Tag: Singaporeans

  • Former-Muslim: Apostates Should Not Be Afraid To Speak Out Against Rise Of Islamism

    Former-Muslim: Apostates Should Not Be Afraid To Speak Out Against Rise Of Islamism

    If you had ask me this question, even five or eight years after the tragic events of 9/11, I would have said “It means nothing, there’s really no difference between being a Muslim and a Ex-Muslim” but lately, this isn’t the case anymore, being apathetic to current events especially those pertaining to Muslims and Islamic affairs is a luxury an Ex-Muslim can no longer enjoy.

    There’s no denying it, Islamism is on the rise.
    Islamism is the ideology of instating Sharia through political means, using democracy to defeat itself, like in the case of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
    This politicization of Islam has ignited a war of identity politics with Muslims around the world.
    Where a majority of Muslims see themselves as Muslims first as evident here in Singapore, the last General Elections where all but 2 political parties had their Malay candidates flaunt their piousness, and their ethnic cultures second and this drive and passion to be the best Muslim one can be is destroying communities and splitting apart families. Making it even more of a taboo for apostates to go public, as one does not simply leave Islam, you could say because doing so in certain countries warrants social suicide, jail time or even death.

    I, myself, was found out to be an atheist early this year by a nosy relative who read one of my replies to a friend on facebook.
    This was a shocker to many in my family, so I took it upon myself to come out publicly to my relatives and up to this day, some of them are still upset that I’ve left Islam for a whole 16 years, urging me to return to the faith, to reeducate (be indoctrinated again) myself, which I respectfully declined.
    As an Ex-Muslim, there’s absolutely no reason for me to go back to Islam, why would I?
    I view Islam as I do other religions, ancient fairy tales to police morality, and often these outdated moral codex are often out of touch with the present, condoning genital mutilation, wife beating, slavery and sex slavery.

    And before someone tells me that I have to respect Islam and the Quranic verses, don’t you think if I had respected them, I would have remained a Muslim? I respect the right of Muslims to believe in what they chose to believe in, even if it means that they cherry pick parts of Quran that advocate peace and only peace. Religions do not have rights, religions have rites, these rites end where human rights begin and I have the right to disagree, oppose and challenge Islamic teaching, Muslim beliefs and leave the religion.

    And this is what has changed in the last decade, this idea that Islam is deserving of respect and immune from scrutiny.
    This is what happens when an ideology gets politicized, we have prominent figures like the Pope victim blaming the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo saying they shouldn’t be making fun of other people’s religions. We lose sight of our priorities treating a Muslim boy who was held in remand for a day after making a bomb hoax with more regard than focusing on the young Shiite Muslim man, Ali Mohamed Baqir Al-Nimr, (and his uncle) who are sentenced to death by beheading then having their headless bodies crucified by the Saudi government for being apart of a pro democracy protest.

    Muslims are not a minority in the same way an ethnic group can be considered a minority.
    You do not become a minority for choosing to be apart of a religious ideology that is not popular in a certain part of the world.
    The more you treat Muslims as a minority the harder it is for Ex-Muslims to leave Islam without repercussion because you’re enforcing the idea that religion and ethnicity are one and this is dangerous as it is already supported the identity politics of Islamism.
    Islam is a choice, do not forget that.
    This choice apparently has been forgotten by a lot of Muslims who condemn apostates to death and chase them out of their home countries.

    The plight of Ex-Muslims also not helped by the rise of “Political Correctness” either.
    Recently 2 ex-Muslim women were barred from speaking at university campuses so Muslim students won’t be offended, Maryam Namazie from Warwick and Ayaan Hirsi Ali from Brandeis.
    Warwick later overturned it’s decision after an online petition had garnered thousands of support and Ayaan Hirsi Ali was invited by secular Muslims from another University campus to speak but the fact remains that we’re treating Muslims like children who cannot handle an opposing view point and that we must protect their delicate sensibilities as they’re a minority group and evil Ex-Muslims are oppressing them.

    When in reality, it’s the reverse, that the ex-Muslims are the minority and the Muslims are oppressing people like us.
    People like Raif Badawi who has been sentenced to 1000 lashes and 10 years imprisonment for “insulting” Islam when the only thing hes been guilty of is promoting secularism.
    Niloy Neel, and other Bangladeshi apostates who have been murdered by mobs of vigilante Muslims.
    Taslima Nasrin an author from Bangladesh who now lives in exile because a fatwa was issued against her for literary works, one of which speaks out against Islamic philosophy.
    Salman Rushdie another author who has a fatwa on him for his literary work.
    Meriam Yehya Ibrahim Ishag who apostatized from Islam into Christianity who was sentenced to death in 2014 but had escaped from Sudan.
    And all the ridiculous laws inspired by Sharia in Muslim majority countries like Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Brunei to protect the sanctity of Islam that seeks to silence any and all dissent.

    Silencing dissenting voices like the people I’ve mentioned, mine and anyone who criticizes Islam and Muslim practices that violate human rights, like the amputation of the hand of a thief or genital mutilation, by calling us Islamophobic in the name of Political Correctness so you can appear to be an uber liberal is more damaging to Secular Muslims than anyone else. Throughout my writing of this article, I have not mentioned the term “Moderate Muslim” once because to me that is an insulting term to call someone a moderate, an average person, as though the radicalized Muslims are the true representation of Muslims, something no Ex-Muslim or prominent critic of Islam has ever said.

    If they’re not a secular Muslim, they’re just a Muslim.
    One of the many silent “majority”, we don’t know the real number of Muslims who do oppose Islamism so in good faith, lets assume the majority is just apathetic to Islamism. Secular muslims are unique in this equation because I believe the reformation of Islam into a personal belief instead of a political tool is in their hands and it serves no purpose to other secular Muslims who want their voices heard when they know it will just be drowned out by accusations of Islamophobia and bigotry. I don’t know how a Muslim be called islamophobic and bigoted to their own group but it does happen to people like Maajid Nawaz and Irshad Manji, practicing Muslims who uphold secular values and speak out about Islamism while advocating a more personal non politically motivated Islam.

    The reformation of this religion cannot happen through an external influence, non muslim critics and ex-Muslims alike.
    We’ve seen what happens when an Islamic regime in Iraq was overthrown, ISIS took power and the ideology of Islamism flourished.
    So where does this leave ex-Muslims like us?
    We’re not responsible and cannot be the force behind its reformation but we still have a role to play.

    If you’re an ex-Muslim and you feel safe enough to be open about your apostasy, make yourself heard, share your stories. (with us if you’d like)
    Engage would be Muslim Apologists who play hide the ball from the media by calling Islam a “religion of peace” when it clearly isn’t.
    It’s a religion like others from the Abrahamic religions, containing warlike parts, More so than the predecessors.
    Stand up for your rights when the “politically correct” attempts to play the oppressed minority card when they try to silence any criticism Islam.
    Help those on the fence realize that leaving Islam is a choice and there others out there like them.
    And most importantly, if you’re from a country that registers you as a Muslim, get yourself unregistered (Assuming no harm would come to your person) so the media stops saying that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world and realize that apostasy from Islam is on the rise.

    This is what it means to be an ex-Muslim, for me.
    And I hope more ex-Muslims join me in Speaking out against Islamism for the sake of those who can’t.

    Peace!
    Riz Rashid

     

    Source: Council Of Ex-Muslims of Singapore – CEMS

  • Schizophrenic Convicted Of Sending Threatening Facebook Messages To Lee Hsien Loong

    Schizophrenic Convicted Of Sending Threatening Facebook Messages To Lee Hsien Loong

    In what is believed to be the first case of its kind, a 33-year-old Singaporean man has been found guilty on Tuesday (Oct 6) of sending threatening messages to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong via Facebook.

    Tan Yeong Hong said he became frustrated when he attended a Meet the People’s Session (MPS) in PM Lee’s Ang Mo Kio ward on Jun 24 this year, only to find that the PM would not be there.

    Tan said he attended the MPS to pass the PM “an article he had typed out”. He had to settle for passing the letter to a grassroots leader instead.

    In the four threatening messages he sent to the PM, Tan said: “Eh, you challenged me to visit your MPS but you are not here. I will find and stage an attack on you when I have information on your public appearances. You know who I am”.

    Tan also included his NRIC number and handphone number in the messages.

    A police report was lodged the next day by a Senior Manager of the Online Communications Unit of the Prime Minister’s Office, which manages the PM’s social media accounts.

