Category: Singapuraku

  • Faisal Manap Berusaha Kekalkan Kerusi Bagi Penggal Kedua

    Faisal Manap Berusaha Kekalkan Kerusi Bagi Penggal Kedua

    MEREKA menyapa beliau dan menyambut mesra risalah yang dihulurkan, malah ada juga penduduk yang sempat berbisik, “jangan khuatir saya sokong anda”.

    Gelagat dan reaksi positif sedemikian menguatkan lagi azam Encik Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap, 40 tahun, agar terus berkhidmat dan memastikan Parti Pekerja (WP) mencatatkan kemenangan di GRC Aljunied, sekali gus mempertahankan kubu mereka daripada dirampas semula oleh parti pemerintah.

    “Kebanyakan penduduk di kawasan undi Kaki Bukit yang membentuk sebahagian daripada GRC Aljunied mendiami flat jenis dua, tiga dan empat bilik.

    “Umumnya, mereka warga biasa, pekerja biasa dan kami memahami isu yang dihadapi mereka, baik dari segi tekanan akibat kos kehidupan dan kos perubatan yang semakin meningkat ataupun kebanjiran pekerja asing yang membataskan peluang pekerjaan untuk rakyat. Jadi kami akan terus menyuarakan keprihatinan mereka,” ujarnya yang berusaha mengekalkan kedudukannya bagi penggal kedua.

    Kemenangan Encik Muhamad Faisal dalam pilihan raya umum 2011 turut mencatat sejarah tersendiri apabila beliau menjadi calon Melayu pertama daripada parti pembangkang yang memenangi kerusi parlimen.

    Dalam usaha mengukuhkan barisan alternatif, parti pembangkang telah menampilkan seramai 16 calon Melayu/Islam dalam pilihan raya umum kali ini, berbanding 13 dalam pilihan raya umum lalu.

    Dalam wawancara itu, Encik Muhamad Faisal turut menekankan pentingnya masyarakat Melayu memberi sokongan kepada barisan alternatif Melayu kerana ia dapat mengukuhkan lagi kesejahteraan masyarakat.

    WP sendiri menampilkan tiga karyawan Melayu berkelulusan sarjana – Encik Mohamed Fairoz Shariff, 36 tahun, mantan pegawai Lembaga Perpustakaan Negara; Encik Redzwan Hafidz Abdul Razak, 30 tahun, jurutera; dan Encik Firuz Khan, 48 tahun, pengusaha coklat, ChocolateXcellence, yang berpangkalan di Wales, Britain.

    “Kita perlu saling bantu-membantu dan lengkap-melengkapi. Dalam era sekarang, kita tidak boleh mempunyai hanya seseorang atau sesebuah pertubuhan sahaja yang boleh berdiri secara sendiri bagi mencapai satu kebaikan.

    “Saya rasa, dasarnya ialah nilai untuk bekerjasama, agar saling lengkap-melengkapi, itu sangat diperlukan terutamanya dalam masa sekarang.

    “Kalau kita tengok, maaf kata, selama 50 tahun ini, PAP telah menerajui masyarakat Melayu/Islam Singapura kita tetapi jika kita tengok pada ‘Suara Musyawarah’, di mana ia satu koleksi suara masyarakat Melayu/Islam, menunjukkan lebih banyak lagi yang perlu dilakukan masyarakat,” katanya.

    “Sejak lima dekad lalu, PAP masih belum dapat (memenuhi) apa yang diinginkan masyarakat.

    “Jadi saya rasa, sudah tiba masanya agar diadakan satu barisan alternatif bagi melengkapi apa yang telah kita ada sekarang,” ujar wakil rakyat itu sebagai mengakhiri perbualan.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Foreign Worker Issue Is Beyond Economics And Politics

    Foreign Worker Issue Is Beyond Economics And Politics

    Many of my Brothers (compatriots) feel the stress of foreign workers in Singapore.

    When we discussed this issue at a deeper level, I realize its goes beyond economics and politics.

    Its about jobs and emotions.

    Its also dilemmatic.

    Their beef isnt towards Work Permit holders but S-pass and EP holders.

    S-Pass come here with a minimum wage, thereby making them cheaper to employ, very good indeed for SMEs.

    Our government deserves credit for imposing quotas. SMEs and MNCs alike must now employ x number of citizens first before they could bring foreigners here.

    And indeed, our government has visibly reduce their numbers , especially after 2011 GE.

    At an emotional, we see a few of S-Pass holders displaying uncivil acts and forming social clusters.

    FEW PRC Chinese blast their lungs in the public transports , Few Hindu Indians try to bring the cast system and Hindi language over and FEW Filipinos do not mix with people other than their own kind.

    Yet Singaporeans like me cannot afford to see them go. Why? Who else would remain to rent our HDB flats. And mind you, rental income is one way to offload kids’ burden of providing for his/her aging parents.

    EP holders come and reside in uptown. Their men, mostly whites, come and attract both local and foreign women. Just look at any Match-making sites and see how many Japanese ladies here are seeking White men. And black and white women rarely depends on local Singaporean male to hit on them.

    It is a stereotypical view that many Asian men hardly hit on any women , a phenomenon i cannot understand and have never experienced. Yes, I do hit on Black and White women boldly. If you a Black or White female, drop me a PM.

    Singaporean men feels the pressure of trying to start a family. And when they see all these unfolding their very eyes, they feel disgruntled , which escalates to xenophobic mindsets.

    We need to address this at an emotional level, no doubt.

     

    Source: Faisal Maricar

  • Syed Danial: Damanhuri Abas Has The Moral Courage To Be Upfront On Issues Affecting The Malay-Muslim Community

    Syed Danial: Damanhuri Abas Has The Moral Courage To Be Upfront On Issues Affecting The Malay-Muslim Community

    The GRC concept has attained its goal of ensuring minority representation in parliament. In the sense there are roughly a proportionate representation of the SG population in parliament that belongs to the minority races.

    But that’s where it ends.

    For decades now, we see the phenomenon of minority candidates riding on the coattails of ministers n getting into parliament. Oftentimes not even having to go through the baptism of fire of the hustings during election, as they are part of uncontested wards.

    Before election, they promise the world. They will fight for this n that rights. They will champion our causes. They will be our voices in parliament.

    And when they finally get there, you see a completely different reality. They do not fight for our rights. When we start pushing for them, eg the hijab, we get the tiring response of they are doing ‘all they can’ behind closed doors. The community needs to be patient. There are other interests at stake.’ The good ol song and dance.

    They have become effectively the MPs that champions rights. But not our rights. They serve with distinction. For the Prime Minister. And their party.

    To an extent they no longer fulfill the functional role that they’ve been elected to do. They r there not to fight for our rights. They are there to explain govt policies to the community. Essentially they r there as the govt’s representatives to the people. Not our representatives to fight for our causes.

    And it’s not just the backbencher MPs. The greatest fulfiller of this role is the Minister in Charge of Muslim affairs. Dr Yaacob has consistently shown when push comes to shove, he takes the position of the govt.

    Not the community.

    He should be renamed Minister in Charge of Explaining Government Policies to Muslims.

    And then there’s the second Malay full Minister. Mr Masagos has also shown consistently he’s there to do the bidding of the govt. So he was used to make policy pronouncements that are beneficial to the govt. But are against the wishes of the community. Case in point joining the coalition to bomb Iraq and Syria. The community is against Islamic State. But there’s a HUGE difference between being against IS and being part of a coalition that bombs more Muslim countries. A vast majority in the MMC is against joining. Yet Minister Masagos toes the govt line. He explains govt polices, rather than champion our causes.

    I could go on n on. But I think the point is made.

    Our minority MPs represent the govt and their party.

    Not us.

    Then comes bro Damanhuri.

    He has come across as a candidate who has the moral courage to speak his mind on issues close to the hearts of Malay Muslims in SG. His rhetoric captures our imagination. Beyond just speeches, he has an excellent trek record of service to the community.

    So he comes across as genuine.

    The real deal.

    And he has redefined for us the role of minority representation in a GRC. The minority MP is there to voice the concerns and interests of the community. To champion our causes to the govt. And he hits the hammer on the head when he says we need to put such people in parliament. Else, we can shout till we’re hoarse outsider parliament. It will just be ignored. Worse still, token statements of
    Reassurances given that they would ‘work behind close doors’ to solve the issues.

    It is my fervent desire bro Daman gets elected. And I hope residents of MarsilingYT rise to the occasion.

    In the longer term, I think Pandora’s box has been opened. I call it the ‘Damanhari effect’.

    Henceforth, that will be the prototype of the archetypical minority MP.

    One with outstanding credentials of service to the community. Not Juz hi academic ability but completely out of touch with the community. We have such people in parliament now.

    Beyond a trek record of service, the moral courage to fight for our rights.

    To be our champions in parliament.

    Not there to merely explain policies to us

    ‪#‎yourDamanhuri‬

     

    Source: Syed Danial

  • Are You A Sandwich-Class Singaporean?

    Are You A Sandwich-Class Singaporean?

    Heard of the term sandwich class? The ‘sandwich class’ is an informal term coined to describe those in Singapore who live comfortably (not poor) but are ineligible to purchase HDB housing, and unable to afford private housing as well.

    In short, it describes people in the middle income class, mostly those who occupy the 30th to 70th percentile income group in Singapore.

    Due to rising costs of living, this group increasingly needs support, not just in terms of housing, but in other areas as well. For instance, those who are in the ‘sandwich generation’ also face the problem of dependency from their aging parents as well as young children.

    Luckily, the government recognises this problem and has introduced various measures to help the sandwich class, especially since this year’s National Day Rally.

    If you belong to this group of people, GET.com lists some measures and suggestions that can help you optimise the help rendered by the government:

    1. Buying Your Own Home

    One of the key measures to allow the sandwich class better access to public housing was the increase of the income ceiling limit. The household income ceiling, which currently stands at $10,000 for new HDB flats has been increased to $12,000.

    A similar increase was seen for executive condominiums (EC) as well, with the new income ceiling now at $14,000. The policy changes are specifically targeted to help the sandwich class since a household income of less than $10,000 doesn’t quite qualify as a working class income.

    The Special Housing Grant (SHG) has also been made easier to qualify. Previously, the SHG was only available to households with earning under $6,500, but has now been extended to those who earn under $8,500 per month.

    According to Department of Statistics in Singapore, our median household income last year was at $8,292, which means that most people will qualify for the SHG.

    2. Help For Childcare Expenses

    Other than tackling the problem of home ownership, a big problem Singapore faces is the low fertility rate.

    As it stands, we have been producing under replacement rate since 1977.

    To help parents defray the costs of raising children, the government has introduced the now infamous Baby Bonus Scheme and the Child Development Account (CDA) which matches savings by the government.

    In the latest update, the Baby Bonus has been increased again – an extra $2,000 for each child, and an extension of baby bonus for fifth child and beyond.

    This means that the first and second child will now get an $8,000 cash gift, while subsequent babies get $10,000 each. Parents can use these money to pay for your children’s education and medical costs.

    It was also announced during the 2015 National Day Rally that there will be an increase in Medisave grant for newborns, so there’s help for the increased premiums for the upcoming Medishield Life.

    Other than these measures, Singaporeans can definitely help themselves by ensuring that they plan for their future with careful financial planning.

    These include having enough savings, managing their household debts and also ensuring they are adequately covered by health insurance.

     

    Source: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com

  • #GE2015 Day 7 Diary: The Rise Of Chee Soon Juan

    #GE2015 Day 7 Diary: The Rise Of Chee Soon Juan

    He was once described as a “near psychopath”, but is now received at political rallies like a rockstar. The Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) rallies are now drawing larger crowds; ever since his first rally speech in 15 years was shared around on social media, people have been turning up just to hear Dr Chee Soon Juan speak.

    It’s been a sea change to behold – the man who once shuttled in and out of prison, who was bankrupted, demonised and totally written off as unelectable, is now the biggest draw at rallies every night, and even at a lunchtime rally on Monday afternoon. His speeches have been described as rational, emotive and passionate. Coming back to the rally stage after 15 long years of being barred from three general elections, no one can say that he hasn’t shown grit and determination.

    “If I leave, there will be one less voice against the government,” he said at one rally. “If PAP wins, the people will lose. …I was born Singaporean. I was raised Singaporean. And I will die Singaporean.”

    People might not agree with everything he says, or even approve of all of the SDP’s policies in their current form, but Chee has nevertheless made an impact on rallygoers and even beyond, as recordings of his speeches pass from one Facebook timeline to another. Twitter has reported that he was the second most mentioned politician in the first week of the election campaign, behind the incumbent Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Every night after the rally he autographs books and takes photos with admiring Singaporeans – volunteers of The Online Citizen reported that it took him one-and-a-half hours on Monday night to complete his book-signing session.

    His calm demeanour and impassioned speeches are also being compared favourably to the performance of his opponents, who have occasionally resorted to fear mongering and personal attacks.

    Vivian Balakrishnan, the leading People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate for the four-member Holland-Bukit Timah team, claimed that the SDP’s policies would put Singapore on the “road to Greece” by increasing social spending without being up front about how the money would be raised.

    But at least that criticism was engaging in some way with policy; many of the other comments made by Balakrishnan and running mate Sim Ann simply veered into character assassination.

    “The impression that this Dr Chee gives me is that they are very good at ‘chut pattern’ [putting up a show or pretence],” said Sim Ann in a Mandarin speech on Monday evening that was described as having “dripped sarcasm”. “I feel that in the whole of Singapore, if Dr Chee claims to be second-best in “chut pattern”, no one would dare claim to be number one.”

    At the SDP’s lunchtime rally in UOB Plaza on Monday, Chee played to the demographic by focusing on the lack of accountability for poor investment choices made by Singapore’s sovereign wealth funds.

    “The Government accuses us (SDP) of coming up with policies of tax and spend, but what they will do is take our reserves and make failed investments,” he said, pointing out large amounts that had been plowed into companies like the debt-ridden Olam International and Thai conglomerate Shin Corp, as well as banks like Citigroup, Merill Lynch and Barclays during the 2008 financial crisis.

    Standing directly under towering bank building in the heart of Singapore’s financial centre, Chee called out wealth inequality and described the widening income gap as a problem that “harms the common good, erodes cohesiveness, and corrodes the values that fosters social cohesiveness”.

    “Priorities!” he declared, echoing his party’s message of adjusting state expenditure to focus more on social goods such as healthcare and education to cheers and applause from the crowd.

    It is unclear how many of those who gathered in UOB Plaza on Monday afternoon were persuaded by the SDP’s arguments, or how many of them would actually be voting in areas contested by the party. While Chee expressed the belief that even the well-to-do in the Holland-Bukit Timah constituency – where he is contesting – care about redistributive policie and social justice, the fact remains that the SDP only polled 39.9 per cent in the last election, meaning that they now have to convince about 16,000 people to vote differently from before. It’s a daunting challenge with no guarantees.

    Chee Soon Juan

    But win or lose in Holland-Bukit Timah – or any of the other constituencies in which the SDP is contesting – one victory has already been won: after years of being slammed, criticised and demonised in public and the mainstream media, Chee has succeeded in rehabilitating his image, and cannot be described as an unelectable “psychopath” any more.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

deneme bonusu