr Khairudin said he was unable to comment due to the ongoing investigations.

    Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam told Parliament last week that the police are looking into the conduct of everyone involved in the case.

    Last month, investment associate Terence Nunis posted a video online of an imam at Jamae Mosque who, after a sermon, reportedly recited a prayer in Arabic that said “God grant us victory over Jews and Christians”, among other things.

    The video gained traction online and offline and, as part of due process, the imam has been placed on leave while investigations, which the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis) is assisting in, are ongoing.

    The case sparked a storm in the community, and many felt the postings could be used to cast aspersions on Islam and religious leaders. Some also felt the imam’s recitation had been taken out of context.

    Dr Khairudin, a tenured academic at NUS’ Malay Studies department, had posted on his Facebook page a fictional conversation between an imam and a “silly convert”.

    In the post, Dr Khairudin described the convert as being stupid for getting upset over the verses.

    Mr Shanmugam had said that Dr Khairudin “encouraged vilification” of the whistleblowing individual. He said: “Mr Khairudin’s position and actions are quite unacceptable… He supports a position that is quite contrary to the norms, values and laws in Singapore.”

    On Saturday, the minister added that police will investigate the case thoroughly and interview all parties involved, including those who filmed and publicised the video.

    “Whether there is a case for further action against any of the parties, will depend on the outcome of investigations,” he added.

    “The Government does not take sides in this issue – if anyone is found to have committed an offence, action will be taken.”

    NUS added on Wednesday that it “takes a serious view of any actions or speech that condone the promotion of hatred, ill-will and enmity that targets specific faith communities”.

    “Members of the NUS community must observe standards and policies on staff conduct, which include respecting different views and communicating responsibly,” it said.

     

    Source: ST

  • Kereta Sorong Bayi Dibenarkan Dalam Bas Awam Mulai 2 April

    Kereta Sorong Bayi Dibenarkan Dalam Bas Awam Mulai 2 April

    Keluarga-keluarga yang membawa kereta sorong bayi akan dibenarkan menaiki bas awam bermula 2 April ini sebagai sebahagian daripada pelan untuk menjadikan perjalanan dengan anak-anak kecil lebih mudah dan selesa.

    Menteri Kedua Pengangkutan Ng Chee Meng berkata demikian semasa Parlimen membahaskan peruntukan bagi kementeriannya pada Rabu (8 Mac).

    Beliau menarik perhatian bahawa ia adalah sesuatu yang mencabar untuk melipat kereta sorong itu sebelum menaiki bas awam, tetapi Penguasa Pengangkutan Darat (LTA) dan para pengendali bas benar-benar prihatin terhadap keselamatan kanak-kanak kecil, misalnya, jika pemandu bas menekan brek atau membelok secara tiba-tiba.

    Ibu bapa harus memberi tumpuan sepenuhnya dan memikul tanggungjawab atas keselamatan anak-anak mereka, dan memegang kereta-kereta sorong setiap masa,” katanya.

    “Sedang kami berusaha ke arah sistem pengangkutan awam yang lebih inklusif, saya menggesa para penumpang lain supaya bersabar jika ia mengambil masa yang lebih lama untuk keluarga-keluarga dengan kereta sorong menaiki bas.”

    Perubahan itu adalah sebahagian daripada rancangan pemerintah untuk membangunkan sistem pengangkutan masa hadapan yang lebih inklusif.

    Encik Ng berkata ia mesti direka dengan baik untuk memenuhi keperluan golongan-golongan yang memerlukan, seperti golongan kurang upaya, keluarga dengan anak-anak kecil dan bilangan penduduk yang menua.

    BANTU GOLONGAN KURANG UPAYA

    Encik Ng turut menarik perhatian bahawa semua stesen MRT dan pusat pertukaran bas kini bebas hadangan, dan 92 peratus bas awam juga mesra kerusi roda.

    Jumlah ini akan meningkat kepada 98 peratus menjelang hujung tahun depan, dan 100 peratus sebelum 2020.

    Sungguhpun demikian, masih ada ruang untuk ia dipertingkatkan.

    Beliau berkata LTA akan memulakan percubaan pengumuman audio dalam bas, untuk membantu para penumpang kurang daya penglihatan.

    Ini juga akan diuji sebagai peningkatan kepada sistem paparan maklumat penumpang baru, yang sedang diuji bagi bas nombor 106.

    LTA juga mempunyai rancangan untuk bekerjasama dengan SG Enable, iaitu sebuah agensi pengupayaan bagi golongan kurang upaya.

    Sebagai sebahagian daripada kerjasama ini, SG Enable akan memanfaatkan Stesen MRT Redhill, yang digunakan oleh kebanyakan golongan kurang upaya untuk ke Enabling Village di Lengkok Bahru.

    Beliau juga menarik perhatian bahawa ia cukup mencabar bagi golongan kurang upaya untuk melakukan perjalanan antara Stesen Redhill dan Enabling Village, disebabkan kawasannya yang berbukit dan jarak sejauh 400 meter.

    Beliau turut menggesa LTA dan SG Enable supaya mencari huraian bagi isu ini.

    Source: BeritaMediacorp

  • The Artist Behind The Golden Stairs: Is It Possible To Draw A Line Between Art And Vandalism?

    The Artist Behind The Golden Stairs: Is It Possible To Draw A Line Between Art And Vandalism?

    The artist Priyageetha Dia responded on her Facebook:

    Someone asked why would I do something stupid like that? Well yes, stupid it may seem to you. Was it done out of impulse? No. Is it because you Indian that’s why you like gold so much? *smacks forehead.

    This work has been on my mind for the past one month and I was definitely apprehensive on realising it until two days ago. The process was an invigorating one though I was apprehensive of the consequences I may face. At the end of the 5-hour long hushed deed, the intervention of the gold finally reverberated against the ever lifeless and grey architecture on the 20th floor of my block.

    My practice deals with spaces that negotiate concepts on the sacred, secular and the profane. As such, I am intrigued with spaces that I have inhabited over the course of 25 years as a HDB dweller and thus it has prompted me to intervene away from the household and into public spaces. But what constitutes public and private space? How does that apply along with the sacred etc.? And why gold? I would love to list down the conceptual reasoning of what the work is about but wouldn’t it make the work seem less interesting then?

    So, is it possible to draw a line between art and vandalism? I consider this work as art and not vandalism. Though one would say about the legal system and its regulations but I do believe I did not deface anything, what I did was to enhance the space and my surroundings. This work provokes. Provokes in all sense we are used to living the standard way of life, and all of a sudden something as glaring as gold negotiates the space. My work does not seek to obliterate a public space; vandalism in all sense has no respect for another individual.

    I do know the social responsibility of an artist (though I don’t consider myself an artist yet, cause it’s too much of an honorific term). I didn’t intend to please the public with my work but it was definitely a sense of satisfaction for me. After practising arts under the academy for almost 3 years, I needed to break away from that zone. What better way to make art and have it on display beyond the white cube.

    Source: Facebook

  • Public Prosecutor Will Not Appeal 4-Year Jail Sentence For Joshua Robinson: AGC

    Public Prosecutor Will Not Appeal 4-Year Jail Sentence For Joshua Robinson: AGC

    Following a “careful” review, the Public Prosecutor has decided not to appeal against the four-year jail term imposed on convicted sexual predator Joshua Robinson last week, noting that the punishment he got was broadly in line with relevant past cases’.

    In a statement on Wednesday (March 8), the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) added that while some have called for caning to be imposed on Robinson, the offences he was charged with did not allow the court to do so.

    The AGC also said: “In discharging our duties, we do not differentiate between Singaporeans and non-Singaporeans.”

    The American mixed-martial arts instructor was sentenced to four years’ jail last week for a myriad offences, ranging from sexual penetration of two 15-year-olds to showing an obscene film to a six-year-old girl.

    Following his sentencing, the case attracted widespread public attention, with many questioning why Robinson was not punished more severely – including an online petition being started on Sunday calling for a harsher sentence. More than 26,000 people, including the father of the six-year-old girl affected, have signed the petition, as of Wednesday afternoon.

    In 2015, Robinson contacted a 15-year-old girl through social media repeatedly, and exchanged numbers with her. He instructed the girl to wear her school uniform during their first meeting, where they went to his apartment along Upper Circular Road. There, he filmed them engaging in sexual acts.

    After the girl made a police report, the police found 5,902 obscene films in Robinson’s apartment, of which 321 featured child pornography – the largest stash found on an individual. The children in these videos were between the ages of two and 16.

    In its statement, the AGC said that by getting Robinson, 39, to plead guilty instead of claim trial, his three young victims were spared the ordeal of having to testify in court.

    It had asked for four to five years’ jail to be imposed, after taking into account, among other things, “the fact that by securing a guilty plea, the three young victims would be spared the trauma of having to testify and be cross-examined in a trial”.

    The AGC also addressed public comments that Robinson should have been charged with rape, statutory rape or outrage of modesty, and be subject to caning. It explained that statutory rape only applies to victims who have not turned 14, which was not the case in Robinson’s offences. And because both girls had consented to these sexual acts, an offence of rape could not be pressed against Robinson.

    The most serious offence that Robinson had committed was sexual penetration of a minor under 16 years old, and that did not provide for caning, the AGC added.

    AGC said that it would be discussing with the Ministry of Law whether the relevant legislation should be reviewed to enhance sentencing for some of the offences.

     

    Source: Today

  • Town Council Says HDB Staircase Covered In Gold Foil ‘Not Permissible’

    Town Council Says HDB Staircase Covered In Gold Foil ‘Not Permissible’

    The Jalan Besar Town Council is reaching out to an arts student who covered the 20th floor staircase of a Jalan Rajah flat with gold foil to explore future collaboration, although it made clear what she did was “unauthorised” and “not permissible”.

    Responding to queries from TODAY, a spokesman said the town council wants to “explore ways in which we may be able to work together” as it is “supportive of efforts by the community to enhance our living environment”.

    Ms Priyageetha Dia, who is studying fine arts at Lasalle College of the Arts, had earlier identified herself on Facebook as the person behind the “golden staircase” at Block 103 Jalan Rajah.

    “We appreciate Ms Priyageetha Dia’s desire to enhance her surrounding space,” said the spokesman. “Under the Town Council’s (Common Property and Open Spaces) By-laws, however, this constitutes an unauthorised act and is thus not permissible.”

    Set in the public area near her unit, Ms Dia said the artwork exists to question “what constitutes public and private spaces” and if it is “possible to draw a line between art and vandalism”.

    She said she came up with the idea a month ago, but only executed it on Sunday (March 5) despite being apprehensive of the consequences she might face. The “hush deed” took five hours.

    Aware that she was treading a thin line between art and vandalism, Ms Dia asserted that she “did not deface anything”.

    “What I did was to enhance the space and my surroundings,” said Ms Dia, who lives on the 20th floor. “This work provokes. Provokes in all sense (as) we are used to living the standard way of life, and all of a sudden something as glaring as gold negotiates the space. My work does not seek to obliterate a public space; vandalism in all sense has no respect for another individual.”

     

    Source: Today

deneme bonusu