Tag: sentosa

  • Sentosa Rape: Prosecutors – Accused Poured Liquor Into Victim’s Mouth

    Sentosa Rape: Prosecutors – Accused Poured Liquor Into Victim’s Mouth

    A former lifeguard at Sentosa allegedly poured liquor into a partygoer’s mouth and then raped her at the beach when she was unconscious, said a witness at the High Court on Tuesday (Sep 15).

    A friend of the victim who had accompanied her to a beach party at Wave House, both of whom cannot be named to protect the victim’s identity, took the witness stand on Tuesday.

    According to the witness, she had drinks with the victim and the accused, Pram Nair, 26, on the night of May 5, 2012. Nair was a lifeguard at Sentosa then.

    The witness claimed that Nair poured liquor from a Cointreau bottle directly into the victim’s mouth for 20 seconds, and that he suggested doing so because the victim was 20 years old.

    In the opening of the prosecution’s case last month, Deputy Public Prosecutor Bhajanvir Singh said the victim was introduced to Nair at the party.

    At one point, Nair, who is represented by lawyer Peter Ong, allegedly took the intoxicated victim to the beach and raped her, he said.

    Prior to the alleged incident, the witness said she had tried looking for the victim to leave the party and found Nair supporting her as she looked “really drunk”. Nair then told her to grab the victim’s bag but the witness could not find them when she returned.

    WITNESS FOUND VICTIM “PASSED OUT” ON BEACH

    The witness called the victim on her mobile phone multiple times but no one answered. When someone did pick up one time, no one said anything on the other end, she said. She called again, and this time Nair picked up and told her they were at the beach and she need not go look for them.

    But the witness still headed to the beach and found the victim “passed out” there. She was wearing only a tank top and could not respond to anything the witness was saying. She also claimed that Nair was rummaging through his bag near where the victim was found and threw her a pair of shorts to put on the victim.

    The witness said the victim was not very coherent by then and claimed that the victim had asked her to call her boyfriend or another man called Jeremy.

    When the victim started foaming at her mouth, the witness said she called for an ambulance.

    WITNESS “UPSET” THAT ACCUSED SHOWED NO INTEREST IN HER: DEFENCE

    During the defence’s cross examination of the witness, Mr Ong challenged her statement and claimed that the witness had been the one who suggested that the liquor be poured directly into the victim’s mouth for 20 seconds.

    He then disputed the duration of that particular incident, saying that the liquor was only poured for one to two seconds.

    Mr Ong also questioned the witness’s conclusion that the victim was raped by Nair when the witness did not see him doing anything. He also suggested that the witness was upset that Nair had not shown interest in her and hence accused him of raping the victim.

    The witness on Tuesday disagreed to the above challenges made by the lawyer.

    The trial continues on Wednesday and if convicted, Nair ccould be jailed up to 20 years and fined or caned.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Former Lifeguard Accused Of Raping Relief Teacher

    Former Lifeguard Accused Of Raping Relief Teacher

    She was so afraid of her alleged rapist that she feared being in the same courtroom as him.

    Applying for the alleged rape victim to give her testimony via videolink, Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Kavita Uthrapathy told the court yesterday that the woman might break down and cry if she had to be in the same room as Pram Nair, 26.

    On the first day of the trial in which he is accused of one count each of rape and sexually penetrating the woman, the court heard that Nair, then a lifeguard at Sentosa, allegedly committed the offences at Siloso Beach, near the Wavehouse, a beach bar and restaurant, at around 2.25am on May 6, 2012.

    Justice Woo Bih Li turned down the prosecution’s application.

    This means that instead of giving her testimony via a live video link from another location, the woman, now 23, has to be physically present in the courtroom.

    However, Justice Woo said that if needed, the prosecution may reapply for her to testify via videolink in the future.

    In the opening address, DPP Bhajanvir Singh said the woman was a 20-year-old relief teacher when Nair allegedly raped her.

    The woman and a friend had attended a beach party at the Wavehouse on May 5, 2012.

    PARTY

    DPP Singh said: “It was at the party that the victim and her friend were introduced to the accused by (a man known as) Jim for the first time.

    “The court will hear that, at the party, the victim drank several different types of alcoholic beverages and quickly became intoxicated.”

    He added that Nair left the Wavehouse with the woman and took her to the beach.

    Nair, who is represented by lawyer Peter Ong, then allegedly raped and sexually penetrated her.

    Two men, Kason Tan Jia Rong and Terence Chung De Wei, were passing by when they saw the alleged offences taking place.

    DPP Singh said: “Kason saw that the victim was trying to push the accused away in a weak manner and thereafter called the 999 police hotline.”

    The police soon arrived at the scene and the woman was found to be motionless and foaming at the mouth, the court heard.

    She was rushed to the Singapore General Hospital.

    Based on information from her friend, police officers spotted Nair nearby and arrested him.

    The woman gave her testimony in camera yesterday. This means the public and the press were not allowed to observe the proceedings.

    The trial resumes today.

    If convicted of rape, Nair can be jailed up to 20 years and fined or caned.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • 10-Hour Wait For Free Cable Car Rides To Sentosa And Mount Faber

    10-Hour Wait For Free Cable Car Rides To Sentosa And Mount Faber

    Snaking queues wrapped around HarbourFront Centre Tower Two for free cable car rides on Monday (10 August) in commemoration of this year’s Golden Jubilee celebrations. The free rides were available for all Singaporeans and Permanent Residents of Singapore from 9am to 9pm on both the Sentosa and Mount Faber lines.

    So popular was the demand that some lined up since 7am, said those in the queue who spoke to Channel NewsAsia at about 4pm on Monday. Waiting time by then had stretched into the 10-hour mark, according to the Singapore Cable Car on Facebook and signposts prominently displayed around the location.

    Queues for free cable car rides at the HarbourFront Centre have not let up despite the Singapore Cable Car’s note that the wait may take about 10 hours. http://bit.ly/1KdeGzR(Video: Loke Kok Fai)

    Posted by Channel NewsAsia Singapore on Monday, 10 August 2015

    “We will not be able to accept more guests on the cable cars today. Please do not join the queue at mount Faber, Harbourfront and Sentosa stations,” the attraction wrote in its online post at about 1.15pm.

    However, apart from some heated moments earlier in the day, queues were generally orderly and the mood on the ground was mildly upbeat. Many had good words to say about the management, while some said the demand should have been anticipated.

    Staff from Singapore Cable Car were on the ground to manage the situation. Apart from stopping new arrivals, they had also been informing whatever new arrivals of the situation. They also said that a separate queue was in place from the beginning of the day for paying customers, but they might also have been affected by the heavy demand.

    Singapore Cable Car also conducted free shuttle bus services at its Mount Faber Station, which saw sizeable numbers queueing up despite the fact that rides from that station were not free.

    A Facebook user, Ronald, who was at the Mount Faber station, had sent photos to Channel NewsAsia early on Monday, saying the queue he was in “was not moving at all”.

    Long queue for cable car rides early on Monday (Aug 10). (Photo: Ronald/Facebook)

    Merely two hours before the free rides were scheduled to end, Singapore Cable Car wrote again on its Facebook page to remind the public not to join the queues at the HarbourFront, Mount Faber and Sentosa stations as it was unable to accept anymore guests.

    “Free rides for Singaporeans and PRs for the Mount Faber line have received overwhelming response … (We) thank all who patiently waited and offer our apology to those who did not get to ride today,” it said.

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Did Otters Eat Koi Worth $80,000?

    Did Otters Eat Koi Worth $80,000?

    Otters that are being spotted more often in local bodies of water in recent times may have won over many hearts here with their antics.

    However, they may have treated themselves to some very expensive meals – courtesy of a resort and a home in Sentosa. They are suspected of having feasted on ornamental koi, reportedly costing more than $80,000, in April this year.

    Mr Ben Bousnina, vice-president of resorts at Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts, did not reveal the exact cost of the koi. He said they went missing at the Rasa Sentosa Resort and Spa about the time otters were seen on the island.

    The resort has relocated the koi from its pond temporarily.

    “As the safety of our guests as well as colleagues is our highest priority, we are working closely with Sentosa Development Corporation to ensure that the otters will not be attracted to the resort,” he said.

    A report in My Paper last week said that the resort lost about $20,000 worth of koi.

    It also reported that a Sentosa Cove resident lost about $64,000 worth of the ornamental fish overnight in April .

    The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) told The Straits Times it has received feedback on only four occasions from people about otters preying on ornamental fish since the start of last year.

    Meanwhile, wildlife rescue group Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) said it was normal for otters to prey on ornamental fish.

    “They can’t differentiate wild fish from koi and will go for the easier option,” said Acres wildlife manager Kalai Vanan Balakrishnan.

    His advice for people with fish ponds in areas with otters about is to either fence the ponds or cover them with wire mesh. They should also not leave leftover food around or feed the otters.

    Wild otters are a fairly common sight at the Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park, Pasir Ris Park and the Punggol Waterway, but it was only late last year that they were spotted in Sentosa Cove.

    Mr Koh Piak Huat, divisional director of operations at Sentosa Leisure Management, said that while otters are not aggressive, residents are advised to keep their distance.

    The semi-aquatic mammals – which can survive in both fresh and sea water – may be expected in some coastal areas.

    Hence the island’s management is engaging experts to understand the mammals’ behaviour.

    “We welcome them as part of the island’s wildlife,” he said, adding that the management will work to ensure the safety of both the otters and guests.

    An AVA spokesman said the public should not approach, disturb or feed any wild animals they see. Trapping them is also illegal. The public can contact AVA at 1800-476-1600 to give feedback on wildlife.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Capturing Life Of Singapore’s Southern Islanders In A Documentary

    Capturing Life Of Singapore’s Southern Islanders In A Documentary

    Some habits die hard, especially for a group of former residents of Pulau Sudong, an island south of the Singapore mainland.

    Every Saturday and Sunday morning, about 20 of them set out from West Coast Park on their motor boats packed with traditional fish traps called bubu. These are conical iron-mesh traps placed on the seabed during low tide.

    One of these dedicated fishermen is delivery driver and father of four Hamzah Mohamad, 60, who says he seldom buys fish from the market.

    He says: “Having grown up by the sea, you get used to eating fish fresh from the sea. They have a kind of sweetness to them.”

    He now lives in a three-room HDB flat in West Coast with his wife and youngest daughter.

    These weekend fishing trips hark back to a simpler, more rustic “island lifestyle”: the fishing culture common to Pulau Sudong and the southern islands of Singapore.

    The way of life on some of these islands was considerably more communal compared with mainland Singapore.

    Each island was a self-contained community consisting of mostly Malay families. Some families subsisted on fish caught by the men while a few grew their own vegetables or kept chickens. Some had cats or goats.

    Overseen by a village chief (called the penghulu), some of these islands had amenities such as a community centre, a police post, a school, a mosque, a cemetery and a couple of provision shops. There was also a dispensary where a nurse would drop by a couple of times a week to do post-natal checks and give injections.

    Not all the islands had villages; some had specific uses. For instance, Pulau Senang was once a penal colony and Pulau Satumu had a lighthouse, and its residents were the wardens and their assistants.

    In any case, most islanders resettled on the mainland between the 1970s and 1990s for various reasons. For instance, Pulau Sudong was turned into a military live firing area while Pulau Seking and Pulau Semakau were joined to enclose a rubbish landfill.

    However, there remains considerable interest in life on these islands even though it has disappeared due to resettlement and development.

    Island life has inspired recent projects such as Balik Pulau: Stories From Singapore’s Islands, an exhibition held last August at the National Museum of Singapore.

    Most recently, these southern islanders are the subject of a documentary project called Island Nation, by photographers Edwin Koo, 36, Zakaria Zainal, 30, and Juliana Tan, 25. Their aim was to capture a part of history which they say is not recorded in textbooks.

    Their project is part of the National Library Board’s Singapore Memory Project, which showcases Singapore memories leading up to this year, when Singapore turns 50.

    Island Nation is by far the most ambitious project undertaken to record the oral history of life on 12 of the southern islands. The islands are: Sentosa, Pulau Seringat, Pulau Brani, Lazarus Island, Kusu Island and St John’s Island on the eastern part, and Pulau Bukom, Pulau Semakau, Pulau Seking, Pulau Sudong, Pulau Senang and Pulau Satumu on the western side.

    The photographers have contacted more than 100 islanders aged from their 50s to 90s to collect their stories.

    The project will showcase the memories of 30 residents going as far back as the 1940s, using different formats from photo essays and short video clips to text essays and multimedia packages.

    These will be put up on a website that will go live next month.

    In June, a photo exhibition will be staged at the Lee Kong Chian Reference Library at the National Library of Singapore.

    It will feature photographs of the islanders as well as old images from private collections, including those belonging to the handful of islanders who owned cameras.

    To be put on display, too, are photographs by the late Britain-born Ivan Polunin, who was well known for making films for the British Broadcasting Corporation on how people lived in Singapore between 1950 and 1973.

    Speaking to SundayLife!, these islanders paint a picture of frugal but tightly-knit communities which lacked modern conveniences but made up for it with generosity and friendliness.

    Mr Teo Yan Eng, 90, used to help two of his younger brothers who ran a provision shop on Pulau Seking. He says there were 58 families on the island and the 400 to 500 people there “all knew one another”.

    The Teos were the only Chinese family there, but felt totally at home. He says: “Neighbours dropped by to chit-chat even if they had nothing to buy.”

    He and his brothers did not fish, but their fishermen neighbours often shared their catch.

    During Malay weddings and Hari Raya, the brothers exchanged gifts – usually something from their provision shop or a hongbao – with their neighbours, who gave them kueh and nasi briyani.

    Although the islanders mostly interacted among themselves, with some inter-marrying, they also caught up with those from other southern islands, where they had relatives.

    There was an annual sports meet called the Pesta Five S, drawing participants from the five islands of Sudong, Semakau, Sakijang Bendera (now known as St John’s Island), Seking and Seraya. Pesta is the Malay word for carnival.

    The islands took turns to host the games, which took place over a few weekends. There were land games such as tug-of-war and soccer, as well as water games such as sampan races.

    Mr Rosli Manan, 51, a constituency support executive who was born in Pulau Sudong, recalls turning up with other village children for these meets. “It was a very lively time for the islanders,” he says.

    Life was austere then, as most of the islands lacked running water and sometimes, electricity.

    Mr Teo of Pulau Seking remembers using kerosene lamps at night. To get fresh water for cooking and drinking, his brother took 15-minute motor boat rides to Pulau Bukom, returning with big covered pails of water.

    Pulau Bukom was one of the more developed islands in the south because Singapore’s first offshore oil refinery opened there in 1961. It also had a hospital where Mr Teo’s brother was sent to when he got a sharkfish bone stuck in his foot while walking on the beach.

    Living so near the coast also made them more vulnerable to the elements. A big storm once blew off the roofs of a few attap houses, including that of the Teos’.

    Despite these challenges, Mr Teo has fond memories of his island life. He says: “The air was fresher and we had fresh fish to eat every few days.”

    In fact, a common refrain among older islanders, who have been relocated to the mainland, seems to be an intense longing for the past.

    The young looked forward to the move. Mr Rosli of Pulau Sudong says that when he had to move at the age of 15, he was very excited. He had already been spending his weekdays on the mainland at his aunt’s place as he was studying at Yusof Ishak Secondary School.

    “We were looking forward to having a new flat with better amenities.”

    His family of eight were given about $3,000 by the Government and bought a three-room HDB flat in Clementi.

    So they wrapped up their clothes and cooking utensils with bedsheets and packed them into boxes bought from the mainland. They had to be careful because there was not going to be a return trip.

    Like most of the villagers, they donated their furniture and boats to their relatives in Indonesia. Livestock such as chicken were also given away.

    Mr Hamzah adapted quickly to life in Singapore, but his late father-in-law, Mr Yakop Getim, who was born on the island and resettled on the mainland in the 1970s, could not get used to living in an HDB flat.

    He built a home for himself out of a sampan moored at West Coast Park and continued to live there till he died a few years ago. He slept on a straw mat in the sampan and used a kerosene lamp to help him see at night. He made a living looking after boats and engines for their owners.

    But for Mr Hamzah and other former Pulau Sudong residents, the island lifestyle is a thing of the past. Going out to sea every weekend to fish, and catching a glimpse of their beloved island, will have to do.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com