Tag: Singaporeans

  • Probation Sentence Overturned, Voyeur Going To Jail

    Probation Sentence Overturned, Voyeur Going To Jail

    A man who was initially given probation for various offences, including filming family members of his girlfriend in the shower, making an up-skirt video, and possessing 10,574 obscene films, will be heading to jail after all.

    In his ruling on Tuesday (Mar 17), Justice Chan Seng Onn described the initial sentence as “manifestly inadequate” and ordered that Chong Hou En be jailed for 16 weeks.

    The prosecution had appealed against Chong’s sentence of 30 months’ split probation.

    The 29-year-old had been convicted of five counts of insulting the modesty of a woman by intruding on her privacy. Back in 2011, he was caught red-handed by a victim’s husband, filming an up-skirt video at IMM shopping mall in Jurong. The former labour relations officer had stuck a mini-camera to the tip of his shoe for this purpose.

    Following his arrest for that up-skirt video, subsequent investigations uncovered thousands of obscene videos in his computer.

    It was also found that Chong installed a camera disguised as a lighter in the toilet of his girlfriend’s parents’ home from August 2010. Thereafter, he filmed her older sister, his girlfriend’s two nieces, aged 10 and 12 at the time, and his girlfriend’s sister-in-law.

    Justice Chan noted that in sentencing Chong to probation, the district judge had placed considerable weight on medical evidence that Chong was suffering from the psychiatric condition of voyeurism.

    However, in his judgement, Justice Chan took into account aggravating factors such as the high degree of planning and premeditation in Chong’s acts, and the fact that there were multiple victims – two of them very young.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Aaron Aziz: I Want To Give Artistes The Break They Never Had

    Aaron Aziz: I Want To Give Artistes The Break They Never Had

    Aaron Aziz is glad that Singapore hasn’t forgotten him, because he hasn’t forgotten Singapore. This week, the actor and producer returns to MediaCorp TV Channel 5 to star in the new sitcom Meet The MP as Danial Razali, a newly elected Member of Parliament (MP) clearly out of his depth among the quirky residents of his constituency. The show also stars Oon Shu An, R Chandra and Zhu Mimi.

    Having spent the past decade growing his career in Malaysia, the 39-year-old jumps at opportunities to work here, as well as to use his influence to help other Singaporean entertainers expand their market. And for him, spending time here is always nostalgic.

    “It felt so good to be back. I’m just happy that I’m not totally forgotten,” he said.

    Far from it — even his original fan club is still intact. “They are still friends,” he revealed. “Back then, they were still in school. Some of them are now married with kids and hold professional jobs.”

    Neither has he forgotten his pre-movie-star years. Shooting Meet The MP in Housing and Development Board estates brought back lots of memories for Aaron (“we don’t have those kinds of blocks in Malaysia”), especially of the time he spent working on four seasons of the popular police TV series Heartlanders. He would reminisce: “I used to wait at this spot for cabs. This is where I used to play soccer. I used to run behind that block and steal Vincent’s perfume! Vincent Ng always brought his perfume everywhere.”

    “Danial in Meet The MP — I see the real me in him. He’s here, but he’s not really here. He has been missing out on so much and things are just not how they used to be. They don’t run things like how they used to. That’s where I feel I am right now.”

    Over in Malaysia, he said, things can get a little crazy. “It’s work, work, work — I don’t even have time to have flashbacks — old memories, sweet memories. Everything’s all about the future and, ‘Let’s do more, do more.’ But I don’t want to forget the past.”

    When one returns home after years abroad, even the disappearance of one’s favourite cafe can be rather symbolic. “There used to be a Delifrance at Wisma Atria. Is it still called Wisma? That was my spot,” Aaron recalled. “I would just sit there, especially during the Christmas season when Orchard Road was lit up, have a cup of coffee, and just look at people having nice conversations. I want to do that again — but I can’t. Where is my Delifrance?”

    He laughed: “I hope this is not some kind of turning-40 syndrome.”

    GIVING PEOPLE WHAT THEY NEVER HAD

    With the big 4-0 looming next year, Aaron doesn’t know if he’s feeling a crisis coming on. The only thing he’s sure of is that he has changed.

    “I just don’t see myself being angry any more,” he said. “I used to be someone who, for example, if I saw a dad spanking a child in public, I would want to go to the dad and smack him back. But now, I would go to the child and pacify him, then the father. I’ve gone in that direction: I’m not going to give you back what you’ve given to other people — I’m just going to give them what they’ve never had.”

    That’s why he feels it’s important for him to do his part for other Singaporeans looking for their big break. “I’ve always wanted for my fellow countrymen who are in the industry to expand their horizons. I want them to soar,” he said. “Knowing that some Malay actors here have not even done film — how sad does that sound? That’s why, whenever a director or producer in Malaysia says, ‘Aaron, do you know any new faces?’ I call my Singaporean friends. Like the MP, I have connections!”

    Some Singaporean names who owe their success across the Causeway to him are actors Adi Putra, Shah Iskandar and Suhaila Salam; stylist Fatimah Mohsin; and hip-hop duo Sleeq, whom he manages. “I always tell (Sleeq), ‘You come to Malaysia already sorted — you have a car and a manager’. I came here with nothing. I learnt the hard way,” he said. “I tell them, ‘Don’t ever stop working hard and don’t change.’

    “The problem with youngsters these days is that after they’ve been in the industry for two years and they get popular, they turn diva. You’re killing your own career. I say, ‘Don’t come to Malaysia and be a diva and make people start to hate Singaporean actors.’ There is a lot of damage repair that I’ve done (for the reputation of Singaporean actors in Malaysia), so don’t go f*** it up. When I do meet these people, I give them my two cents’ worth. They just need to stop thinking that once you’re up, you can never go down. No way, man.”

    ‘I’M LIKE JENGA’

    There’s no doubt that Aaron himself is still “up” there and influential. But the idea of going into politics for real cracks him up. “I’d make a screwed-up MP,” he laughed. “I would not run the place properly. We would have chewing gum back. Let’s have chewing gum back! You need to chew your misery away!”

    However, there’s one aspect in which he would make a good candidate for political office: He’s famously scandal-free, although he isn’t so sure that’s a plus point. “There’s a danger there, you know. I’m like Jenga. They’re just waiting for me to drop one brick, so they can see me tumbling down,” he said. “It doesn’t stress me because I don’t see the need to go in that direction, but because they are waiting for the slightest mistake, the dumbest thing can be made into an issue.

    “Come on, find something else to talk about instead of writing rubbish, lah.”

    He can think of another reason not to run for office: “People wouldn’t take me seriously.” In fact, people already don’t take him for who he is. The reason being that he has done so well in two genres – romantic comedies such as Ombak Rindu and action flicks such as KL Gangster. His image in people’s minds is either that of the romantic hero or the tough guy.

    “Some people see me as loving husband and father: ‘Aaron, you cannot fight. You have to do love scenes.’ Other people are like, ‘No! You have to do action!’ So, no one is going to take me seriously, because no one takes me for who I am. They think I am the person they see onscreen. I’ve become – I don’t know what you call it – a product, or whatever.”

    The real Aaron Aziz, he said, is a bit of both the lover and the fighter. “Some actors tell me they get carried away because they just don’t know how to get out of their character, even after the show is done. I say, ‘Bulls***.’ You get cast because they see something that is you in the character. If everybody could act in that role, they wouldn’t have to do casting,” he stated.

    Going forward, there’s nothing he would like more than to break out of those two stereotypes, although that may take some time to achieve: He’s going to start shooting another romantic film soon. “I used to do roles that people want. I don’t want to do that any more. I want to do roles that I’ve never even given myself the opportunity to like or dislike,” he said. “It has always been, ‘You should and you must. You did too many love stories; let’s do action. Oh, too much action — let’s do a love story.’ There has been a whole team planning what to do with my life. Now, I want to do what I want.”

    And what does he want? “I want to play a character based on a factual event,” he said. “But not as someone famous. Someone nobody even knows about until you learn about him, like the guy who walked 50km to work in the United States every day until somebody gave him a car. Characters that make you think, ‘My gosh, I didn’t know this kind of suffering existed.’”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singapore Diabetes Patients Among The Youngest In Asia

    Singapore Diabetes Patients Among The Youngest In Asia

    A new local study on patients with type 2 diabetes across nine Asian territories showed that Singapore has the highest proportion of younger patients.

    The study among 319 patients was conducted by the Asian Diabetes Foundation from 2012 to 2014, and included patients from Singapore, Thailand, China, the Philippines, Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.

    The study found that three in 10 patients in Singapore had diabetes before turning 40.

    Younger patients also fared poorly in terms of glucose control, hypertension and cholesterol management compared to older patients.

    Hence, doctors said it is timely that a new drug called JANUMET XR was approved by the Health Sciences Authority last year to help patients with type 2 diabetes maintain their blood sugar level.

    Currently, patients require multiple drugs for blood sugar control. But doctors said this new drug, which combines two powerful diabetic agents, will help to lower patients’ glucose levels in one dose.

    A total of 498,190 people in Singapore have type 2 diabetes and achieving glycaemic control continues to be a challenge for people with diabetes.

    “Diabetes has no symptoms. Because of that people do not care — they think they are doing well,” said Dr Ben Ng, a consultant physician at Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Medical Centre. “On top of that, many other lifestyle issues such as too good a diet, lack of exercise and a sedentary lifestyle all contribute to increasing weight and rate of diabetes.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Barren Land At Bukit Batok Not Due To Pest Extermination

    Barren Land At Bukit Batok Not Due To Pest Extermination

    A significant amount of vegetation that once grew on the hill beside Bukit Batok MRT station has been cleared, about three months after it made headlines for being infested with hundred of rats.

    However, the barren land is not the result of an operation to weed out rats, said pest controllers.

    “I believe (authorities) are doing their so-called routine maintenance, but this time round they’re doing a bit more. Actually, it comes after our exercise. They didn’t want to do this earlier so as not to jeopardise the whole rodent removal exercise,” said Mr Bernard Chan, general manager at Star Pest Control.

    The hill had been declared “rat-free” in early January.

    When contacted, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) said it was carrying out clearance to “better maintain the land”. HDB said that the “bare” portion of the land is temporary as re-turfing is being carried out.

    Star Pest Control said it has not discovered any new signs of rats in the area. It said the rodents could return if people do not dispose of food properly, or feed strays, providing a supply of food for the rats.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Did PAP Activists Break Law In Distributing Flyers?

    Did PAP Activists Break Law In Distributing Flyers?

    By Ariffin Sha

    A team of activists from the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had distributed flyers urging residents of Aljunied GRC to question the Workers’ Party past midnight last Friday. Enough have been said about the morals, or lack thereof, of their antics. I would now like to explore whether the actions of these activists were even legal in the first place.

    Mr Pillai and Mr Lye from PAP Aljunied
    Mr Pillai and Mr Lye from PAP Aljunied

    To start, we should also note that PAP activists Victor Lye, who made a Facebook post thanking his team for distributing the fliers, and Muralidharan Pillai, who confirmed to media that the flyers were from PAP, have both clearly indicated the origins of the flyers. In spite of that, the documents in question do not carry any PAP logo. The flyers were also distributed past midnight, as if done to avoid direct contact with residents.

    Notwithstanding the highly mysterious and secretive air surrounding the distribution, Muralidharan had insisted to media that they had nothing to hide and that “there was no difficulty in understanding that (the flyer) was from the PAP”.

    Precedence set by the SDP

    CSC_taipei
    Ms Chee Siok Chin was jailed for a week for distributing flyers which were critical of the Government.

    In 2008, six members of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) were charged for distributing flyers which were critical of the government.

    Their charge sheet read:

    You are charged that you, on the 10th day of September 2006 at about 12:15 pm, in the vicinity of Raffles City Shopping Centre, North Bridge Road, Singapore, which is a public place, together with 5 persons did participate in an assembly intended to demonstrate opposition to the actions of the Government, which assembly you ought reasonably to have known was held without a permit under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) (Assemblies & Processions) Rules, and you have thereby committed an offence punishable under Rule 5 of the said Rules.

    Mark Chua
    Senior Investigation Officer
    Central Police Division
    29 December 2008

    The SDP members were charged under Rule 5 of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) (Assemblies & Processions) Rules which states: Any person who participates in any assembly or processions in any public road, public place or place of public resort shall, if he knows or ought reasonably to have known that the assembly or processions is held without a permit, or in contravention of any term or condition of a permit, be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,000.

    Here’s what political blogger Alex Au had to say about the charge,

    It is difficult to imagine that the legislative intent of this law was to curb the handing out of flyers, or similar communicative-type activity. I daresay the law was meant to prohibit gatherings that pose a threat to public peace, e.g. gangs out to intimidate or fight, or sit-ins that block traffic. The name of the law, after all, is Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act.

    Moreover, in actual practice, no action is taken against the hundreds, if not thousands, of people who stand at metro stations handing out flyers, or even those who interfere with traffic in some way, e.g. stopping people to sell them insurance

    The point made by Mr Au definitely makes sense – the execution of laws should target the intended consequence, rather than the offending act itself. Unfortunately, the way the law was applied in the case must be taken into account in evaluating the present facts.

    In the judgement passed by District Judge Chng Lye Beng, it is understood that, if a group of five or more persons distribute flyers of a political nature in a public place without a permit, they may likely be in breach of the law. Let us now compare the first three elements of the offence with the facts of the case at hand.

    Five or more persons?

    After the distribution of the flyers, Mr Lye posted this image on his Facebook page. According to his post, the people featured in this picture are the “(PAP) activists who worked through the night… to distribute flyers.” From this picture, one can easily make out seven people, which suggests that there were more than five people who helped to distribute the flyers. There might also have been more who helped out in the distribution but were not featured in this photo.

    Post on Victor Lye's Facebook page after the flyer distribution
    Post on Mr Lye’s Facebook page after the flyer distribution

    Public places?

    The flyers in question were placed at the doors of HDB flats, as seen in the picture above. This means that Mr Lye and his team were operating at the common corridors of HDB flats. It is also clear from the photographs taken from Mr Lye’s Facebook page that the flyers were left outside the flats – which suggests that they in no way entered into the home, or what might be considered private property.

    11050293_371969052987438_8104791816725069615_n

    Flyers of political nature?

    To give the reader a better understanding of what would constitute ‘political nature’, it would be good to look at the contents of the flyers that the SDP members distributed. The flyers contained the following words:

    Tired of being a voiceless, 2nd class citizen in your own country without any rights? Sick of the Ministers paying themselves millions of dollars while they tell you to keep making sacrifices for Singapore? Then join us for the

    EMPOWER SINGAPOREANS

    RALLY & MARCH

    Saturday, 16 Sept 2006, 11 am

    Speakers’ Corner, Hong Lim Park

    FOR MORE INFORMATION, GO TO

    www.singaporedemocrat.org

    In comparison. here are the contents of the flyers that the PAP activists distributed:

    14074_10152799050882572_1466207900273815480_n

    Comparing the contents of the two flyers, I opine that if the former can be constituted to be of a political nature, the latter undoubtedly is of a political nature too. The later also makes explicit references to the Workers’ Party and its Town Councils which should dissipate any doubts one may have about the political nature of the flyers.

    Without a permit?

    Prima Facie, it seems as though the actions of the PAP Aljunied team on Friday evening have satisfied the first three elements of the offence. In other words, Mr Lye and his team of five or more persons did distribute flyers which were of a political nature in a public place.

    The question now would really be whether they had a permit for the distribution of the flyers. Both Mr Lye and Mr Muralidharan had not any any point in time produced any evidence to show that a permit has been obtained. If they do not have such a permit, they would technically be in breach of the law.

    Alternative charge of Sedition

    However, the SDP is not the only precedence we have of people distributing flyers without a permit and getting into trouble for doing so.

    In what was popularly referred to as the “poison letters“, a flyer that was critical of the PAP was distributed to residents in the heartlands via letter boxes. The Strait Times described the flyer as “an A4-sized sheet with the criticisms in English and Chinese, made allegations about corruption and exploitation and complained about cost of living issues, among other things.”

    sengkangflyerc01

    It was reported that Police investigations were ongoing although we didn’t get to hear the end of the matter. TODAY reported that the flier was in breach of the Sedition Act which states, among other things, that a seditious tendency is one which seek:

    (a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;

    (b) to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;

    (c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;

    (d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore

    The “poison letter” incident raises another bag of issues for the PAP flyer distribution in Aljunied GRC. While the target of the flyers – the Workers Party – do not form the government, its members are rightfully elected Members of Parliament, who are part legislative arm of the government. The contents of the flyers might possibly be also be construed instigate dissatisfaction among the residents of Aljunied against WP. Might it have the consequence of causing political unrest? The potential is unthinkable. However, to a certain extent, it may be possible to interpret the contents of the flyers to amount to a “seditious tendency” under subsections (b) and (d).

    Conclusion

    Ultimately, if this case ever goes before the courts, the issue of the legality of the flyer distribution lies with the Judiciary. Personally, I do hope that it never will, just as I wished the case of SDP and the “poison letter” never did. Even though I believe the actions of Mr Lye and team are akin to a political lowblow, I am of the firm opinion that, as far as the law is concerned, they should be free to do what they do – just like how all political parties distribute flyers during their house visits. I an no fan of laws that can be interpreted and applied in a manner that is over-reaching and discretionary.

    However, should a police report be made by a recipient of the flyers against the PAP activists, might it be an uphill task for PAP activists to justify the legality of this flyer distribution?

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

deneme bonusu