Blog

  • Man Commemorates SG50 By Having Sex With 50 Singapore Girls

    Man Commemorates SG50 By Having Sex With 50 Singapore Girls

    I saw this funny picture circulating online and it definitely needs to be shared! Now is fashion to be #SG50, everything also #SG50 but nobody can win this crazy guy lah!

    He intends to celebrate and commemorate SG50 by f**king 50 girls this year. With a face like his, I wonder how he get all his lobang or is he very rich to spend money on FL?

    Funny things people do just to suck up to the government’s SG50 celebrations.. end up overdo it and make it feel fake and gross. Wish him all the best no STD.

    Jia Wens

    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Abusive Gay Man Hid Sexuality From Wife, Denied Custody Of Triplets

    Abusive Gay Man Hid Sexuality From Wife, Denied Custody Of Triplets

    A man who hid his homosexuality from his wife for 13 years has been denied joint custody of their triplets, not because he is gay or HIV-positive, but because of his “appallingly poor decision-making ability”, a judge has said.

    The 49-year-old wife has been awarded sole custody, in a rare legal move which is justified only in exceptional circumstances which show that joint custody is not in a child’s best interests.

    Neither party can be named in the case, in which the businesswoman obtained an interim divorce in 2011 based on unreasonable conduct – ending a 15-year marriage. At issue before the court was the care, control and custody of the children as well as the division of matrimonial assets.

    Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy said in judgment grounds released yesterday: “The husband is in the same position as any parent, whatever the gender or sexual orientation, who has displayed… appallingly poor decision-making ability.”

    The couple’s triplets were conceived through in-vitro fertilisation, which the judge noted exacted a high toll on the mother emotionally, physically and psychologically.

    The wife found out about her husband’s double life only in 2009, after she hired a private detective.

    “I am unimpressed by the husband’s capacity for truth-telling,” said Justice Vinodh.

    In 2012, the man had posted a picture of himself wearing only underwear on a website called Manjam, on which he sought other men for short-term trysts.

    He also described himself there as a childless 35-year-old when he was, in fact, 10 years older and the father of triplets. He also lied by saying he was HIV negative.

    The judge cited his tryst with a gay partner who led a ” particularly reckless and dissolute lifestyle”. The drug-taking partner had in 2009 been found unconscious and naked under the bed of another homosexual lover, who lay naked and dead in bed. A coroner’s inquiry found he died of brain damage due to drug intoxication.

    The husband was convicted of drug possession and consumption and jailed for six months in 2013, He was declared bankrupt in 2012.

    He had also assaulted his wife, leading her to take out to a Personal Protection Order in 2010.

    The judge said all these factors showed “an ability to make decisions which are positively detrimental to his own welfare”, as well as his kids’ long-term interests.

    He ruled that the husband was to have no more than two hours a week of supervised access, plus telephone access – limits which were already in place.

    The husband defended himself while the wife was represented by lawyer Tang Gee Ni.

    Overall, the judge awarded a 60:40 division of the matrimonial assets in favour of the wife out of a joint pool of $2.65 million. This was based on the direct and indirect contributions of both parties to the family and factored in the father’s $327,529 lump sum maintenance for the children.

    As the husband was a bankrupt, the court had no powers to touch his assets vested under the Official Assignee’s control.

    Justice Vinodh ordered that he settle the $123,391 debt to discharge the bankruptcy with the 40 per cent sum he is entitled to from the sale of the couple’s Sembawang property in 2011. This was a condition precedent to effect a “just and equitable” division of the matrimonial assets, he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Gas Tariff To Increase In August

    Gas Tariff To Increase In August

    The gas tariff for households will increase to 18.25 cents per kWh from August, City Gas announced on Wednesday (Jul 29).

    The increase of 0.63 cents per kWh for the period of August to October is due to a 12.7 per cent rise in fuel costs compared to the previous quarter, said City Gas.

