Tag: useless

  • SPF Doing Their Job To Solve Double Robbery Cases Yet Singaporeans Give Stupid Comments

    SPF Doing Their Job To Solve Double Robbery Cases Yet Singaporeans Give Stupid Comments

    The Singapore Police Force are doing their work and are trying to apprehend the latest armed robber who took off with more than $2000 from a Western Union branch in Ubi.

    It was a surprise indeed when the country was hit with two cases of armed robbery in a short span of two days. As soon as the news broke, people have been talking about it specially about the second case where the photo of the robber was captured on cctv.

    On facebook, there were some people who apparently had more free time to say stupid things. When one person say something stupid, many others appeared to join in the fun.

    But are they even thinking clearly? Shooting their mouths off so naturally as if they don’t use their brains. Bodoh siol.

    They expecting police to apprehend offenders before they commit a crime ah? They think police officers same as fortune tellers? Can predict where crimes are going to happen?

    And when the photo of the armed robber wearing a white full face helmet and a black jacket was sent to the public in a bid to appeal for information, some say no point. So if only got that photo, what do you want the police to do? Exchange it with a more casual one where the culprit smiling and doing a cute pose?

    Hard to please? Even Straits Times replied to say that every little detail helps.

    Some people are really useless, not constructive and are just a hindrance to society. Macam-macam hal lah. Nak ketawa atau nak nangis pon tak tahu..

    Anyway, good luck to the Singapore Police Force.

     

    Rilek1Corner

  • S Iswaran:  Exercise Restraint And Let Due Process Take Its Course

    S Iswaran: Exercise Restraint And Let Due Process Take Its Course

    SINGAPORE – Some individuals have “gone too far” in their reactions against the unethical practices of the errant retailer at Sim Lim Square, said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office S Iswaran today (Nov 8), as he said that police have begun looking into reports on the case, as well as a related report on harassment.

    In a Facebook post today (Nov 8), Mr Iswaran, who is also Second Minister for Home Affairs & Trade and Industry, spoke up about the recent incident at Sim Lim Square. He urged people to “exercise restraint” and not to take matters into their own hands. “Let due process take its course,” he wrote.

    Photo: Screengrab from Minister S Iswaran’s Facebook page

    Mr Jover Chew, owner of the shop Mobile Air at Sim Lim Square, was in the spotlight recently following reports of Vietnamese tourist Pham Van Thoai going on his knees to beg for his money back, and that the shop refunded a customer more than S$1,000 in coins.

    On Thursday, a T-shirt printed with an expletive was placed outside his shop, which was closed. Mr Chew’s particulars, which were leaked online, were also reportedly used to order three large pizzas to his home on Wednesday. His private photos were also leaked.

    Mr Iswaran said that the Government is looking into measures to protect consumers better but this may “take some time”, especially if the laws require amending.

    “More immediately, we are working with CASE and other stakeholders to educate consumers on their rights, so that they do not fall prey to such sales tactics, and know where and how to seek recourse when necessary,” he added.

    Member of Parliament Vikram Nair also wrote on Facebook today of his interest in looking into Singapore’s consumer protection laws. Referring to an article by TODAY, he singled out the suggestion by a lawyer to give the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) additional powers to administer fines to errant businesses.

    Photo: Screengrab from MP Vikram Nair’s Facebook page

    “Although it is highly unusual to give a consumer association such powers, I believe the public expects CASE to not only be a consumer advocate, but also to intervene more directly in cases where consumers,” he wrote.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • The CASE For And Against Online Vigilantism

    The CASE For And Against Online Vigilantism

    By now, many would be familiar with Mr Jover Chew and his shop at Sim Lim Square.

    The spotlight has recently been on him and Mobile Air after reports of foreign customers’ bad experience surfaced in mainstream media.

    But when Mr Chew showed no remorse in subsequent interviews, including with The New Paper, and Mobile Air continued its daily operations despite the bad press, infuriated netizens took matters into their own hands.

    On Tuesday night, Facebook page SMRT Ltd (Feedback) named and shamed Mr Chew, 32, and his wife.

    Photos of them, their contact numbers and Mr Chew’s properties were also listed on the Facebook page.

    And it seems that Mr Chew has succumbed to the pressure. When The New Paper visited Sim Lim Square yesterday, the shop was closed. Mr Chew has also diverted his calls to another number.

    Previously, Mobile Air did not cease operations despite regularly making it to the Consumers Association of Singapore’s (Case) blacklist of Sim Lim Square tenants.

    Some businesses on the list, like Cyber Maestro, simply switch their signboards and it’s business as usual.

    Cyber Maestro, which was slapped with a court injunction on Monday, gave way to a new tenant, Megacentrix Technologies, and subtenant VS One in August.

    But a check revealed that the person behind VS One is related to the boss of Cyber Maestro.

    The two businesses also share the same registered address. The shareholders of the two businesses are husband and wife. This is where the problem lies, said lawyer Steven Lam.

    “With the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA), what comes out of it is a civil remedy,” he said.

    “You can sue the offending business, but many of them simply close down and wind up.

    “Then, they open another company under different shareholders who are shadow directors.”

    He suggested a dedicated enforcement body to clamp down on errant retailers for more “regulatory bite”.

    Mr Lam also cautioned against netizens’ online shaming.

    “Although it may seem to be effective, don’t forget there’s the Prevention of Harassment Act. They have to be a bit careful about where the line is drawn.”

    Singapore Management University’s law professor Eugene Tan feels that the netizens’ disgust with Mr Chew does not justify their actions.

    INTRUSIVE

    He said: “At another level, it’s over-zealous and self-righteous. Regardless of the legitimacy of the cause, the actions by netizens are disproportionate and intrusive. Two wrongs don’t make a right.”

    Case executive director Seah Seng Choon thinks that a civil law is sufficient for now.

    “I think that for the time being, given that we have a civil law in place, this is really sufficient,” he said.

    “We can try to speed up our action by serving voluntary compliance agreements faster or hopefully get injunctions speedier to stop errant retailers.”

    Mr Seah added that Case is already “doing a lot behind the scenes” to help consumers resolve their cases.

    As CPFTA is a civil act, it will take some time to go through the necessary process to stop the unfair practices, he pointed out.

    “It is a big thing for the person affected, but we can’t jump in at the first instant when there’s a complaint. Sometimes, it may be just a one-off (incident) because of some bad employees,” Mr Seah said.

    “Errant retailers can continue their businesses, but they must understand that the law will catch up with them.”

    Rather than a legal issue, lawyer Kang Kim Yang feels that the onus is on consumers to be more cautious.

    “To me, it doesn’t seem like an elaborate way of deception. You may say that the retailers are morally wrong, but sometimes, they are playing within the rules,” he said.

    “Consumers should be reading the fine print and inquire at a few other shops before making an informed decision.”

    [email protected]

    Blacklisted shops

    These shops at Sim Lim Square have been blacklisted by the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) for the period of August to October.

    Shop name: Number of complaints

    Mobile Air 25

    Gadget Terminal 13

    Mobile22 10

    Mobile Apps 9

    Mackin 7

    Mobile Planet 7

    K-One Mobile 4

    Megacentrix Technologies 4

    SLR Pro 4

    Cyber Maestro 3

    Source: Consumers Association of Singapore

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com