Tag: Singaporeans

  • Singapore’s Exam Smarts Could Come At Expense Of Innovation

    Singapore’s Exam Smarts Could Come At Expense Of Innovation

    While the Republic’s education system has cultivated students who are top performers in international exams, this could come at the expense of encouraging innovation. And teachers here must be less risk-averse, if Singapore wants an education system that creates innovators.

    These were among the views expressed by various experts at an education conference yesterday, which was organised by the International Association for Scholastic Excellence. The conference was attended by about 1,000 delegates from all over the world, among them school leaders and educators.

    Speaking to TODAY on the sidelines of the summit, Dr Tony Wagner, an expert-in-residence at Harvard University’s Innovation Lab, described Singapore’s education system as one rooted in a long history of “testing for meritocracy” and “testing for equality of opportunity”.

    “The challenge for Singapore is to realise that the current testing and grading system is not going to develop young innovators; it’s only going to develop good test-takers,” said Dr Wagner, who was one of the summit’s featured speakers. It also encourages “bad behaviour”, where parents spend large sums of money on sending tuition classes for their children, while teachers have to prepare students for major examinations at a young age, he added.

    Singapore could delay major tests for admission to institutions of higher education as well as change assessment methods to one that adopts essay-based exams, simulation and interviews, he suggested. For instance, Dr Wagner shared during his speech that he uses only three grades in his classes: A, B or incomplete. If students do not meet standards, they were graded incomplete, rather than given a fail grade.

    Singaporean students have fared well in international assessments, most recently in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test in 2012, in which the 15-year-olds who sat for the test emerged tops when it came to problem-solving skills. Students here have also been ranked among the best performers in the areas of mathematics, science and reading literacy skills.

    When an audience member pointed out that high-stakes tests are often used to gain admission to schools such as Harvard and Cambridge University, Dr Wagner suggested that parents forgo these options and consider schools such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which started inviting admission candidates to submit portfolios in place of taking tests.

    Experts today also suggested that local teachers be trained differently. While educators here are among the most informed on the evidence of effective teaching and learning, they have also developed an aversion to risk-taking, said Mr Simon Breakspear, founder and chief executive officer of LearnLabs, an education consultancy.

    “But the challenge in education…is to know how to make it work in our context, and this is where risk-taking is going to be required. There is a tendency here to do what’s worked before and not do anything that would be seen to be stepping out of the norm,” he said.

    If educators are not regularly taking risks in designing teaching and learning, it will be difficult for Singapore to evolve into a system that creates innovators, he added.

    Dr Stephen Murgatroyd, president of Murgatroyd Communications and Consulting, who also spoke at the conference, said the testing regime in Singapore has left some children behind.

    “Unless you can afford the high cost of tutoring in addition to classroom work, you’re not going to make it to the university, college route… In the pursuit of meritocracy,…you’re actually losing a lot of talent,” he said.

    Asked about Singapore’s SkillsFuture initiative, he also said he could not understand Singapore’s preoccupation with skills, and that the education system should focus on developing talent instead.

    “Kids who start primary school this year will apply for jobs that don’t yet exist, so what skills do we need for these jobs that we don’t know anything about, we haven’t a clue. What are skills and competencies for all these unknown jobs? We have no idea,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singaporeans In Yemen Urged To Contact MFA Due As Difficulties Mount In Evacuations

    Singaporeans In Yemen Urged To Contact MFA Due As Difficulties Mount In Evacuations

    SINGAPORE’S Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) have urged Singaporeans in war-torn Yemen to contact the ministry, as it warns that current evacuation operations have become increasingly challenging there due to the volatile situation.

    “In recent weeks, MFA has worked with foreign governments, which are mounting operations, to evacuate a few Singaporean families,” said the MFA in a statement today.

    “However, it is unclear how long such operations will continue given the fluid ground conditions.”

    The ministry added that it is keeping in close touch with the remaining Singaporeans in the Middle-east country while continuing to coordinate with other countries to facilitate their departure.

    Relief workers have warned of a dire situation in the impoverished state, where a Saudi-led coalition is waging an air war on Iran-backed Houthi Shi’ite rebels who seized power in the capital Sanaa.

    Last Tuesday, a Singaporean woman living in Aden, Yemen’s main southern city, contacted the MFA to seek help desperately as rebel troops closed in on the city.

    With assistance from officials, Madam Sherin Fathimah, 37, and her four children, aged between four and 13, were eventually picked up by a Chinese frigate last Thursday at the Port of Aden and taken to Djibouti on the Horn of Africa.

    Madam Sherin and her children arrived safely in Singapore last Saturday.

    At least 53 people were killed in 24 hours of street fighting and heavy shelling between rebels and fighters loyal to the Saudi-backed President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi in Aden, medical and army sources said yesterday. Aden is the last bastion of support for Mr Hadi who fled from Sanaa to Aden in February.

    The World Health Organisation today said that fighting in Yemen over the past few weeks has killed more than 540 people and wounded 1,700 as the country sinks deeper into a multi-sided conflict.

    Singaporeans in Yemen who have not contacted the MFA or require urgent assistance may contact the MFA Duty Officer (24 hours) at 6379 8800/8855 or [email protected]. They can also eRegister with MFA at http://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/.

     

    Source: www.thestraitstimes.com

  • Rat Problems In Bedok South?

    Rat Problems In Bedok South?

    Residents at a cluster of blocks in Bedok South Avenue 3 are worried that their area may become “the next Bukit Batok hill” if the growing number of rats there is left unchecked.

    Many rodents have been spotted around blocks 69 to 72 in the past year. Some residents said they have seen swarms of 20 rats scampering around in a carpark at night.

    In December, a hilly area near Bukit Batok MRT station was infested by rats. This was blamed on leftover scraps from the indiscriminate feeding of stray dogs. More than 300 rats there were killed by pest controllers over two weeks.

    Bedok South residents who spoke to The Straits Times suggested several possible causes – a nearby garbage collection point and a food disposal area near a coffee shop in Block 69.

    East Coast Town Council (ECTC) said it was alerted to the rise in rat numbers by conservancy workers and residents last week, and has since taken measures to control the pests.

    Mr Adrian Theseira, managing director of Wipeout Pest Control Services, which is leading the extermination exercise, said it has found more than 30 rat burrows and nests across blocks 69 to 72.

    As of Monday night, it caught 38 rodents using traps in areas such as drains and rubbish chutes. The rats caught were killed. Since last Thursday, pest controllers have also placed poison in rat burrows.

    On Monday night, The Straits Times spotted more than 10 burrows, two live rats and a dead one on the pavement next to the coffee shop.

    An ECTC spokesman said residents can expect to see rat carcasses in the area during the exercise, which will last until early next month. Residents are advised to call the town council so it can send workers to remove the carcasses.

    She also urged residents to help control the rat population by eliminating food sources, possibly scraps left over from the feeding of stray cats and pigeons.

    The National Environment Agency (NEA) said it received several complaints about rats around Block 70 late last month. Inspections found 16 burrows and rat droppings in a bin centre and two food shops, which have since been given warnings.

    Its officers have spoken to the owners and occupiers of the shops on proper waste disposal.

    NEA also said it is working with the town council to step up estate cleaning and maintenance of the rubbish chutes

    The Straits Times understands that a metal disposal container was installed this year at the Food Park food court to improve its waste management. Before that, scraps went into pails without lids.

    Mr John Teo, 70, who lives in Bedok South’s Block 69, said the rat population grew in the last eight months. The taxi driver, who watches television with his friends at Food Park every night, added: “In the last two to three months, there are smaller ones appearing, which means they are breeding.”

    Another resident, Mr Tan Teck Chin, 47, said: “It’s a bit uncomfortable to eat and see rats so near.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Revised Registers Of Electors Certified, Open For Public Inspection

    Revised Registers Of Electors Certified, Open For Public Inspection

    The revised registers of electors have been certified and are now open for public inspection.

    In a statement today, the Elections Department revealed that there are a total of 2,460,484 voters on the rolls.

    Eligible voters may check their particulars at the Elections Department or at community centres with their NRIC or passport, or online at the Elections Department website.

    Those overseas can also check their particulars at the 10 overseas missions that serve as overseas registration centres.

    People whose names were removed from the voter rolls because they failed to vote at a previous election may continue to apply to have their names restored, the Elections Department said.

    Meanwhile, eligible voters who are overseas, and who have resided in Singapore for at least 30 days between Feb 1, 2012 and Jan 31, 2015, may register as overseas electors to vote at a designated overseas polling station.

    With the revision to the rolls, Singaporeans overseas who had previously registered as overseas voters will also need to re-register.

    The Elections Department added that those applying to restore their names to the rolls or to register as an overseas voter should do so early, as applications will close when the Writ of Election is issued.

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Background Story: PROTESTERS SEEN HOLDING PLACARDS OUTSIDE THE ISTANA TODAY

    TRS got in contact with the two men who were involved in the peaceful protest outside the Istana on Saturday afternoon and found out why they chose to do what they did despite knowing that they would be arrested. They shared that they wanted to exercise their constitutional rights and believe strongly that they have not disturbed public order.

    Here is what they wanted to tell the public about their peaceful protest:

    We are the two men who held the demonstration outside the gates of the Istana on the 4th April 2015. You can simply address us as X and Y. Our names are irrelevant, but not our cause. Martyrdom is not the goal. We apologise if the subject of the protest (Freedom of Speech for Singaporeans) was not very clear. It was intentionally vague so as to sidestep any unnecessary charges that could be pinned on us by the Authorities; such as Libel/Defamation.

    The both of us are Singaporeans, and not FTs (as some of you have speculated). We do not represent any political party, nor are we affiliated with any groups/organisations. Who we are, are simply two men who believe there has been Injustice done towards those who offered a differing opinion and dared to raise questions considered to be “touchy”.

    Let us clarify: We are not anti LKY. We take our hats off to him, and appreciate all that he has done for Singapore; giving his life in creating a “safe”, prosperous nation and environment for us to thrive in. However, for far too long, dissent has been dealt with very severely, and sometimes, downright inhumanely. We believe in Change, and correcting Injustice wherever we see it.

    The defamation suit against Mr Roy Ngerng was ridiculous. He simply raised questions on the behalf of the citizens of Singapore. Instead of getting a proper, well structured reply from the relevant authorities, he was dealt with by a lawsuit, and subsequently fired from his job in Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Ruining a person’s life when he simply asks questions (not for his own sake, no less) seems to be the norm in Singapore. Is this not Injustice? Should we turn a blind eye to this?

    We also refer to the action taken on Mr Amos Yee. While we do think that the commentary was vulgar, rude, and frankly, a little insensitive (given the time); we do not see the need for him to be brought to court. Any sane society would have challenged all his points based on the facts and opinions he presented (in the video), and negated the points of his arguments with sound logic and reasoning. Instead, we as a society has chosen to shy away from the difficult questions raised, and opted to cower behind the might of the SPF.

    To be subjugated to arrest for airing an opinion (unpopular as it is) borders on the unthinkable. When someone takes office, they sign all rights to privacy away. They become a Public Figure, subject to the scrutinity of everyone. Such is the burden of representing the People. It is only logical that if tributes and praise flow free; so should criticism and insult.

    Some have questioned us why did we not go through the “proper” channels (such as Speaker’s Corner in Hong Lim Park). The appointment of a “place to speak” seems as if the park was designated to be a “dumping ground” for dissent, masquerading as a “designated place” for “Freedom of Expression”. What Change was there to be had if this was the case? Why should Singaporeans be confined to the space of Hong Lim Park? Is this truly “Freedom of Expression” then? We think not. It is perfectly within our rights in the Constitution (Article 14) to hold a peaceful demonstration, anywhere in Singapore.

    14.— (1) Subject to clauses (2) and (3) —

    (a) every citizen of Singapore has the right to freedom of speech and expression;

    (b) all citizens of Singapore have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; and

    (c) all citizens of Singapore have the right to form associations.

    The action that we took on the 4th of April 2015 was our right as stated in the Singapore Constitution. It did not cause disruption of the Public Order, defame anyone nor incited any form of civil unrest. We knew being arrested would be a given (and we were willing to shoulder that to make a statement), but the extent of it eluded us.

    Following our arrest, we were detained for a day by the Police. Both of us were brought in restraints to our homes. Electronic devices like desktop CPUs and handphones were seized for investigation.

    The right/wrong of our action, although open for debate, is not the point. The red we wore was to signify Change. So long as it sparked Singaporeans questioning what Freedom truly means to them, then our objective has been reached. Whoever is in Power (the ruling party) matters not to us; it could be the PAP, the SDP, or the WP. That is immaterial. What matters, is that they realise that we are ready for Change as a society. If you equate Freedom with wanton acts of violence and instability, then you are sorely mistaken and have missed the point entirely.

    Alejandro Jodorowsky – “Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.”

    X and Y

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

deneme bonusu