    City Gas said it reviews the gas tariffs based on guidelines set by the gas industry regulator, the Energy Market Authority (EMA). The revised gas tariffs, which have been approved by EMA, as follows:

    (Table: City Gas)

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Salt Deposits Cause MRT Breakdowns

    Salt Deposits Cause MRT Breakdowns

    Salt, water and electricity do not mix. Commuters in Singapore found out the hard way on July 7, when an accumulation of salty deposits on an electrical component on the East-West Line triggered the biggest rail breakdown here.

    Releasing their findings three weeks after the incident yesterday, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) and rail operator SMRT said laboratory tests found that the deposits were caused by a persistent leak near the Tanjong Pagar station tunnel, towards Raffles Place.

    The deposits were 15 times saltier than seawater.

    Water from the leak itself was found to be one-sixth the saltiness of seawater – an indication that the deposits had taken some time to precipitate.

    The deposits allowed electricity from the MRT’s power-supplying third rail to stray across its insulator into the ground. This caused several electrical trips along the East-West Line as well as the connected North-South Line.

    Tripping cuts off electricity supply to prevent a stray current from electrocuting train occupants.

    The findings were arrived at with the help of external experts from Parsons Brinckerhoff and Meidensha, whose services were paid for by LTA. They coincide with a hypothesis by George Yu, a chartered engineer specialising in industrial forensics, failure analysis and accident investigation.

    Dr Yu, who has done extensive work on the MRT, told The Straits Times just days after the July 7 breakdown that deposits on insulators were the prime suspect.

    He said contaminants would settle on the third-rail insulators over time. These include water, and graphite from the trains’ current collector shoes, which make contact with the rail. Graphite is a conductor of electricity.

    To prevent a repeat of the incident, Dr Yu said SMRT should “prevent insulators from contacting water or liquid”. He also suggested that insulators be regularly cleaned to prevent deposit build-up and that old insulators with heavy deposits in areas exposed to tunnel water leakage be immediately replaced.

    SMRT said that this was done right after the incident. The operator and LTA said yesterday that some 30,000 insulators on both lines will be replaced by the first quarter of 2017 – along with the planned third-rail-replacement programme.

    SMRT also said it would improve maintenance of the insulators. Chief executive Desmond Kuek said: “We’ve reviewed all our existing work instructions and we’re satisfied that they’ve all been complied with. But…we will be taking firm steps to review and improve all those work instructions.”

    SMRT will also “desensitise” the circuit breakers that trip the system, by raising the stray voltage limit from 136 volts to 200 volts by end of this week. LTA said this was in accordance with international standards and was completely safe.

    In the longer term, it will implement voltage limiting devices which are being tested in Downtown Line 1. These will isolate power trips.

    LTA added that it was also studying the feasibility of separating the North-South and East-West lines, so that a power incident does not spread across both lines.

    It said this would be considered carefully, so as to ensure that doing so would not cause other weaknesses.

    LTA chief executive Chew Mun Leong added that “we will leave no stone unturned” to improve the reliability of the system.

     

    Source: http://transport.asiaone.com

  • NTUC FoodFare To Review Price Caps At Hawker Centres After Criticism

    NTUC FoodFare To Review Price Caps At Hawker Centres After Criticism

    Following sharp criticism from hawkers on the price caps to be imposed at its new Bukit Panjang hawker centre, NTUC Foodfare said today (July 29) that these limits – which were intended to keep basic meals affordable – would be reviewed from time to time if necessary, to take into account the cost of ingredients and inflation. Stallholders can also submit requests to adjust the price ceilings, it added.

    Foodfare was appointed by the National Environment Agency (NEA) to operate the Bukit Panjang hawker centre, which is the second of 20 new hawker centres to be managed by social enterprises and cooperatives.

    Tender documents for the hawker centre, which is slated to open by the end of this year, state that each stall should offer at least two items that are capped at certain prices. The price of dishes such as fishball noodle, nasi lemak and chicken rice are capped at between S$2.50 and S$2.70. The price ceilings for Western food are higher, such as S$5.80 for pasta.

