Tag: Singapore

  • Abdul Salim Harun: Be Rational And Give Credit Where Due

    Abdul Salim Harun: Be Rational And Give Credit Where Due

    I had a very good laugh this morning. Why? Received a pm from someone asking whether I had switch to the other side!

    I deleted him off immediately from my friend list.

    Just because I’m paying my respect to the Late Mr Lee Kuan Yew means I’m switching side? Are you an idiot to think that I’m so easily being swayed and bought? For goodness sake, go get a life!

    I’m paying my respect to him because I will not deny the facts that he had build up Singapore to what it is today. And definitely, I will not deny the facts that there are also his bad policies which affected us as Singaporeans as a whole.

    But now, he had passed away. Let’s give him the respect that he deserved as a statesman, for all that he has done for the good and well being of our belove Singapore! Is it so hard to even do that?

    For the bad policies, isn’t it good now that he’s no longer with us and each and everyone of us can now work hard to correct all those wrongs that he had made?

    You know, in this time of National Mourning, let us all be rational and not emotional. Nobody is perfect. Give the credit where it is due.

     

    Source: Abdul Salim Harun

  • Take Chance On Opposition In Upcoming GE, Kick PAP Out

    Take Chance On Opposition In Upcoming GE, Kick PAP Out

    Our only shot to topple PAP is on 2016 elections, if we don’t vote against PAP within 10 years time the new citizens population would be more than our population, they might even vote against PAP, kicked them out, formed their own party and presumably govern us.

    People can choose to either be brave and give oppositions the chance and possibly turn a lot of the bad policies around or become a minority in our country in 10 years time and maybe have to be govern by these new citizens and see our economy being handled by them.

    You all so scared the oppositions will make us suffer economically because you all think what if they aren’t good enough, in the future if the new citizens govern us will they destroy our economy?

    So which would you choose oppositions or PAP and its population white paper policy which will make you a minority in your own country and possibly being govern by these new citizens in the future and them controlling our economy when they have the majority numbers and enough votes to control us, since u don’t have enough trust in our oppositions?

    Your choice.

     

    Reader Contribution: Muhd Firdaus 

  • Tan Chuan-Jin: Singapore A Nation Coming Of Age

    Tan Chuan-Jin: Singapore A Nation Coming Of Age

    I just returned from Parliament.

    It’s 2+ am and it’s rocking…in the quiet dignified way that we do it in times like this.

    Our SAF and Home Team folks are there and manning not only the set-up at Parliament, but at water points along the way and at junctions where people needed to cross roads and streets. All with a smile and professionally doing what they need to do. Salute!

    Volunteers come forward to give out water, kueh, buns…some from the public, some from PA, and quite a number from our PAP branches from around the island. Thank you!

    I walked from Parliament to trace the way back to the source of the queue at Hong Lim Park. Chatted with fellow Singaporeans along the way. All ages, backgrounds…and some foreign friends too. Civil, polite, some stretches of queues snaking loops with only a few strategic boxes and nary a guiding rail to be seen. Took about 2-3 hours from Hong Lim but yet people were in positive spirit. “You all giving out free murtarbak or not?!” Errr. No. Only buns leh…

    And earlier at Kembangan CC, a few thousand came during the course of the day. I managed to welcome those who came in the evening. Respectful bows, tears shed, words of encouragement for us in Cabinet to stay strong and lead well, heartfelt words shared, sketches drawn. Read them… these are the words of our fellow Singaporeans.

    What do you see?

    I don’t know about you, but I don’t see a nation at crossroads or uncertain. I see a nation united not just by shared grief, but by a grateful heart for a leader who had served and led. And who had made a difference. I don’t see a flock of spineless deluded sheep, but people who have stepped forward to share their thoughts on how they feel. And how they feel! I don’t see change…because we have been changing since day one! In fact some think we change too much! Well, we will just keep making things better for our people as best as we can, as practically as we can, and with as much heart as we can.

    I think I see a nation coming of age.
    I see one strong people ready for our next lap.

     

    Source: Tan Chuan-Jin

  • Halimah Yaacob: In Grief We Have Become More United As Singaporeans

    Halimah Yaacob: In Grief We Have Become More United As Singaporeans

    Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob today (March 26) paid homage to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew in a Special Sitting of Parliament. Here is her speech in full:

    On behalf of this House, and with a heavy heart, I wish to place on record the demise of Mr Lee Kuan Yew, the Honorable Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC, and founding Prime Minister of Singapore, on March 23, 2015.

    Mr Lee’s demise is a great loss to Parliament and the people of Singapore, and it is with great sadness that this House pays tribute to the man we know as the Founding Father of Singapore. Mr Lee was an outstanding Parliamentarian and his speeches in this House were never dull or inconsequential. It was in this House that he fought many battles and shaped numerous policies to set Singapore on the right trajectory.

    Mr Lee founded the People’s Action Party in 1954, and took part in the landmark 1955 Singapore Legislative Assembly election. At the age of 31, Mr Lee secured the seat of Tanjong Pagar — a seat he held for 14 successive General Elections and one by-election. His parliamentary career spanned nearly 60 years, earning him the honour of being the longest-serving Member of Parliament in Singapore and, undoubtedly, the most illustrious of them all.

    Mr Lee became the first Prime Minister of Singapore after the People’s Action Party secured 43 of the 51 seats in the Legislative Assembly during the General Election of 1959. He took the reins of leadership for 31 years and led the then fledgling Singapore through a most uncertain time. He gave the founding generation hope and a clear sense of direction, especially when Singapore was taking its first, tentative steps as an independent nation. This was just what our forefathers needed.

    Mr Lee was a “conviction politician”. When asked in his memoirs, what it took to be a politician, he said “You must have convictions”. Mr Lee, himself, did not set out with the aspiration to be a politician. In his memoirs, he recounted that he returned to Singapore from his overseas studies to be a lawyer. But he was driven to assume public office by two convictions: One, he wanted a Singapore without a colonial master, and two, he wanted a system that focused on meritocracy.

    In Parliament, Mr Lee set very high standards for himself and expected the same from all the other Members of Parliament too. In a speech to Parliament in 1999, Mr Lee said that he wanted Members of Parliament whose “instincts are immediately for Singaporeans”. He reminded us that “Parliament as an arena for the contest of wits and wills over matters of policies will always remain important because of our system of parliamentary democracy” but that we must “make no mistake…. In this Chamber, we are playing for keeps. The future of Singapore and its people…. is not a question for light-hearted banter.” Even when he was ill and quite frail,
    Mr Lee would make tremendous effort to attend Parliament Sittings as he took his duties very seriously.

    Mr Lee never flinched from taking hard decisions, many of which were taken in this august Chamber. In 1968, when speaking on the Employment Bill, he said: “We will be judged as a government by results. These results depend, among other things, upon the morale and enthusiasm of the people, and the pace set by their leaders in Parliament and outside.”

    Mr Lee’s abiding concern was the interest and welfare of the people, even if there were painful adjustments to be made in the short term. People respected and followed him because of one very important element and that is trust. They trusted that he did not make decisions for his own self-aggrandisement or personal benefit but truly for the benefit of Singapore.

    Mr Lee’s personal leadership and his style and values helped shape the tone and the kind of parliament that we have inherited today. Deeply committed to Singapore, passionate to ensure not just Singapore’s survival but also its success, he was a leader par excellence. He had devoted his entire life to make the life of all Singaporeans better. Mr Lee has left a deep impact on this House and we will feel the vacuum. The least that we as Parliamentarians can do now is to uphold the values that he held dear when he was alive.

    In 1999, when we moved to this Chamber from the old Parliament House, Mr Lee said, “The importance of this Chamber did not, and does not, depend on its size and its grandeur, but upon the quality of men and women who occupy it as representatives of the people. By the standards of other public and private buildings in Singapore, it is modest by comparison. But that is a virtue. Behind the understatement lie great strengths of character, integrity and determination. That is what will see Singapore through not the grand statements and monuments in brick and mortar or steel and concrete, with which so many other new nations try to impress themselves and their followers”. Mr Lee could very well have described himself and his own life when he made that statement.

    Mr Lee reminded us that, “Nobody believed that we could make it, but we have. But there is no reason to believe that we will continue to make it. We will continue to make it only if there are tough-minded people who know the difference between the froth and the substance.”

    Honourable Members, it now falls upon us as Members of this House to ensure that we continue Mr Lee’s legacy of a responsible and effective Parliament, a duty we owe to the people of Singapore.

    The House records with deep regret the passing of the Honourable Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC and founding Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew. On behalf of all Members, I wish to express our deepest sympathy and condolences to the family of the late
    Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    I also wish to thank the thousands that have braved the hot sun to pay their last respects to Mr Lee for your support and sympathies. In this moment of grief, we have become even more united as Singaporeans. Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s death is indeed a grievous loss to Singapore and this House.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Masagos Zulkifli: Lee Kuan Yew Is A Father Of A Harmonious Nation

    Masagos Zulkifli: Lee Kuan Yew Is A Father Of A Harmonious Nation

    Senior Minister of State (Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Masagos Zulkifli today (March 26) paid homage to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew in a Special Sitting of Parliament. Here is his speech:

    Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s children — that was the nickname given in jest by Pangar when we visited him in Kota Tinggi whenever his friends asked about us. At that time, Singapore had recently separated from Malaysia and my uncle may be unconvinced that we will be protected in country with a Chinese majority. Before he passed away, I had the opportunity to meet him. My uncle still teases us as Lee Kuan Yew’s children among his friends. However, this time my uncle added that he was proud and full of admiration because we were able to become professionals and could compete in the Lion City with the other races.

    Similarly that is how the global community views our achievements in Singapore. The attitude of doubt and concern, whereby some even looked down at us when we separated from Malaysia, had transformed into admiration and respect. In any country whenever we flash our passport, we can feel that we are respected because we are Singaporeans. The best things that we currently enjoy in our lives would not be possible without the vision, the passion and the determination of Mr Lee. He built a developed nation that provides for the well-being of Singaporeans even though our country do not have natural resources and at that time, many Singaporeans were unemployed. In addition, racial conflicts flared up easily during that period. The whole country was tense.

    Without a doubt, I can say Mr Lee established an administration that is transparent, eradicated corruption and crime. Singapore gained the confidence of international investors who came here to work and to do business. Nonetheless for me, the most outstanding policy of Mr Lee’s came in the form of his unique social compact. After his failure in advocating a Malaysia for Malaysians, Mr Lee was determined to create a Singapore for all citizens regardless of race, language and religion. Everyone will have a space to cultivate their language, culture and religion. But at the same time, they were cajoled into accepting the government’s policy of expanding the common space so that they can mingle in housing estates, schools and their workplaces. The ghetto areas have disappeared. Slowly but surely, a multiracial society living together peacefully is embedded in the DNA of Singaporeans. That is the view of Professor S Jayakumar, whereas DPM Teo is thankful that Singapore prospers because all the leaders are mature and understood that harmony existed not because everybody got what they demanded, but harmony existed because everybody was willing to make sacrifices that may be painful at times, so that we can all prosper together.

    As a result, places of worship like the mosques, churches and temples can exist side by side and residents take turns to celebrate each other’s festivals by having open houses for their friends. And friends became closer because they shared same interests, and not because they speak the same language. It was Mr Lee who supported the creation of the Mosque Building Fund (MBF) which helped build many mosques that are magnificent and thriving. However, no matter how much funds are collected, it will be useless if the foundations of harmony are weak and are not upheld by everyone. Because mosques that will be built will face protests and those that have been built will be burned down. You can see the prove everywhere. A harmonious, multiracial society is his most precious legacy that had helped our progress while protecting the minorities.

    If a harmonious society enables the minority Muslim community to carry on with their religion peacefully, Mr Lee’s system of meritocracy became the benchmark in education and employment for everyone. The Malay community should be proud because they have proved to the world that their excellence in education and employment did not happen because there was special treatment for the minorities. We were able to achieve our success and compete in the world-class educational systems and funds were given to the Malays to succeed in education. We were successful in our careers due to our performance and our self-esteem was safeguarded and is respected by the other communities.

    When I accompanied him to Malaysia, he spoke to a leader who spread lies about the Malay community in Singapore. He challenged that the Berita Harian paper is distributed there and so that everyone can see how prosperous the Singapore Muslim community is in Singapore, and how many of their children became engineers, became scientists and became doctors. I (was) so proud to stand beside him on that day. Clearly he was proud of our achievements. Therefore it comes to no surprise the global community and world leaders I have met like Mr Tony Blair and the Grand Mufti of Egypt Shawki Alam expressed admiration toward the racial harmony that is evident in Singapore. In fact they were enthusiastic about the confidence among Muslims, who would not only perform prayers diligently in the magnificent mosques that they had built themselves but they were also able to integrate easily as Singaporeans who are able to live successfully in a meritocracy system without any favouritism. This is the identity of Singapore Muslims that was built by him.

    My heart is heavy not just because Singapore lost a leader. He has created a name for our small nation in the world. We, child of Lee Kuan Yew, as the father who was the architect of modern Singapore. Without him we would not have thought of Mendaki or the MBF. May the future generations honour Mr Lee’s contributions and build on his legacy (and) beware about instigations that may separate us … Thank you Mr Lee for leaving us a harmonious nation and identity.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu