Tag: Singaporeans

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy On Islam And Discrimination Of Malays Should Not Be allowed To Perpetuate

    Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy On Islam And Discrimination Of Malays Should Not Be allowed To Perpetuate

    Alhamdulillah, most of my friends are those who have not been indoctrinated.

    There are Muslims who have good intentions but lack political understanding. They assume that with his death, LKY does not have any further effect on Muslims. We should then move forward and not discuss him anymore.

    But that is the problem when someone lack appreciation of political narratives and try to make a claim on political effects. Let me make this simple to understand. An institution is made up of 3 primary components: routines, expected behaviour and shared goals. The government is an institution through the existence of the 3 characteristics.

    The shared goals (or shared reality) is a set of ideas, values, philosophies that are developed through the institution. In the PAP and government, how Muslims are engaged and treated owes a lot to Lee Kuan Yew’s views of reducing Islam to its bare minimum

    His demands for rejection of various aspects of Islam were not adopted through any objective measure. Rather, they were granted legitimacy simply through the force of his demands.

    Ideas do not die with the death of its advocates. They live on. The way Lee Kuan Yew discriminates the Muslims, lives beyond his natural life.

    Thus, the only way to challenge the ideas and halt its promotion is to challenge the narrative surrounding Lee Kuan Yew. Delegitimise his interaction and management of the community and his ideas of how the Muslims should be discriminated (while pretending to support) loses currency.

    So for those who want to keep quiet and accept his legacy, that is your right. Do that. Those who want to promote him as the spirit of Singapore’s development, you can do that too.

    The rest of us will tear down the fiction of Lee Kuan Yew’s history. Not because we want to discuss the man.

    But because his ideas on how the community should be discriminated and how Islam should be rejected cannot be allowed to live on.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • The Lee Kuan Yew Foundation

    The Lee Kuan Yew Foundation

    Lee Kuan Yew was a giant revered for his brilliant mind, shrewd political instinct, and fearless candor. In the week since his passing, we’ve reminisced about his life – beginning the debate over his legacy and how we will remember him.

    Singaporeans from all walks of life have shared how Lee Kuan Yew touched them, whether through small gestures of warmth or the grand gesture of stewarding us into the nation we are. The story of how he took the CIA to task about an allegedbribery scandal in 1960 lit up social media, with Singaporeans taking pride in the maverick that Lee Kuan Yew was. Leaders from every corner of the globe have taken turns to shower acclaim on his life, his success and his counsel. For their part, his detractors have cautioned against an overly effusive telling of the Lee Kuan Yew story, pointing to his social engineering, lawsuits against the press, and treatment of political opponents.

    Whoever is right, it is indisputable that Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy towers over Singapore like the skyscrapers that dominate the new Marina Bay skyline. Never ornate, their clean lines exemplify the future orientation and simplicity that Lee Kuan Yew adopted in tackling Singapore’s challenges. They can be seen from miles away, commanding an undeniable presence.

    But as with the skyscrapers, it is easy to forget that Lee Kuan Yew’s accomplishments rest on a foundation of unconventional thinking.

    The People’s Action Party was founded in response to his belief that the status quo, Singapore under the British, was no longer right for the country – he fought forMerdeka. He maintained a fearlessness to “defy conventional wisdom” and in the process transformed a society “from where it is to where it has never been – indeed, where it as yet cannot imagine being”. This, in Henry Kissinger’s words, is what makes him a “great leader” and is the same boldness of mind that led to many of Singapore’s audacious projects, including the Marina Bay land reclamation project in the 1970s that literally laid the ground for the pillars that rise from it today.

    These were the building blocks of Lee Kuan Yew’s power as a transformative figure: an enterprising instinct, unconstrained by existing authority or the way things had been; an unmitigated pragmatism that called things as they were – so as to fix them; an ambitious vision, buoyed by compassion. It was unencumbered brilliance that, in his own words, was about trying to be “correct, not politically correct”.

