Blog

  • Children With Moderate To Severe Special Needs To Be Part Of Compulsory Education Act

    Children With Moderate To Severe Special Needs To Be Part Of Compulsory Education Act

    Starting from 2019, children with moderate to severe special needs will need to attend publicly-funded schools, just like all other children in Singapore.

    The move to extend the Compulsory Education Act to this group of children will take effect from the Primary 1 cohort three years from now.

    With the change, they will be required to attend any of the 20 government-funded special education (Sped) schools here, unless they apply for exemption.

    Minister for Education (Schools) Ng Chee Meng announced the new policy on Friday morning (Nov 4) at the annual Sped conference, saying: “This is indeed an important milestone in Singapore’s continuing drive towards national inclusiveness.

    “I am heartened to hear that nearly all children with special needs are receiving formal primary education in government-funded schools, either mainstream or Sped.”

    He noted the progress made in the Sped sector in the areas of curriculum, teaching and learning, professional development for teachers and infrastructure.

    “It is therefore timely to include our children with special educational needs within the framework established by the Compulsory Education Act. This is a reaffirmation that every child matters, regardless of his or her learning challenges,” he said.

    The policy change comes nearly five years after it was recommended by a a 32-member, government-appointed expert panel. Experts have said that including special needs children in the Compulsory Education Act would compel parents who do not send their children to school – due to lack of awareness of opportunities, or fear of their children being seen in public – to do so.

    It also guarantees to provide enough places for special needs children. Currently, some Sped schools have long waiting lists.

    The Ministry of Education (MOE) has pledged that there will be enough school places for all Singaporean children.

    A quarter – or about 440 – of the 1,770 children with special needs per cohort are currently exempt from the Compulsory Education Act, according to MOE figures. They have moderate to severe special needs, such as autism, intellectual disabilities and cerebral palsy.

    Of this, about 40 children do not go to school.

    The remaining three-quarters of the cohort – whose disabilities are mild, including conditions like dyslexia – are in mainstream primary schools.

    The Compulsory Education Act passed in 2000 requires all Singaporean children to complete six years of primary education in national schools before they turn 15. Parents can be fined up to $5,000 and/or jailed for up to a year otherwise. Besides those with moderate to severe special needs, children attending designated religious schools or being homeschooled can be exempted.

    Dr Janil Puthucheary, who is Minister of State for Education, will chair an advisory panel appointed by MOE to look into implementing the new policy.

    “Over the years, MOE and various voluntary welfare organisations have worked closely to enhance the quality, accessibility and affordability of Sped. We have also implemented measures to strengthen support for children with special educational needs in mainstream schools,” said Dr Puthucheary.

    “The advisory panel will have some work ahead, to make sure that we implement compulsory education in a way that serves the needs of all children, but with the community and the professionals coming together I’m sure we’ll be able to.”

    Mr Ng said that his ministry is mindful of the challenges involved in implementing compulsory education for children with special needs, noting that there will be a small group of children with serious conditions who cannot attend school or whose parents may still prefer to teach their children at home.

    “We will need to work out exemption processes for this group to ensure their interests and welfare are safeguarded. But the overall policy intent is clear, as is our determination to facilitate what will be in the best interests of our children.”

    The welfare community lauded the move.

    Dr Victor Tay, president of the Association for Persons with Special Needs, said that Singapore had signed the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1995, which states that every child has the right to education.

    “Somehow we did not put it into effect fully, because perhaps the Sped sector was not prepared and was still building up its resources and curricula,” he said.

    “But there has been more discussion about moving towards a more inclusive society in the last few years, and schools are more ready now for such a mandate.”

    Today, there are a total of 18,000 students with mild special educational needs in mainstream schools, while another 5,500 with moderate and severe needs are supported by Sped schools.

    These schools are provided substantial funding by MOE – significantly more than the mainstream schools – which goes towards paying specialised staff and providing tailored support for students.

    In a Facebook post on Friday, Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin said that MOE’s plan to include children with Special educational needs in the Compulsory Education Act “is a huge step in making Singapore a more inclusive society”.

    “The changes to the Compulsory Education Act support the recommendation in the Second Enabling Masterplan for more support in enabling children with special needs to access education in both mainstream and Sped schools. This will help children with special needs to realise their potential, and open up opportunities for continual learning, and employment,” he wrote.

    He noted that MOE has been working closely with Sped schools over the past few years to improve the quality of education, affordability and accessibility for students. Support for children with special needs in mainstream schools has also been improved, so that they can learn and develop in a natural setting.

    Mr Tan said the Ministry of Social and Family Development will be working with MOE and the new advisory panel to further build on efforts to enhance the learning opportunities for children with special needs, “so that they are better able to develop and build competencies”.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • Grab CEO Braces For A Fight Of Biblical Proportions With Uber

    Grab CEO Braces For A Fight Of Biblical Proportions With Uber

    It was on a late July flight home to Singapore when Mr Anthony Tan grasped the enormity of news that his biggest ally, Didi Chuxing, was about to buy out arch-rival Uber’s Chinese business.

    The stunned Grab co-founder knew better than to celebrate the vanquishing of an enemy. Unfettered by a costly battle for China, the world’s most valuable start-up would now pivot to his South-east Asian backyard. And with Didi and Uber Technologies taking stakes in each other, it spelt trouble for a global alliance forged to keep the US ride-hailing giant in check.

    Distraught, he took to his laptop and spent the next hour hammering out a rallying cry (and warning) to his 1,500 employees. Sure enough, soon after the deal, his American rival began re-deploying resources and engineers to markets from India to Latin America, while rolling out new features and services from Singapore to Hanoi.

    “There are times you just go: It’s time to rise up,” said Mr Tan, a 34-year-old who’s fond of quoting the Bible and likens Grab to David facing an Uber-Goliath. For Mr Tan, the climax of that Old Testament story wasn’t the battle itself but when “the little guy” walked down the battlefield towards his giant adversary. “That takes real courage”, the Malaysian-born chief executive officer added in his first major interview in a year.”The battle is already won if you can get to the battlefield.”

    The mission statement penned at 30,000 feet was a rare display of emotion for a man whose ultra-competitiveness lurks just beneath an unflappable demeanour, according to friends. He responded to Uber’s deal by clinching US$750 million (S$1 billion) from investors led by SoftBank Group — a record for a South-east Asian tech start-up. That money will bankroll Mr Tan’s newest endeavour: GrabPay, a mobile payments service that could set it apart in a region where about 90 per cent of transactions take place with cash.

    “Anthony hates losing,” said CEO of Vertext Ventures Chua Kee Lock, the venture arm of Singaporean state-owned investment company Temasek Holdings and Grab’s first institutional investor.

    It’s unclear how the alliance between Grab, Didi, Lyft and India’s Ola will proceed. Ms Jean Liu, Didi’s president, told a summit in San Francisco the company is a “big believer” in leveraging the knowledge and strengths of local players. Her company is said to have been in talks to join Grab’s last round of funding, though that investment never got nailed down even as other backers were announced. No one’s suggesting the quartet is breaking up and Mr Tan said the four founders remain close and still share information, but had no immediate plans to hook up their networks.

    “We’re not launching any time soon,” Mr Tan said of global roaming. “Frankly, for us, we are just focused on our local stuff.”

    Grab will take on Uber solo if needed. It’s already dispatched a clutch of rivals en route to expanding across 31 cities in six countries since its 2012 inception in a Kuala Lumpur warehouse. Uber is active in just 16 South-east Asian cities. According to App Annie, Grab topped app downloads in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam in the third quarter. Uber led in Singapore and Malaysia, Grab’s home turf.

    “We’ve charted our journey to be alone,” Tan said. “Didi did whatever it takes to win. In our case, we will do whatever it takes to win.”

    Problem is, he’s now facing a US$69 billion behemoth that’s raised over US$16 billion to date. Grab, in contrast, is said to be worth little more than US$3 billion after raising a cumulative US$1.45 billion. “Uber is growing strongly and sustainably across Southeast-Asia, which is a major focus for the company,” Uber said in an e-mail to Bloomberg.

    Mr Tan, whose great-grandfather was a taxi driver, got the inspiration to start Grab during his days at Harvard Business School. He quit the family business in Malaysia, Tan Chong Motor Holdings in 2012 and started a taxi-hailing service then known as MyTeksi with his Harvard classmate Ms Tan Hooi Ling.

    On a recent afternoon at Grab’s Singapore offices, Mr Tan talked about his vision and the hectic pace he sustains. Constant travel has taken a toll: Perched on a silver gym ball to ease the pressure on his back, his fingers were covered with blisters from hand-foot-and-mouth disease, a viral infection.

    Yet he grows energised when talking about Grab’s future. Mr Tan’s priority now is building GrabPay into a regional mobile wallet and payments service to hook users and drivers without credit cards. “We really believe that GrabPay will change the game.”

    This year, it teamed up with Ant Financial to allow Chinese travellers visiting Singapore and Thailand to pay for rides through Alipay. Customers can now hook up their Citibank credit cards to GrabPay to pay for rides with points. In Indonesia, it partnered with PT Bank Mandiri to offer a mobile wallet service, and it struck an agreement with Lippo Group to let shoppers use its app to pay at the conglomerate’s department stores, cinemas and coffee shops. All that’s intended to further Grab’s ambition of becoming a consumer Internet company that just happens to offer rides. ”We are creating the BAT of South-east Asia,” Mr Tan said, referring to China’s triumvirate of Baidu Holdings, Alibaba Group, and Tencent Holdings. “The next generation of great Internet companies in Southeast-Asia will come from Grab if we get it right.”

    Mr Tan isn’t the only one gambling against Uber: His backers include state investment firms Temasek and China Investment Corporation, as well as Tiger Global Management. The grandson of Mr Tan Yuet Foh, who co-founded an auto sales-and-assembly empire, is driven by a desire to forge his own legacy. Mr Jixun Foo, managing partner at backer GGV Capital, recalled how Mr Tan once took responsibility for a poor hiring decision he had little to do with.

    “You could always blame someone, but he took it on himself,” said Mr Foo, who sits on the board. “And he has a very strong desire to prove himself.”

    For now, Grab is fighting it out in a South-east Asian ride-hailing market with some 620 million people, forecast to grow more than five times to US$13 billion by 2025. But it’s been a topsy-turvy journey, replete with stunners like Uber’s capitulation.

    “It’s like Korean drama,” Mr Tan joked, invoking a genre known for its twists and turns and themes of revenge, betrayal and power. Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma put it best during a recent conversation, he said.

    “He said, ‘You know Anthony, life is a tsunami. When you’re up on a tsunami, get ready for the crash. When you are at the bottom, get ready for the next wave’.”

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Pelarian Mahu Jual Bayi Berusia 1 Bulan Di eBay Dengan Harga S$7,600

    Pelarian Mahu Jual Bayi Berusia 1 Bulan Di eBay Dengan Harga S$7,600

    Seorang pendatang asing ke Jerman yang memuat naik gambar bayinya ke laman eBay untuk dijual, dilarang berjumpa dengan anaknya yang baru berusia enam minggu tanpa penyeliaan.

    Bayi yang bernama Maria itu dijual di laman bidaan online tersebut oleh bapanya. Bayi itu kini sudahpun berada di bawah unit jagaan khas di Duisburg di North Rhine-Westphalia, Jerman Barat, lapor Daily Mail.

    Mahkamah kelurga di bandar itu mengarahkan ibu bayi berkenaan supaya berpindah ke unit yang sama namun bapanya hanya dibenarkan berjumpa dengan mereka di bawah penyeliaan yang ketat.

    Maria ditawarkan dengan harga €5,000 (S$7,600) dengan kapsyen: “Bayi berusia 40 hari ini bernama Maria…untuk dijual”.

    Daily Mail melaporkan, bapa bayi itu yang berusia 28 tahun dan berpindah ke Jerman sebagai pelarian baru-baru ini, menyerahkan dirinya kepada polis dan bayi tersebut diambil dan diletakkan di bawah jagaan unit khas sementara keputusan dibuat, sama ada keluarga bayi itu akan dikenakan hukuman jenayah.

    Iklan, yang memaparkan gambar-gambar Maria di laman eBay itu dipadam dalam masa 30 minit kemudian sebelum lelaki tersebut menyerah diri.

    Pihak pendakwa raya kini sedang menyiasat sama ada lelaki itu perlu dihukum atau tidak setelah dia mendakwa tidak serius dengan iklan tersebut.

    Pengarah Kesatuan Demokratik-Kristian di daerah Rheinhausen, Duisburg di mana keluarga mereka tinggal berkata: “Saya berpendapat perbuatan lelaki itu mesti dikenakan tindakan undang-undang”.

    “Jika ibu bapa bayi itu tidak mampu menanggung anak mereka dan menjaganya, kami ada menyediakan kemungkinan di Jerman supaya bayi itu diberikan sebagai anak angkat kepada keluarga lain.”

    Menurut seorang jurucakap khidmat belia di Duisburg: “Bayi itu sekarang diletakkan di bawah keluarga jagaan, di mana dia akan menetap sehingga keadaan lebih jelas.”

    Kedua ibu bapa bayi berkenaan pula kini berada di bawah pemantauan khidmat sosial, lapor Daily Mail.

    “Pihak berkuasa perubatan juga menyatakan masih ada kemungkinan Maria dikembalikan kepada ibu bapanya – jika dapat dibuktikan mereka tidak melakukan sebarang jenayah.”

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

  • 2 Workers Taking A Nap Run Over By Truck At Mandai Worksite; Driver Arrested

    2 Workers Taking A Nap Run Over By Truck At Mandai Worksite; Driver Arrested

    Two workers from Bangladesh died after they were run over at a Mandai construction site on Thursday (Nov 3).

    A tipper truck reversing towards a work area within the Mandai Depot that is under construction ran over them, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) found in preliminary investigations.

    This is the second reported fatal accident at the depot work site for the Thomson-East Coast Line this year.

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said that they were alerted to the accident at 20 Lorong Lada Hitam at 1.15pm.

    A 36-year-old man was pronounced dead at the scene, and a 47-year-old man was seriously injured.

    He was taken to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, and the hospital was alerted to be on standby to receive the patient.

    He later died in the ambulance on the way to hospital, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said.

    The workers were taking a nap on the ground when a lorry reversed over them, according to an ST reader who did not want to be named.

    “They were both sleeping on the ground after lunch. But they were not supposed to rest there. The lorry didn’t see them and reversed into them,” said a worker from the same site.

    Both workers were employees of Gammon Pte Ltd, a contractor responsible for fire protection and electrical works.

    LTA said it will work with Gammon and Jurong Primewide, the main contractor, to assist the affected workers and their families.

    A spokesman added that they are “deeply saddened” by the fatal accident.

    Police told The Straits Times that a 54-year-old driver was arrested for “causing death by negligent act”.

    MOM and the police are investigating the incident.

    In May, Mr Riyade Hussain, a 23-year-old construction worker, died after he became pinned under a truss which fell from a trailer.

    Mandai Depot is being built for the Thomson-East Coast MRT Line and is expected to be ready in 2019. It will also house a bus depot.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • Ustaz Abd’ Al-Halim: Layak Mengajar Agama Kerana Ilmu Atau Sijil ARS?

    Ustaz Abd’ Al-Halim: Layak Mengajar Agama Kerana Ilmu Atau Sijil ARS?

    AsSalaam’alaikum!

    Saya rasa ramai di Singapura perlu fikirkan – jika seseorang guru agama yang sekian lama mengajar tentang Islam tetapi tiada sijil ARS (Asatizah Recognition Scheme) maka tidak dibenarkan mengajar dimana-mana institusi keagamaan di Singapura, adakah ini bermakna ilmunya itu sudah hilang? Adakah bermakna dia sebenar-benarnya tidak layak lagi untuk mengajar? Dan jika pensijilan ARS bergantung kepada menghadirkan diri di program-program MUIS atau mana-mana program yang diluluskannya, adakah ini bermakna seseorang guru agama itu yang tidak sering menghadirkan diri tiba-tiba kehilangan ilmu agamanya?

    Tidakkah kelayakkan utama seseorang guru agama yang berhak mengajar ialah berdasarkan keilmuannya?

    Ya, mungkin juga yang bersijil itu juga berilmu TETAPI jika benar yang berilmu boleh dinafikan pensijillan maka timbul persoalan; adakah kamu mahu belajar daripada yang bersijil ataupun yang sebenarnya berilmu?

     

    Source: Abd’ Al-Halim

deneme bonusu