Tag: Singaporeans

  • Full-Time NSman Jailed 19 Weeks For Filming Upskirt Videos of Unsuspecting Victims

    Full-Time NSman Jailed 19 Weeks For Filming Upskirt Videos of Unsuspecting Victims

    A full-time national serviceman who committed 19 “upskirt” offences, mostly at MRT stations, was jailed for nine weeks on Wednesday.

    Muhammad Raimi Kadir, 21, admitted seven of 19 charges of intruding women’s privacy by secretly filming them between November 2012 and September last year.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor James Chew told the court that once Raimi spotted a woman with a short skirt, he would follow her from behind until they reached the escalator.

    He would stand behind the victim, switch on his camera then place it under her skirt to capture a recording or photograph of her thighs and underwear.

    As well as MRT stations such as Bugis, Lorong Chuan, MacPherson and Tanah Merah, Raimi also committed the offence at ITE College Central in Ang Mo Kio.

    He was arrested by two officers near Bugis MRT station on Sept 8 last year for behaving suspiciously.

    Raimi had earlier taken an eight-second upskirt video recording of a woman at Bugis+ mall while standing behind her on the escalator.

    The cops found similar videos and photographs stored in his camera and took him to the station for investigation.

    Twenty days later, Clementi police officers saw Raimi behaving suspiciously in front of Clementi Mall and approached him. He fled but they managed to detain him.

    Upskirt photographs and a video were found in the electronic gadgets he was carrying.

    Police searched his home and seized several electronic items containing offending material.

    Pleading for a lighter sentence, Raimi said in mitigation that he committed the offences in a moment of folly. He realised his mistakes and promised to turn over a new leaf.

    He could have been jailed for up to one year and/or fined for each count of insulting modesty.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • MFA Advisory For Singaporeans To Leave Yemen

    MFA Advisory For Singaporeans To Leave Yemen

    The government has issued a travel notice for Singaporeans to leave Yemen.

    “Given the fluid and uncertain security situation in Yemen, Singaporeans are strongly advised to leave the country while it is still feasible,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said.

    MFA also said, “Should the situation further deteriorate, Singaporeans may face difficulties leaving Yemen. Many airlines have already stopped flying in and out of Yemen and those still doing so might cancel their flights with little or no notice.

    “Singaporeans are also strongly advised to avoid all travel to Yemen.”

    Yemen was thrown into a crisis, after former president Ali Abdullah Saleh and his party walked out of the new government. He had rejected the UN Security Council sanctions against him for obstructing peace.

    Singaporeans in Yemen who need consular assistance should immediately contact the MFA Duty Officer (24-hours) at: 6379 8800 / 8855 or [email protected].

    Singaporeans in Yemen should also eRegister immediately at: http://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/ if they have not done so.

  • The Truth Behind Your 13th Month “Bonus”

    The Truth Behind Your 13th Month “Bonus”

    There is only 12 months in a year. When you get paid a ’13th month’ of wages, you will feel delighted, no? No. Why do you think footballers in the English Premier League are paid weekly?

    Ponder over these points.

    Unless you are on commission or special bonus wage schemes, chances are you are paid a fixed amount of money monthly in Singapore.

    Is there a possibility you get paid $10/hour on some days and $12/hour on some days in your course of work over the year? Of course not. You get paid the same rate year in year out, until you get a raise. If that’s the case,

    “Why are you paid the some amount of money in January and February?”

    If you still don’t get it. There are 31 days in January and there are 28 (normally) days in February. The question now – are you overpaid for February or underpaid in January? You choose what you want to believe in.

    To me, February is the only month you get paid correctly in the whole year in Singapore. Employers in Singapore will never overpay you in February. Fat hope and you know it. There are four weeks in a month and we get paid for 28 days in a month. that’s it. Straightforward.

    In short we are underpaid in every other month other than February.

    January – 3 days
    March – 3 days
    April – 2 days
    May – 3 days
    June – 2 days
    July – 3 days
    August – 3 days
    September – 2 days
    October – 3 days
    November – 2 days
    December – 3 days

    3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 = 29 days.

    The shorter way to calculate this would be:

    1 month 4 weeks.
    You get paid 12 times a year = 12 x 4 = 48 weeks.
    There are 52 weeks in a year. 52 – 48 = 4 weeks unpaid

    The fact is that Singapore employers hold 29 days of your pay over the year and could refuse to pay you your rightful money if you did not ‘perform’. Even if they do it, that meant many employees in Singapore did not get any bonuses from their companies at all. The 13th month is your pay. It is Not a bonus!

    In reality, if they pay us back the ’13th month bonus’, they employer still owe us 1 day’s wages (29 – 28) and get away with it year after year, decade after decade. If you leave the company before the year is up your ’13th month bonus’ is forfeited instead of pro-rated. That’s robbery.

    This is ridiculous. The manpower laws in Singapore are not stopping the businesses against such unfair practices and the NTUC is not doing their job fighting for the rights of workers.

    The next time you receive your “13th month bonus”, ask yourself why are you feeling so happy getting back what you deserve in the first place?

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Security Guards Better To Be Seen Not Heard?

    Security Guards Better To Be Seen Not Heard?

    It was 7.45am when I reported for duty at the guardhouse of an upscale condominium in District 9, dressed in my uniform of white shirt and dark blue trousers.

    Mr Johari, a middle-aged guard who had been working there for two years, showed me the ropes and the first thing he said to me was: “Watch out for the cars.”

    He meant I would have to memorise some residents’ car registration numbers in a hurry if I was going to do the job right.

    Helpfully, he rattled off some critical numbers: 30, 166, 186, 2125. Those were the car numbers of residents who expected the guards to recognise them and lift the carpark barrier quickly when they approached.

    “They will complain if you are slow, like this one who is in the management committee,” he said, as a car drew up. I scribbled the numbers into a notebook.

    My supervisor, Mr Zaini, had another tip: “Make sure you smile.”

    He explained: “People staying here are all ‘somebodies’ and they want to be acknowledged. Don’t ask visitors their names or who they are visiting. They get offended.”

    It made me wonder why this condominium needed guards at all. Why not have a smiling robot of the sort being produced in Japan, that can recognise residents and car numbers? Or give residents remote controls to operate the barriers themselves?

    Mr Zaini said we guards play a role in providing security to the wealthy residents. “It gives them a sense of security to have uniformed guards around,” he said.

    The freehold condominium has only four-bedroom apartments and penthouses above 3,000 sq ft in size. The 100 units are spread out over four five-storey blocks in a sprawling compound about the size of a football field. Besides the swimming pool, gym and function room, it also has a yoga pavilion and lounge. All the apartments have private lifts.

    Over the past two years, some units changed hands for between $10.7 million and $27.5 million.

    Mr Johari told me about half the residents were Singaporeans and the rest were foreign tenants paying more than $15,000 a month in rent.

    The management council hired a private company to provide security guards. A 12-man guard team was assigned there, with six guards on duty on each 12-hour shift and shift changes at 8am and 8pm.

    Each 12-hour shift is further divided into one-hour blocks, with 11 hours of work and a one-hour meal break. The 11 one-hour blocks form a rotating roster, with five guards put on one of five tasks hourly: manning the main guard post, guarding the basement entrance of the clubhouse, operating the carpark barrier, watching CCTV cameras and patrolling the grounds.

    When it was time for my one-hour break at noon, Mr Johari led me to a small makeshift area in a corner of the basement carpark, next to a pump room and out of sight of residents. The stale smelling room was lit by a fluorescent tube. There were metal lockers, a wooden table with chipped corners and four plastic chairs, two of which were shaky. A desk fan provided some comfort.

    When I took my lunch break there, I could see Ferraris, Lamborghinis and a Bentley – some of the residents’ luxury cars – and we security guards had to make sure nobody sneaked pictures of them.

    The guards at this condominium are barred from using the common toilets in the clubhouse and swimming pool. They have their own, also in the basement carpark. It has one toilet bowl and a sink. During my two days there, it had no soap or toilet paper, and the tap was broken.

    Ms Amy, in her 50s, the only female guard in the team, said that she tries to avoid using the toilet and brings her own hand sanitiser.

    I was appalled, but my security guard colleagues did not seem to mind any of this. I brought my own toilet paper and wet wipes on Day 2.

    As a new guard, I was assigned unpopular tasks that kept me on my feet: operating the carpark barrier, guarding the clubhouse entrance and patrolling.

    What I liked least was having to spend an hour stuffing letterboxes with a notice about the swimming pool closure and checking at the start of the day that more than 500 light bulbs in the lift lobbies, walkways and carpark were working.

    For the effort, I was paid $70 a day. My fellow guards at the agency serving this condo are paid between $1,800 and $1,900 each month. My employer, who has an “A” grade from the annual police grading exercise, pays slightly above the going rate of about $1,700 a month.

    But Mr Johari felt the pay was still too low for the long hours put in. “At our level, we are only working for the money,” he said. “What job satisfaction is there?”

    His salary is well below the median monthly gross salary of $3,480 for Singapore citizens and just below the $1,900 monthly Workfare salary ceiling. And he works 12 hours a day, six days a week.

    In just two days there, I felt my self-esteem being nibbled away, not least because I learnt quickly that a security guard does his job best when he is invisible and doesn’t draw notice to himself. Just smile, do your job, don’t engage with residents, don’t give them any opportunity to complain.

    Over two days, only twice did people thank me.

    A Filipino maid was grateful when I held a door for her and the pram she was pushing, and a CityCab taxi driver said thanks when I pointed him to the guards’ toilet.

    From condo to worksite

    After two days at the upmarket condo, I asked the agency manager for a change and was redeployed to the worksite of a nearly completed private building in Little India.

    I presented myself at 7.45am dressed in the same uniform.

    I arrived to find a woman security guard, seated at a folding metal table, being scolded by a cleaning supervisor. The middle-aged woman had not even begun to eat her roti prata, but the supervisor was scolding her for “dirtying” the place. The truth, I learnt later, was that other workers could use that table for their meals, but not the guards.

    The building, with offices and shops, is not yet open to the public. The guards are there mainly to watch over the contractors putting the finishing touches to the building.

    Here I would be known as Security Officer Toh and I was not told to smile, apparently because I would come into contact mostly with workers and the building’s handful of full-time staff. Unlike at the condo, the guards here were free to use any of the toilets in the uncompleted building, at least for now.

    But there was no proper rest area or lockers, and guards could put their belongings anywhere, as long as they were out of sight. “Put your backpack below the table,” said my supervisor Krishnan, in his 60s.

    Here too, security guards typically work 12-hour shifts, but the duties were less structured and there was no roster of tasks.

    During my two days there, I spent five hours each day guarding the door to a room to make sure no one entered, as it had just been cleaned with chemicals.

    I told Mr Krishnan what the place needed was a lock, not a guard, but he ignored the idea. He snapped: “Why you talk so much? You are a new guard.”

    I was also assigned to patrol the perimeter of the premises. One of my colleagues, Mr Lim, in his 40s, asked if I smoked. “For smokers, going on patrol means you can find a corner to take a smoke,” he said with a smile.

    I do not smoke, but going on patrols allowed me to test the observation skills I had been taught.

    So when I spotted a white van parked illegally near a taxi stand for more than 20 minutes, I reported it to another supervisor, only to have him say: “Leave it to LTA, not our business.” The van’s presence was not entered into the guard room’s official record book, labelled “Occurrence Book”. All it said was: “10 to 11am: SO Toh conducted patrol. Everything normal.”

    Another time, the fire alarm went off. I could not contact my supervisor who was on his meal break, so I did what I had been trained to do.

    I checked the floor under my charge, evacuated a worker to a safe area and reported what I had done to the worksite’s fire control centre. I also made an entry in the record book, as I had been trained to do.

    It turned out to be a false alarm. While I did not expect a pat on my back, I certainly was unprepared for the dressing down that came from the burly security manager, a full-time employee of the building owner.

    Yelling at me for recording the incident, he shouted: “You are trying to be too smart!”

    That was when I learnt that guards were not allowed to write in the record book. They had to write on a piece of paper and show it to the security manager, who would then decide whether to put it in the book. Clearly, it was meant to show only what the security manager wanted to record.

    After the dressing down, I decided I had enough. I told the agency manager I would not be coming to work the next day.

    Mr Krishnan did not bat an eyelid when I said goodbye at the end of my shift. “Relief guards come and go. I am angry that the manager keeps sending inexperienced guards like you to me,” he vented.

    Ending my short stint as a security guard, I remembered Mr Zaini, the condominium supervisor who told me to smile while on the job. He has been a guard for 15 years and I’d asked him how he did it.

    “This is a thankless job,” he said. “Smiling makes it easier for me to get through the long day. And at the end of each day, I smile because it is over and I can get home to my family.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • ICA And MSF: Pick-Up Artist Julian Blanc Will Not Be Allowed To Enter Singapore

    ICA And MSF: Pick-Up Artist Julian Blanc Will Not Be Allowed To Enter Singapore

    Mr Julien Blanc, a self-proclaimed pick-up artist who recently made headlines after his visa was revoked in Australia, will not be allowed into Singapore, announced the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) and Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) in a joint statement on Wednesday (Nov 26).

    “Blanc has been involved in seminars in various countries that advised men to use highly abusive techniques when dating women,” said the ICA and MSF. “Violence against women or any persons is against Singapore law.”

    “The ICA, in consultation with MSF, will not allow Mr Blanc into Singapore, especially if he is here to hold seminars or events that propagate violence against women or to participate in other objectionable activities in Singapore,” they added.

    A Singaporean, Ms Charis Mah, had earlier started a petition asking that Julien Blanc and his group, the Real Social Dynamics, be kept out of Singapore. Ms Mah shared on the petition on Wednesday that the Ministry of Home Affairs had sent her a response on her petition. She wrote: “We took a stand and we did it! Thank you everybody!”

    The petition reached more than 7,500 supporters by Nov 19, said Ms Mah in her online update.

    VIOLENCE AGAINST INNOCENT PEOPLE “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE”: CHAN CHUN SING

    In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Social and Family Development Minister Chan Chun Sing said some have shared their concerns about Mr Blanc and his seminars, advising men on how to use violence against against women when dating them.

    “I share your concerns fully,” he said in the post. “Violence against innocent people is unlawful and totally unacceptable. We cannot allow people to perpetuate such unlawful activities in our country.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com