    If Lee Kuan Yew had bowed to his critics, we might still be raw ingredients, separated by race, language or religion. He and his team provided the sweet sauce to bring the rojak together – even if it meant limiting our right to choose what language to study, where to live, or whom to live among.

    Today, new divisions are developing in Singaporean society. We need the same innovativeness – not simply the same policies – to face these new challenges. In a speech to the Singapore Press Club in 1996, he said: “Thirty years ago, my colleagues, younger and more dreamy eyed, settled the words of our pledge. We did not focus our minds on our navels or we would have missed the rainbow in the sky. We pursued that rainbow and that was how we came to build today’s Singapore.”

    His eyes were always fixed on making Singapore better, scanning the horizon without the glare of the past. It is our turn to do the same.

    Like Lee Kuan Yew who stood on the foundation of his British education to build a stronger Singapore without the British, we too must stand on the foundation of his legacy to build a stronger Singapore than we already have, now that we have lost him. And like him, we must fight for it, regardless of the powers that be.

    But we cannot allow his legacy to be constrained by his policies, his past successes, or his party. As important as they are, they are temporal, as was he. Buildings get torn down, political parties gain and lose dominance, ideas lose currency – the world will change, and we must adapt along with it.

    Lee Kuan Yew knew this. In his latest memoir, he wrote, “because of my house, neighbouring houses cannot be built high. (…) Demolish my house, change the planning rules, and the land value will go up. I don’t think my daughter or my wife or I, who lived in it, or my sons who grew up in it, will bemoan its loss.” In the same vein, we mustn’t overly sentimentalize the structures that Lee Kuan Yew built; his legacy must not become the convention he so often combated against.

    He is the father of modern day Singapore not because he leaves us with towering skyscrapers where there once was water, nor because he’s lifted us to a standard of living unimaginable fifty years ago. It is because he leaves behind a people inspired by his bold vision of a stronger Singapore and a blueprint for how to make it possible through his example: his independence and pioneering spirit; his fearlessness in the face of stark odds; his pragmatism, compassion and passion for the cause of Singapore.

    These are the characteristics that made him the man he was and is the enduring legacy that we must be thankful for and live up to.

    It is perhaps fitting that, like Lee Kuan Yew who wept at the shattering of a union he so fervently believed in, Singaporeans today mourn the end of a union that has been at our very heart. In Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s words, “Lee Kuan Yew was Singapore”. His values are the true inheritance a father has bequeathed to his nation – values we must remember, keep safe, and do proud.

    Thank you, Mr Lee.

     

    Source: http://singaporepolicyjournal.com

  • Hussin Mutalib: There Are Better Ways To Remember Contributions Of Lee Kuan Yew

    Hussin Mutalib: There Are Better Ways To Remember Contributions Of Lee Kuan Yew

    As Singaporeans, we will remember Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s contributions, sacrifices and legacies. Let us forge a consensus on how best to value his imprint on Singapore.

    Some suggestions have been aired, including erecting a statue, declaring the date of his death a public holiday and renaming iconic edifices such as Merdeka Bridge and Changi Airport, with the latter the subject of an online petition.

    Garnering signatures and pressuring our Government via petitions is not the best way to pay tribute to him. In fact, it dishonours one of his governing principles, namely, not to rule by populist pressures.

    Lest we forget, our Government has turned down previous petitions with greater popular support.

    Before we proceed to find more meaningful ways to acknowledge his leadership role in transforming Singapore to what it is today, we should perhaps list the institutions, programmes, endowments, scholarships, et cetera, that already bear his name.

    This would enable us to see what can be done to accord greater credence to his contributions and to do so proportionately without going overboard.

    In our zeal to honour him, let us not ape what some countries have done, namely, deifying the status of their leaders. While Mr Lee’s standing as the founder of modern Singapore is recognised, we should not overlook the indefatigable support and sacrifice of his Cabinet lieutenants and other comrades since the 1950s, as well as many segments of Singapore society.

    His death also offers us a timely, if not golden, opportunity to reflect on his legacies. Our guiding principle should be the commitment to continue his positive, praiseworthy policies, and a determination to review and leave behind his less acceptable vestiges.

    If we approach his passing in this dignified, tempered manner, his contributions would not be in vain and we could prepare and look forward to the next phase of the Singapore story with an even greater sense of inclusiveness, commitment and confidence.

     

    *This commentary by Hussin Mutalib first appeared on  Voices, Today, on 6 Apr 2015.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • More Booking Tours On Long National Day Weekend

    More Booking Tours On Long National Day Weekend

    Following the announcement of a long National Day weekend from Aug 7 to 10, tour agencies said they are seeing a spike in bookings.

    According to some agencies, there has been a 30 per cent increase in tour bookings for the extended National Day weekend, with some saying trips to nearby countries such as Thailand and Hong Kong are almost fully booked.

    Numbers are expected to increase further, said the agencies, and companies have also approached the agencies for corporate bookings to reward staff.

    BOOKINGS IN LOCAL HOTELS UP

    However, not all are heading overseas, with local hotels reporting an increase in bookings for the weekend. Some hotels said that about 90 per cent of their rooms with a view of the parade have already been reserved, while others have introduced special packages to celebrate the nation’s Golden Jubilee.

    “If they have done a 3-day booking, we’re obviously going to contact them again and offer the package over the four days because it is not fair that they didn’t know, so this is the government generosity of adding an extra day, which is terrific,” said Antoine Chahwan, Regional Vice President, Four Seasons Hotel. “To celebrate Singapore’s 50, I’m sure a lot of people will stay in Singapore to be part of this great celebrations.”

    Previously, Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob urged Singaporeans to remain in the country during the long weekend to celebrate the nation’s 50th birthday instead of travelling overseas.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Police Investigating Alleged Case Of Physical Abuse Against Businessman

    Police Investigating Alleged Case Of Physical Abuse Against Businessman

    The police are investigating a complaint that its officers physically abused a 41-year-old Singaporean man during a spot check it conducted at a nightclub on Friday morning (April 3).

    The allegation was first reported by sociopolitical website The Online Citizen (TOC) yesterday. It posted photos of businessman Lim Chin Huat with injuries on his face and a bandaged arm, as well as a 37-second video clip showing officers trying to get a handcuffed Mr Lim into a police car.

    In response to TODAY’s queries, the police said they conducted a spot check at a public entertainment outlet located at Bras Basah Road at about 1:15am. Subsequently, a 41-year-old Singaporean man was arrested for disorderly behaviour and police investigations are ongoing.

    The police spokesperson also confirmed that a report was lodged, alleging abuse by officers during the arrest. “Investigations into the veracity of the allegations are ongoing,” he added.

    In a phone interview today, Mr Lim said he was drinking with a group of business partners at Yang Gui Fei nightclub in Hotel Rendezvous that day when plainclothes police officers entered the outlet and asked for their identification cards.

    As the officers’ police identity tags were facing inwards, he asked for their names but could not hear their replies. Subsequently, he tried to flip an officer’s tag but was told that he was not allowed to do so.

    Mr Lim said he apologised but the officers pinned him on the ground and handcuffed him, without explaining why he was arrested. He added that the officers also hit his face with their knees and stopped only when his friends told them that he was bleeding.

    “It happened too fast, the whole process (took) about 5 to 10 minutes,” said Mr Lim, who runs a logistics and engineering business.

    After being admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital that day, Mr Lim said an investigating officer came to take his statement at around noon on Saturday. He also said he suffered from a fractured nose, arm and had bruises near his ear, eyes and head. He was given 10 days of medical leave and will have to return to the hospital for plastic surgery on his nose.

    Mr Lim denied that he was drunk, adding that eight of them had shared two towers of beer that night.

    The police spokesperson said it takes “a serious view of all complaints made against officers”.

    “Such complaints will be thoroughly investigated and if substantiated, the police will not hesitate to take action against any errant officer(s),” he said.

    The spokesperson added that appropriate legal action will be taken against any persons who furnish false information, which is punishable with up to one year’s imprisonment and/or a fine not excedding S$5,000.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu