Category: Singapuraku

  • 2 Anak Melayu Cemerlang Lanjut Pelajaran Di Oxford, Harvard

    2 Anak Melayu Cemerlang Lanjut Pelajaran Di Oxford, Harvard

    KERJAYA dua penyelidik setempat ini dalam bidang akademik dan penyelidikan mendapat suntikan dengan biasiswa yang menyokong mereka mengikuti program di universiti terulung dunia.

    Cik Nurul Amilllin Hussain, 26 tahun, akan memburu ijazah Doktor Falsafah (PhD) dalam bidang geografi di Universiti Oxford.

    Beliau mengkaji kemampanan dan cara orang ramai menggunakan sistem tenaga suria.

    Dr Izzuddin Aris, 31 tahun, pula akan ke Universiti Harvard bagi program poskedoktoran dalam bidang perubatan.

    Beliau pula mengkaji asal usul penyakit, termasuk faktor risiko di peringkat awal kehidupan – daripada sebelum kehamilan ibu hingga selepas kelahiran – yang boleh membawa kepada penyakit kronik dalam kanak-kanak dan kemudian sebagai dewasa.

    Mereka merupakan antara 38 penerima Skim Bakat Pengajaran dan Penyelidikan Akademik (Start) Kementerian Pendidikan (MOE) yang menyokong warga Singapura yang ingin memburu kerjaya di universiti berautonomi setempat dan bertujuan membantu universiti itu membangun bakat akademik mereka.

     

    Source: www.beritaharian.sg

     

     

  • Osman Sulaiman: Dilemma Of A Malay Voter On Reserved Presidential Election

    Osman Sulaiman: Dilemma Of A Malay Voter On Reserved Presidential Election

    Dilemma of a Malay voter this coming reserved Presidential Election (PE)

    What participation means for the Malay voters.

    1. Reserving the PE only for Malay candidates is against the grain of meritocracy. The central tenets that our country is built on.

    2. Participation would mean condoning and prolonging race based policies that further divide our nation.

    3. Allowing ourselves to be used as a political pawn for self-serving purposes.

    4. We perpetuate the perverse narrative by the gov that Malay community cannot win an open election without assistance

    5. The community descend to a less dignified level as we become part of a flawed system.

    Even if the above dont prick us, there is the issue of who do we vote for? At present, these 3 hopefuls.

    1. Halimah Yaacob
    2. Salleh Marican
    3. Farid Khan

    We know that the president’s role is largely ceremonial. With the new changes to our Elected Presidency System, our president’s discretionary powers are further abridged. And who gets to be president, would not matter as much before.

    I’ve seem some who has indicated that they would probably spoil their votes.

    What non-participation or spoiling the vote would mean for the voters.

    1. If Mdm Halimah contest, she would most probably win the election. History has shown that when the ruling party endorses a candidate, that someone would go on to win the election.

    Spoiling the vote would most definitely hand Mdm Halimah the coveted spot. I dont think this will be ideal as we would want someone who isnt too closely related to the ruling party.

    2. If we abstain and not turn up to vote, we are excluding ourselves from nation building and at the same time democracy.

    3. Part of democracy is to show our voice through our votes no matter even if we are in the minority. Not participating would mean the result would not reflect the true sentiments of the people.

    So do we participate, or no? It’s a tough call.

     

    Source: Khan Osman Sulaiman

     

  • Ex-Convict On Tagging Program: SMRT Patrol Officers, Please Don’t Judge Book By Cover

    Ex-Convict On Tagging Program: SMRT Patrol Officers, Please Don’t Judge Book By Cover

    wah lao, don’t judge a book by its cover can or not!? like this don’t need Yellow Ribbon Project Singapore liao loh jibais. if really want screen, at least find a corner not in the middle of the station lah, he also didn’t committed any offences that need to be screen in the middle of the station tio boh!? bodoh siol !

    SMRT PATROL OFFICERS!!!
    Please get this into your head. Tattoed people and Tagged people are not a threat to your Country. Please wake up. What’s becoming of Singapore and its measures to ensure a safe country for all to live in? You are bloody wasting your time checking on common people like us whilst letting the true suspects slip out of your sight. Stop thinking straight. Cause it aint gonna get you any close to keeping the country safe. Criminals would be thinking out of the box while you are still stuck in that box.

    This is what happened to me. I am en ex-convict and just got out of prison after serving a 2 year term. Currently, I am on a tagging Programme with the Singapore Prisons and have a watch-like device on my ankle(as seen in picture 1) which is used to track my whereabouts and ensure I comply with my curfew. This happened at Eunos MRT Station at about 1140am yesterday. I was on my way to meet someone who is involved in my Prison Programme. I was late and thus was in a rush. I had to use the washroom before taking the Train for a 45 minutes journey. Before I went to the washroom, I noticed the SMRT Patrol Officers screening someone. When I was done and made my way to tap in to the platform, I was stopped by these officers.

    They felt I looked suspicious and said that they want me to come aside with them cause they need to talk me for a while. I showed them my tagging and told them I need to rush but they said it was just for a while and a fast one.

    I was angry when they were insistent after I spoke of my tagging. As we walked, I asked them what they wanted. They asked me for my particulars. I asked them what was it for. They said for screening. I told them it was very irritating for me to see them to treat me like that. Yet, I took out my ID, gave it to them and just told them it was ridiculous to screen despite me showing I have tagging. They looked at me as I paced up and down. Then, the officer handed me my ID and told me thank you. Right after that, another Malay officer sarcastically said, “Thank you so much.” I was unhappy about his absurd behaviour and stopped to ask for his particulars. While asking, I attempted to take a picture of him. But he did not allow me and covered my mobile’s camera lens (as seen in picture 2).

    He asked me to just write down the details. I told him I have no pen. He passed me a pen and paper and spelt out his Name as I was writing with reference to his name tag. The Name of the officer is Sergeant Habib Noor. He said he was the in charge of that Team and I was taken aback. An IC of the Team and he had this kind of attitude. He set a bad example for his Team and this was projected clearly from the way they spoke to me. I returned the pen and he said “Thank you” again sarcastically. Another officer repeated the same. I was totally astonished by the way they treat people like us and was dumbfounded. This is being disrespectful and biase. I said nothing more and made a move.

    In the name of doing their job, they are just picking on first look suspects just by our appearance and not even cause we have a suspicous body language. Their way of concluding one to be a suspect is unreasonable. And the way they treat us is totally unacceptable. They deemed me as suspicious and decided that I am capable of being a threat to the commuters only because I had a tag on my ankle. Cause it clearly shows I am an ex-convict. Is that what our Country has taught us? Where is the togetherness and equality they kept repeating to us when we were in school? What happened to all those bragging about 2nd chance to ex-offenders? So it was only for publicity but not put to real act isn’t it? As long as I am an ex-offender, I shall be deemed a suspect. As I am capable of committing a crime yet again. Moreover I am a threat to my own people. So I have to accept it. And this is gonna haunt me all my life? I don’t understand.

    I used to feel ashamed to walk around with this. And even avoided travelling in Public Transports. However, I became used to it after my fellow Colleagues and my Employer paid no mind to my tagging and accepted me for the way I am at the present moment. Even strangers like Cabbies and UBER drivers strike a conversation when they see me with this tagging and make me feel comfortable as well as complete the trip with the best route to ensure I reach home on time. Recently, I have been taking the Public transport frequently and feel so good that I am once again a part of this community. However, it did not turn out as comfortable. I hope that my sharing can help improve the way People like us are seen as well as treated in this society. We wanna reform and be a part of you. Please do not put us down cause of our past. We are trying to forget it and start anew. Do not remind us our past. Not everyone commits a crime with the desire to live in shame afterwards. Many People do not understand this. And to my disappointment, People from the enforcement.

    Reader’s contribution.

     

    Source: SG Kay Poh

  • Netizens Exposed Identity Of Man Who Robbed Taxi Uncle

    Netizens Exposed Identity Of Man Who Robbed Taxi Uncle

    Dear Editors,

    This young man who is not disabled stole from a taxi driver during his trip and used the money he stole to pay the driver. If you have no money, don’t take taxi, don’t do such scumbag acts.

    After netizens CSI his identity, this Faidil deactivated his Facebook. Let’s see if you can run away from the police.

    Here are his details: The alleged taxi thief’s facebook profile is Faidil Didil and his real name is Muhammad Faidil Bin Samri

    Here is his picture.

     

    Hope the police take action against him. Shameless to steal from a hardworking taxi uncle.

     

    Yasser

    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Transcom NSF Officer Pointed And Pulled Trigger Of Revolver On Teammate, Then Lied And Tried To Cover Up

    Transcom NSF Officer Pointed And Pulled Trigger Of Revolver On Teammate, Then Lied And Tried To Cover Up

    A police full-time national serviceman who pointed an empty revolver at another NSF, pulled the trigger and later lied about it was sentenced to two months’ jail on Wednesday (Aug 2).

    Justin Degoulange-Chua, 21, was the group leader of a patrol team attached to the Public Transport Security Command (Transcom).

    On March 5 last year (2016), in the police room at Bugis MRT station, Degoulange-Chua pointed the pistol at patrol officer Muhammad Syukri Rahiman, 21. He was charged with using threatening behaviour with intent to cause alarm to Mr Syukri.

    Degoulange-Chua also admitted to giving false information to a public servant on May 5 the same year, when he said he did not point the firearm at anyone but had taken it out to check it.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Ho Lian-Yi said Degoulange-Chua was leading the team – made up of the victim and three others – on the first day of foot patrols. It was the first day of duty for the victim and another NSF police officer on the team, and they had just completed the basic Transcom course.

    While taking a break, Degoulange-Chua talked about the team’s culture, which required rookies to perform push-ups and jumping jacks, among other things.

    He then ordered the victim to get into a push-up position.

    When the victim was on all fours, DPP Ho said the accused took out the victim’s extendable T-baton from the holster.

    He extended the T-baton, placed it on the victim’s back, and told him to continue doing push-ups.

    The victim managed to do one before the T-baton fell on the floor. The accused then told the victim to get up.

    The entire incident was recorded by a assistant group leader on his mobile phone, who later shared it via the online social media app Snapchat.

    When the victim was sitting at a table, the accused unbuckled his right holster, drew his Taurus revolver and took out all the five live rounds. He then placed four live rounds on the table and held one in his left hand.

    After closing the chamber of the revolver, he asked the victim how many bullets were on the table. The victim replied that there were four.

    The accused then said there was one round in the revolver. He pointed the weapon at the victim and squeezed the trigger at least once.

    DPP Ho said: “The victim jumped out of his seat in alarm and shouted for the accused to stop. The victim was afraid that he would be hurt or even killed if the revolver was, in fact, loaded.”

    Investigations showed that on May 5, the accused, in a statement to a Transcom Base officer, lied that he did not point his revolver at anyone.

    Degoulange-Chua came clean about what he did only about three months later.

    None of the four men brought up the incident in their initial statements to the police. The accused had approached three of them, including the victim, to cover up the incident.

    Defence lawyer S. Balamurugan said his client, who is now a student, has apologised to the victim. He said his client’s offences were “completely out of character”, and the incident has caused his client great anxiety.

    The maximum penalty for giving false information to a public servant is six months’ jail and a $1,000 fine. For using threatening behaviour with intent to cause alarm, it is a $5,000 fine and six months’ jail.

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu