Blog

  • Budget 2017: Price Hikes Affect Poor More Than Rich

    Budget 2017: Price Hikes Affect Poor More Than Rich

    Water is a vital resource and a basic human right. Yet, the Government of Singapore sees it fit to use utilitarian or volume based pricing model for the provision of water.

    Such a model affects both the rich and poor and some say, the poor are more adversely affected than the rich.

    A 30% price hike will be a stretch for the poorer families while the rich has the means the ride the price hike.

    If it was the intention of the government to elicit any kind if behavioural change in the consumption of water, we’ll probably see the poor conserve a lot more.

    One spokesperson from IPS said that the 30% price hike is to create awareness. It’s a poor choice of words even for a PAP apologist on the IPS payroll. What’s he smoking?

    Call a spade a spade a price hike is not a water conservation campaign or an awareness programme.

    In an article written by Leong Hze Hian, he said that the water price in Hong Kong is priced 14 times lower. Perhaps they have better technology but whatever the reasons are, it’s definitely merits a discussion in parliament.

    The budget seems to benefit the middle class more than the underclass. The 20% tax relief capped at S$500 benefits the middle class for sure.

    Perhaps a tax on manual car wash and a closer watch on how water is used is F&B outlets when dishes are washed is much needed.

    With the advancement in smart metering technologies, it is possible to have different pricing structures for industrial versus residential users by districts, flat-types and household income.

    A different pricing structure definitely adds complexity to the pricing regime but it will definitely have the intended effect of changes in consumption patterns.

     

    Source: www.theindependent.sg

  • Hijab: A Personal Choice

    Hijab: A Personal Choice

    Hijab might have been rarely seen on the streets 20 years ago, but it increasingly gained popularity, especially with the start of the Reform Era in 1998. Today, various types of Islamic headscarves have become common sights on the streets. The rising popularity of hijab has also influenced the development of the fashion industry, as seen in the rising number of hijab retailers and Muslim fashion designers.

    Women’s rights activist Neng Dara Affiah said she had worn hijab since she was young. She said it made her feel more confident.

    “In the town I grew up we wore hijab because it was tradition and also for our religion,” said the former commissioner with the National Commission on Violence Against Women (Komnas Perempuan).

    Devi Asmarani, editor of Magdalene magazine, gave her view on the trend of wearing hijab.

    “When I was growing up, not many women were wearing hijab. I remember at school one girl suddenly started wearing a hijab to school and we were shocked,” she said.

    She said the scene had been changing so much in the last 10 to 15 years.

    “I think Indonesian people aren’t the most critical people, because historically, the most successful parts of the Soeharto years taught us not to question things. A lot of people wear hijab and tell their children to wear it because other people are wearing it.”

    “There is a lot more peer pressure and we don’t like to be different, so we also wear hijab,” she said.

    While peer pressure to wear hijab does exist, it requires a lot of thought to pull it off. Vita Kartika Cahyarani started to wear hijab one year ago. The 20-year-old woman said she had never been extremely religious but the thought of wearing hijab kept coming to her mind until it was clear to herself that she genuinely wanted to wear hijab.

    She said the best way to describe her decision was by quoting writer RM Drake, “Some people try so hard to change but sometimes it doesn’t happen that way; we cannot force it. Sometimes it just happens overnight, like one day it all makes sense and just like that […] you change.”

    When she was finally ready to wear it, people in her surroundings were not. They began to question her decision.

    “People were shocked and asked me if it was a joke,” she said.

    “It was not easy to put on the hijab. I experienced a lot of prejudice. I don’t wear it because it is a trend. I want to be the only one who’s in control of even one single hair strand of mine.” Taking hijab off is not easy either. Arlita, 25, eventually took off her hijab after wearing it for 10 years. At first, she started to wear hijab because she wanted to hide herself; she was uncomfortable with the attention that she got and wanted to seem neutral.

    She found that wearing the hijab she never explored relationships and therefore never explored herself. “There was a saying that I heard many times ‘don’t be concerned by the men who will seduce you, but be concerned whether you seduced them,” she said.

    Arlita became very lost and decided to take off her hijab to learn about herself.

    Aulia Kushardini, 23, took her hijab off three years ago against the wishes of her family. She made the decision when she went to college and explored her identity. She started to think that wearing hijab was not a true representation of who she was.

    When she was in Europe, she experimented by taking off her hijab. She has not worn it since. This was not an easy change, especially for her family. She said her mother cried for days and people relentlessly questioned her decision.

    “People thought that I did it because I had broken up with my boyfriend and I was stressed out. There were backhanded compliments like ‘you looked prettier with the hijab on’ […] People assumed I had started to live a very liberal life and would ask me very personal sexual questions.”

    She said the biggest misunderstanding was that women who took off their hijab just wanted to look pretty.

    “It really bothers me because it has nothing to do with beauty. It took courage to do it and if it wasn’t coming from within you, you would not do it,” Aulia said.

    The decision to wear or take off hijab should be a personal one. Neng hopes women learn to accept each others’ differences.

    “I think that women in Indonesia have to be more tolerant of each other and accept others’ decisions,” she said.

    Source: TheJakartaPost

  • Commentary: I Want To Save Water For My Future Generation

    Commentary: I Want To Save Water For My Future Generation

    I’m trying to see this from a positive light. Water is scarcity in Singapore, as land is.

    We depend on Malaysia for our water and our 4 taps may not be able to support everyone in the long run. Water conservation is indeed important and the only way to make us save, instead of water rationing which can be troublesome, is to increase the price of water so that we don’t waste water.

    Have you seen how we use our water? Reflect on the amount of water you use for wudhu’. Rasulullah saw only used a bowl of water. And us? We waste it. We’re wasting A LOT of commodities these days. Just like food. If Rasulullah saw was still alive, I am very sure he would disapprove of all the wastage.

    So this move, I approve. By making us feel the pinch financially and force us to save water, I think in the long run, it will help. I definitely want to save water for my future generation.

     

    Reader’s Contribution

    Ummul Ammatullah

  • The Batter Room: Membuat Kek Dan Membantu Golongan Kurang Bernasib Baik Dan Berkeperluan Khas

    The Batter Room: Membuat Kek Dan Membantu Golongan Kurang Bernasib Baik Dan Berkeperluan Khas

    Ini bengkel membuat kek yang sangat lain daripada yang lain. Ia ‘istimewa’. Bukan saja anda belajar membuat kek, biskut atau pastri di sini. Malah anda mungkin didampingi, disertai atau dibantu oleh golongan berkeperluan khas.

    Itulah kelainan penuh bermakna yang ditawarkan The Batter Room kendalian Cik Nurhuda Mohd Nor, 36 tahun.

    The Batter Room, yang terletak di Blok 825 Tampines St 81, adalah hasil gabungan dua minat mendalam Cik Nurhuda – membuat kek dan membantu golongan kurang bernasib baik dan berkeperluan khas.

    “Walaupun ia hanya tiga bulan saja sejak Batter Room ditubuhkan, mengadakan studio yang inklusif untuk membuat kek sudah menjadi impian saya sejak usia saya 17 tahun lagi,” cerita Cik Nurhuda kepada BERITAMediacorp.

    Kini, The Batter Room sudah membimbing sekitar 30 anak remaja sekolah rendah dan menengah yang mengalami keadaan seperti autisme, sindrom Down dan ADHD.

    BELUM INKLUSIF LAGIKAH MASYARAKAT KITA?

    Cik Nurhuda mempunyai pengalaman 19 tahun dalam bidang bekerja dengan golongan sedemikian. Beliau memberitahu BERITAMediacorp bahawa golongan berkeperluan khas itu kurang diberi peluang untuk menjadi sebahagian daripada wadah konvensional.

    Beliau yang juga pernah berkhidmat lebih 10 tahun sebagai seorang guru di Sekolah MINDS, memberitahu bahawa daripada pengalaman beliau, ramai bekas pelajarnya menghadapi kesusahan untuk mendapatkan pekerjaan.

    “Ini membuat golongan berkeperluan khas terlepas banyak peluang. Hanya mereka yang dapat berdikari saja dapat diambil kerja. Saya tertanya, bagaimana dengan yang lain? Saya tidak mahu keadaan mereka semakin teruk,” luah beliau.

    Ada yang menganggap golongan tersebut sebagai sukar untuk diambil kerja dan banyak syarikat tidak mahu meluangkan masa untuk menjalankan latihan.

    BERITAMediacorp juga mendapati daripada laporan-laporan sebelum ini bahawa, dalam satu tinjauan dijalankan Yayasan Lien, hanya lima daripada 10 ibu bapa selesa anak mereka berinteraksi dengan golongan berkeperluan khas.

    JADI APAKAH PERANAN THE BATTER ROOM?

    “Saya tahu saya tidak dapat membantu semua orang tetapi sekurang-kurangnya dapatlah menghulurkan bantuan sedikit,” ujar Cik Nurhuda.

    The Batter Room sudah menjalankan beberapa bengkel untuk mereka yang berkeperluan khas dan satu bengkel inklusif di mana ia dihadiri masyarakat umum dan mereka yang berkeperluan khas.

    “Alhamdulillah semuanya berjalan dengan lancar. Mereka juga memberi respons yang memberansangkan,” kata beliau penuh semangat kepada BERITAMediacorp.

    Cik Nurhuda menyifatkan The Batter Room sebagai tempat memberi peluang untuk semua orang. Beliau memberitahu BERITAMediacorp bahawa beliau percaya golongan kurang bernasib baik dan berkeperluan khas hanya mereka yang disalahfahami.

    “Saya ingin Batter Room menjadi ruang di mana tiada masalah untuk anda meluahkan segalanya, tiada masalah untuk anda mengalami ‘breakdown/meltdown’, tiada masalah penerimaan tidak kira kaum, masalah, latar belakang ataupun gangguan yang anda mengalami,” ujar beliau.

    “KITA HIDUP SEKALI”, JADI BANTULAH SESAMA INSAN

    Apabila ditanyakan soalan mengapa Cik Nurhuda memulakan The Batter Room, beliau memberitahu ia bukan sekadar minat dan impian saja.

    Beliau menjelaskan kepada BERITAMediacorp bahawa harapan para ibu bapa yang mempunyai anak berkeperluan khas yang beliau kenali, menjadi antara faktor itu.

    Ini bertambah dengan sokongan padu yang diberi suami Cik Nurhuda. Suaminya bukan saja mendengar dan turut berbincang dengannya tetapi juga memberikan kata-kata semangat untuk beliau memulakan usaha murni ini, kata Cik Nurhuda.

    “Beliau memberitahu saya supaya jangan tunggu lagi. Teruskan. Tiada apa yang menghalang. Kami juga tidak ingin keuntungan. Kita hidup sekali. Kami harap dalam hidup ini dapat kami menyumbang dan membantu sesama insan,”ujar beliau.

    IMPIAN LEBIH BESAR – BANTU LEBIH RAMAI KUMPULAN ‘TERSEPIT’

    Akur dengan kemungkinan perniagaannya tidak memulangkan hasil yang menguntungkan, Cik Nurhuda berkata antara cabaran lain dialami The Batter Room adalah meyakinkan, mengenalkan, dan diterima masyarakat akan misi dan visi The Batter Room.

    Beliau juga menambah bahawa beliau berharap The Batter Room dapat diiktiraf sebagai perusahaan sosial bagi mendapat pendanaan dan sokongan.

    Ini kerana beliau berharap The Batter Room pada masa akan datang dapat membuka pintu kepada pelbagai lapisan masyarakat seperti mereka yang mempunyai masalah kewangan, mental dan juga para bekas banduan.

    Beliau juga berharap dapat menjadikan The Batter Room dilengkapi dengan kemudahan-kemudahan yang mesra kerusi roda.

    (Gambar-gambar: Nurhuda Mohd Nur, Facebook/ The Batter Room)

    “Saya sudah mengadakan perbincangan dengan MINDS untuk menawarkan Batter Room sebagai tempat latihan amali bagi para pelajarnya,” katanya.

    WAJAH THE BATTER ROOM YANG DIINGINKAN

    Sejujurnya, menurut Cik Nurhuda, pada jangka masa panjang beliau berharap The Batter Room dapat menggajikan golongan kurang bernasib baik dan berkeperluan khas dan menjadi pembantu semasa bengkel diadakan.

    “Saya cuma harap orang ramai dapat menerima Batter Room. Lebih daripada itu, saya harap masyarakat dapat menerima satu sama lain tanpa memikirkan kekurangan seseorang,” luah beliau.

    Semestinya, Cik Nurhuda boleh disifatkan sebagai antara usahawan yang berani. Berani untuk tidak meninggalkan di belakang, golongan ‘istimewa’ yang memerlukan sokongan masyarakat. Berani untuk tidak mengejar wang dan keuntungan semata-mata, kerana sifat kemanusiannya.

     

    Source: BeritaMediacorp

  • Osman Sulaiman: It Is Imperative That Israel Should Know The World Is Not With Them When They Violate International Law

    Osman Sulaiman: It Is Imperative That Israel Should Know The World Is Not With Them When They Violate International Law

    As the international community condemns and protests against Israel on its controversial law legalizing the building of settlements on West Bank, in Singapore, we are reduced to just handing a letter to its embassy.

    We’ve tried applying for a protest of Netanyahu’s visit to Singapore. Although we received a confirmation from NParks to proceed with our event, a day later, a police officer called me up to say that my event requires a police permit.

    We were told that such permits would take 2 weeks to process. This effectively disqualifies our event from taking place as we had applied to hold the event less than 14 days.

    Not wanting to be daunted by the setback, we decided to write a letter and send it to Israel’s embassy.

    Today, a few of us went down to Israel’s embassy to hand deliver the letter to their representatives. While walking up to its perimeter, we were greeted by a few police officers. Two of them were the same officers I met when I went to Myanmar’s embassy during Aung San Suu Kyi’s visit.

    They were professional and understanding. They politely asked for our identifications and we obliged. One of the officers started videoing us while the screening was done. We also had a small talk with the officers reiterating the purpose of our visit.

    After some time, a man was seen walking out of the embassy’s compound speaking to the guard and the officers. We were then told that its representative is not able to accept our letter. We were told to send an email instead. I almost laugh at the suggestion.

    I then asked if there is anywhere I can post the letter to their letterbox but were told there is none. I then insist that there must be an avenue for mails to come through but again we were denied. In the end, we decided to leave the letter at the guard house and left the place.

    When I told some friends that I will be handing a protest letter to Netanyahu, some of my friends were concerned. They told me to stand down and not put myself in trouble. I sincerely appreciate their concerns but politely told them that they have nothing to worry as I’ll work within the perimeters of the laws.

    It is imperative that Israel should know the world is not with them when they violate international law. The burden is upon us to voice out against atrocities. If we take light of humanitarian issues, cruelty will prosper and we will then fail ourselves as a human being.

    Below is the letter that we sent to Israel’s embassy verbatim.

    ———————————-

    20 Feb 2017

    Embassy of Israel
    22 Steven Close
    Singapore257963

    Prime Minister of Israel
    Mr Benjamin Netanyahu

    Dear Mr Netanyahu,

    RE: ILLEGAL SETTLEMENT ON PALESTINIAN LAND

    We read with disgust that Israel’s Parliament passed a provocative law that would legalize Jewish settlements on privately owned Palestinian land. This new law is making stealing an official policy of Israel.

    Despite UN’s resolution demanding on Israel to “immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,” Israel has shamefully passed laws that undermine a two-state policy.

    The latest act by your parliament shows the hypocrisy of Israel that it is committed to a two-state solution. It is incongruous when a leader of your stature, endorsed such atrocious law to seize private Palestinian land but play the victim on the international stage.

    We would like to strongly register our condemnation of your administration for jeopardising the fundamentals of the peace process by disregarding the international community’s disapproval of Israel’s illegal settlement.

    Peace cannot prevail when Israel continues to act with aggression.

    Regards,
    Concerned Citizens of Singapore

     

    ———————————-

     

    Image may contain: 1 person, standing

     

    Source: Khan Osman Sulaiman

deneme bonusu