    HE IS ‘VIOLENT … ALWAYS ARMED WITH A KNIFE’

    A team of investigating officers traced the messages to Tan, and a background check revealed that he lived at Block 108 Hougang Avenue 1, while his father lived in an old folks’ home and his mother had been admitted to hospital.

    Police interviewed Tan’s parents, who informed them at their son was “a violent person … always armed himself with a knife”.

    Hours later, police nabbed Tan close to his home. A hostile Tan punched a policeman on his shoulder and elbowed another in the face, but was eventually subdued and placed under arrest.

    In a search of Tan’s home, police found assorted dangerous weapons including a hammer, two choppers and several knives. Police also found a list of PM’s upcoming public appearances.

    Tan admitted that he had brought a hammer along to the MPS but never intended to use it.
    The man also disclosed that he had been approached 10 years ago by an unnamed Chinese male, and was “instructed to pass ‘data’ to PM Lee”. He claimed he “was being prompted by someone with a hidden audio and surveillance device” planted in his house.

    “The people in the audio and surveillance system told me to … throw a hammer at (PM) because he refused to take the document from me after he had asked me to prepare it”, Tan said.

    When District Judge Mathew Joseph asked if Tan had seen this device, Tan said that he had not.

    TAN SUFFERS FROM PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Andre Chong said that psychiatric reports show that Tan suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, which had been left untreated at the time of his offences. The illness played “a large contributory role in (his) offending behavior”, according to the report. However, Tan was not found to be of unsound mind and is still fit to plead, the report concluded.

    Tan, who was unrepresented, said he is sorry for “the childish act” and asked for a light sentence because his mother has had knee surgery and is father is a stroke patient. “I was facing financial problems”, Tan said, in response to Judge Mathew’s question as to why he had sent the threats to the PM.

    “I think I’m living in a unit with a secret camera”, Tan told the court, and stated again that he had no intention of carrying out the threats.

    Judge Mathew, speaking to Tan directly, said this is “an extremely serious case, you are facing a stiff sentence”, and expressed concern that the accused did not realise the severity of the charges he is facing.

    When he heard that the prosecution intended to seek a sentence of 18 to 23 months’ jail, Tan did an about-turn and told the judge that he did in fact wish to engage counsel.

    The judge, having previously expressed his intention to refer Tan’s case to a voluntary lawyer “in the interests of justice and fairness” and “in light of the charges (Tan) is facing”, adjourned the matter until Oct 15, at which a lawyer for Tan is expected to be present.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Chan Heng Chee Is Wrong – CMIO Categorisation Is Only PAP’s Tool To Subjugate And Discriminate Against The Minorities

    Chan Heng Chee Is Wrong – CMIO Categorisation Is Only PAP’s Tool To Subjugate And Discriminate Against The Minorities

    Rilek1Corner,

    As a Malay, I am insulted by the comments of the Ambassador-at-large Prof. Chan Heng Chee in http://rilek1corner.com/2015/10/05/singapore-ambassador-at-large-scrapping-cmio…. She want to defend the outdated CMIO categorisation that is her problem but what right does she have to say that scrapping it would cause so-called “unease” among minorities. She is Chinese. Not minority. Why she speaking like she macam faham?

    Worse still, she say “The majority community doesn’t feel uncomfortable. It’s (with) the minority community (where) you have to keep emphasising it’s equal language, religion, culture (and) race”. She is trying to say what? Minority races are petty? Minority races always comparing themselves with the majority? That minority races always imagining inequalities and discrimination? Then the majority race very good not racist at all?

    I want to say she is very wrong. She is from majority and she is elite. She doesn’t represent us. She ambassador she got talk to people on the ground in Singapore? Who make her expert on minority issue? She ambassador so what? Don’t mean everything she say is correct.

    I tell you, don’t be blinded by what she say. This is only wayang for them. Like she say, the CMIO categorisation is a “signal” to the minority that “every race has the same standing” and that “their place in society has not been threatened”.

    A signal. She knows reality is not like that. A signal because the categories are the PAP’s idea of what makes up the different communities, not what the communities really are. The categorisation is a construct that makes people fall within neat categories, that, most of the time, don’t fit them well. What is a Malay? Who is Malay? The rich cultural heritage of people that come together from different parts of the nusantara are lost because of this categorisation. Bawean, Bugis, Java, Johor, Aceh – so convenient all become Malay.

    This easy categorisation benefits the PAP government, not us the people. Who knows in the future Filipinos also come under the categorisation because they can easily say that Filipinos and Malays share almost the same language and physical appearance. Even now Singaporean Chinese also cannot tell the difference until they hear the accent when we talk.

    It is not ony a problem culturally. There are many legal effect on people too.

    Just because you are categorised as Malay, you have lower chance of owning a HDB flat in a neighbourhood you desire. HDB ethnic quota also a problem when you want to sell your house. You go serve NS and chances are that you will be posted to Civil Defence instead of Commando. Why in Civil Defence no ethnic quota? Why the PAP government can be fine with the over-representation of Malays in CD?

    Maybe you have not realise before but you should know now that the CMIO categorisation is a very convenient tool to discriminate against our community. To keep us economically backward, so that the majority elites can prosper.

    The ambassador talk so much about the supra-ethnic identity but if the PAP government is really serious about forging a national identity after SG50, they should do away with the race categorisation.  We will not lose our ethnic identities. Actually the opposite effect is we will explore our ethnic identities and be more in touch with it. There will be a more equal playing field. Our race will not be a factor when we decide to buy a house or when called up to serve NS. Only then will a true Singaporean identity emerge.

    Danial

    Reader Contribution

  • Man Molests & Assaults Female Escort On Paid Date, Police Unhelpful

    Man Molests & Assaults Female Escort On Paid Date, Police Unhelpful

    Dear Editors,

    The man in the photo Wong Hxxx Mxxx is married with a wife but has girlfriends and sugar babes. He asked girl in the photo out on a paid date. On the date, girl refuses his sexual advances, he molested her by removing her bra strap and pinching her nipples in locked car. But refused to pay her for date fee agreed upfront.

    He locked her in his car and drove to the nearby police station. When she stepped out of the car, he pinned her down to the ground and attacked her. Her limbs were bruised and face bleeding. He later ask to mediate by compensating her in return for not pressing charges. But after she signed on the “agreement” paper, he coined excuses such as no bank token, has daily withdrawal limit, phone no SIM card etc to not stick to the terms of agreement.

    I’m the friend of this girl. Pls publicise this so there won’t be any victims cheated by this guy anymore ! Best thing is, police actually advice the girl to mediate and settle with Wong, so they won’t have to take statements and send for IO.

    More work done, and before anyone realises , all three police officers are off duty before they check if the mediation is carried out dutifully.

    In the end, guy took Advantage of the situation. He made the victim sign an agreement letter not to press charges, then find some excuse to go home to take bank token and of course, never stick to his part of the agreement on compensation. Please publicise such a scammer!

    Derrick Goh
    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Beware Of Mobile Phone Re-Constract Scam, I Ended Up WIth $15,000 Debt

    Beware Of Mobile Phone Re-Constract Scam, I Ended Up WIth $15,000 Debt

    <Complaint by nakedtons>

    I got a phone call from an ex-colleague who first told me about earning commission by signing phone contracts. He referred me to another victim who got the mastermind scammer to contact me.

    The scammer told me that to earn commission, I had to sign phone contracts and passed the phones to him and he will get a third party to cancel the contracts in office. I trusted him and by sheer desperation after losing my job, I agreed and went with him to sign 2 contracts with Singtel, 2 from Starhub and 1 from m1 with max plans with the phones coming in for free. It is a total of 5 contracts amounting to about $1000 a month with about $3000 for early termination fee for each contract I signed. All were iPhone 6s Plus 128 gb Rose Gold which he took to sell. He gave me $200 as commission for each phone I signed.

    This fella assured me he will get them canceled for me and told me to wait 5 working days to process. I managed to stay in contact with him during that period but after 5 working days, the contracts are still not canceled. Only then I had a feeling that I had been scammed but that scammer had disappeared out of reach. I am now left with massive contract debts which i cannot afford to pay. I then started contacting the ex-colleague who introduced me to this offer only then I confirmed it is a scam as he told me I am not the only person who complained to him. Many victims already did. He told me to make a police report otherwise more victims will fall into the scam as well.

    I had thought about making a police report but my father advised against it. He told me if I do so, I will be charged by the law and go to prison as well for collaborating with him. He told me to just ‘sucked it up’ and pay the massive bills which i surely can’t afford. I am at no wits’ end and even contemplating ending my life! What is the best I should do to get it resolve?

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

deneme bonusu