    Responding to TODAY’s queries, Foodfare said: “These caps are not to be held indefinitely and reviews would certainly be made should raw materials price increase or other cost pressures make it necessary for the adjustments.”

    It reiterated the rationale for the price caps, saying that it “wants a public hawker centre to have affordable food for everyone”. Interested hawkers would have to submit, in their bids, the amount of rent they can pay – this will make up 40 per cent of the assessment criteria. The remaining 60 per cent involves “(food) pricing, food variety and concept, experience and taste”, Foodfare said.

    In 2012, the Hawker Centre Public Consultation Panel proposed having social enterprises manage new hawker centres, and having the operator setting aside stalls for the lower income and special needs persons to set up low cost businesses. Hawker centres are currently managed and run by the NEA.

    The first of 20 new hawker centres will open at Ci Yuan Community Club in Hougang Avenue 9 next Thursday. It will also be managed on a not-for-profit basis by Fei Siong Food Management. Stall holders at this hawker centre are required to offer at least two products that are priced at S$2.80 or lower. A Fei Siong spokesperson said all stallholders will pay a total of S$2,200 each month, including rental.

    The hawkers are required to operate their stalls for 12 hours a day and “work with the management to ensure their off days do not disrupt the business operations and dining experience”, the spokesperson said. “The stallholders’ commitment is a key fundamental to the success of their operations and the hawker centre,” she added.

    HAWKERS UNHAPPY WITH NEW MODEL

    The new hawker centre management model came under the spotlight this week after Minister of Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan responded to a Facebook post by Mr Douglas Ng, a hawker who attended a tender briefing by Foodfare.

    Mr Ng, who runs a stall at Golden Mile hawker centre, spoke out against the price caps. “Do you actually think that a quality hawker will come out with quality food when they use quality ingredients and if the cost of food is so high…If the basic ingredients are so expensive, how can we expect hawkers to make a living?” he said. Responding to Mr Ng on Monday, Mr Balakrishnan reiterated the steps that his ministry has taken to reduce rental costs for hawkers. He added that he had “made it clear to Foodfare that they are not to charge high rents”.

    Speaking to TODAY, Mr Ng, 24, said there is a lack of transparency in how the price ceilings are derived. “Why is it that Western food can be sold at double the price of fishball noodles? It makes all of us want to sell pasta instead…then how do we preserve hawker heritage?”

    Makansutra founder and food writer KF Seetoh also took issue with the price caps and the lack of a guideline on rental bids. “When top restaurants raise prices for the rich, not many really cares, but when the hawkers do, the loud and richer ones make noise and cry foul… Please don’t politicise our hawker food and don’t kill our hawker culture,” he said.

    Other hawkers also raised concerns such as the required operating hours and higher overhead costs at these new hawker centres.

    Ms Li Ruifang, 31, who owns 545 Whampoa Prawn Noodles at Tekka Centre, had failed with her bid to run a stall at the hawker centre at Ci Yuan Community Club. She said: “Although we only open for business seven to nine hours a day, we spend another five hours preparing food and washing the stall. I will have to double my manpower or increase my own (working) hours just to make this ruling, and that will increase costs.”

    Mr Melvin Chew, who runs Jin Ji Teochew Braised Duck & Kway Chap at Chinatown Food Complex, added: “Hawkers at the new food centres have to pay plate collection and dishwashing fees, use common utensils and uniforms. They are run like food courts, not hawker centres.”

    An NEA spokesperson said that while the respective managing enterprises have the prerogative to decide on the price caps, it will monitor the implementation of the new management model and the concerns that may be raised by hawkers.

    It added that it is open to the idea – which has been suggested by some hawkers – of concession passes for seniors and low-income individuals, in place of price caps, should the operators decide to take it up.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu