Blog

  • The Lives They Live: She Fell For Her Man After Marriage

    The Lives They Live: She Fell For Her Man After Marriage

    In 1961, Madam Zulaika Mohamad Osman agreed to marry a man she had never met.

    She was 21.

    He was double her age, at 41 – a widower with one daughter.

    The matchmaker was a Chinese neighbour of hers, who worked with Mr Ismail Awang in the same construction company.

    Madam Zulaika, who has never gone to school, said in Malay: “My neighbour told me my husband was a good man and he would make a good husband and father. I said ‘yes’ immediately as I trusted my neighbour as he was like family to me.”

    Arranged marriages were the norm in those days, the 77-year-old said, and it did not occur to her that she should try to get to know her suitor before saying “I do”.

    So she said “yes” to the big question – without even knowing what her groom looked like or dating to see if they were compatible.

    About a month after she agreed to the match, Mr Ismail, a storeman, went to her home to propose marriage through her elders and the couple met for the first time.

    She was so nervous during that first meeting that she grabbed a relative’s baby to cover her face when he asked to see her.

    And she spent the rest of his visit hiding in the kitchen.

    They did not speak at all.

    “When I saw my husband for the first time, there were no feelings (of love). The feelings came later,” she said. “What struck me was that his hair was white. Even his eyebrows were white.”

    Three months later, they held their wedding ceremony.

    Match-made unions were the norm in Singapore back then, noted sociologist Mathew Mathews. The practice died out as a growing number of women became educated, joined the workforce and sought to make their own choices in life, he said. However, in pre-independence Singapore, educational and employment opportunities for women were limited and being match-made by one’s parents or relatives was the norm. Besides, everyone was expected to get married and start a family, said the senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies.

    “There was also a greater expectation to follow parental wishes and one of the parents’ roles was to help ensure a good marriage match for their children,” he said.

    “Arranged marriages have always been associated with growing in love, rather than falling into love. Today’s notions of marriage differ considerably – people often don’t enter into marriage unless they fall in love.”

    Indeed, Madam Zulaika and Mr Ismail grew into love. Both shared common experiences, having suffered the loss of loved ones.

    She was an orphan. Her mother died of tuberculosis when she was just five. Her father, who did maintenance work in a market, died of a heart attack when she was in her teens. The second of six children, she started earning her own keep by washing clothes for others when she turned eight or nine.

    He was just as bereft, having lost his first wife and two children to various illnesses. He was left with just one daughter.

    After marriage, Mr Ismail became a hands-on husband and father, who helped around the house.

    This was unlike Madam Zulaika’s experience with other men.

    Growing up, all the men she saw left the chores and child-rearing to the women but not her husband. He changed diapers, bathed the children and helped with housework.

    “He also treated my family very well. He was very kind and would always help others. He was also a very gentle person,” she said.

    After a few months of matrimony, she found herself falling for his kindness and gentleness.

    He was ever ready to open his wallet and even his house to those in need. For example, he bought groceries for a relative whose husband abandoned her so that she would not go hungry. Relatives who needed temporary shelter were always welcome at their three-room flat in MacPherson.

    But Mr Ismail died suddenly of a heart attack after 17 years of marriage. He was 58 years old.

    The first few years after his death were the toughest. The couple have six children – two sons and four daughters. Their youngest child was only nine then.

    Madam Zulaika, who had worked throughout her marriage as a cleaner, continued to do so and only stopped in her late 40s when her children were all grown up.

    Today, five of her six children are married – and as a reflection of the times, all married for love. None of them went for arranged unions.

    This is a relief for Madam Zulaika who said she did not have to worry about her children’s marriages as they found spouses on their own.

    The youngest child, Ms Saleemah Ismail, 48, who is single and works in a charity, said of her parents’ marriage: “My parents had a great marriage and we grew up in a loving and nurturing home.”

    Madam Zulaika is now a grandmother to 11 and has three great grandchildren.

    “I miss my late husband and his gentleness. But my children love me the way that he loved me and so I don’t feel any missing holes in my life,” she said. “I feel we were destined to be together. I feel very lucky to have married him.”

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com

  • Singapore Graduate Marries Malay Man In Secret Against Racist Mum’s Wishes

    Singapore Graduate Marries Malay Man In Secret Against Racist Mum’s Wishes

    I first got together with my Malay Muslim husband when I was 17 and I converted when I was 18. 2 weeks after I turned 21, we got married and have been happily married for the past 4 years. When I got married, I didn’t dare tell my racist mother as I was the only child. We also faced a lot of resistance from his mother because I wasn’t Malay. My mum only knew about my marriage after I graduated from university. I didn’t tell her not because I didn’t have the guts, but it was because I didn’t want her unkind words to poison my new marriage.

    She’s tolerating of my husband now, and she’s unable to make anymore snide remarks on seeing that I’m a thousand times happier living with him than I was with her. I went for the Islamic religious courses, do believe in Allah, but until today my mum has no idea that I converted. I don’t eat pork and I never found the Islamic laws to be much of a restriction to my daily life.

    I think when you’ve found the right guy to stick with you through thick and thin, nothing else matters. But choosing the right guy is really really important. Everything else is just secondary. Choosing my husband when I was 17 was the best decision of my life. I can’t imagine what my life would have turned out to be without him.

    Btw, he’s 12 years older than me, so I had lots of people judging us. People would ask, why you marry a Malay guy. And each time I faced their questions with a strong pride in my voice, “why not?” That usually shut them up. When we go out we overheard other people’s remarks like “got no Chinese guy to find meh?” But I never had to give them any fucks because I’m proud of my choice, and proud of my interracial marriage. Let the haters bitch as much as they want.

     

    Source: https://www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Eggs When Splattered Cannot Be Unscrambled; Orchard Road

    Eggs When Splattered Cannot Be Unscrambled; Orchard Road

    Early this morning a cartons of eggs, believed to have fallen out of a vehicle, blocked off at least one lane along Orchard Road.

    The spillage of broken eggs, on the second lane outside Mandarin Gallery, stretches for about the lengths of three fire engines. Some might say that it looked like a work of art. An interesting piece too.

    Photos of the scene quickly spread over the internet.

    The driver whose eggs belongs to was not there and is believed to have fled the scene.

    Surprisingly the splattered eggs did not seem to have caused damaged to vehicles in the area either based on the photos.

    Some road users were actually more surprised to see fully armed police in black directing traffic at the incident area. There were four of them standing beside two motorbikes. It is not clear if they happened to be in the area or that they were actually tasked to render assistance.

     

    Moral of the story: This is why you don’t place all of your eggs in one basket. Lorry driver mana??

     

    Rilek1Corner

     

  • Commentary: MPs Running TCs Is A Terrible Idea. Skill Set Of Good TC Manager Entirely Different From That Of MP

    Commentary: MPs Running TCs Is A Terrible Idea. Skill Set Of Good TC Manager Entirely Different From That Of MP

    MPs running town councils is a terrible idea that largely only serves to effectively stifle opposition politics in Singapore by raising near impossible barriers to entry.

    The skill set of a good town council manager is entirely different from that of an MP. The council manager is a real estate manager of a massive public cum private housing estate and infrastructure. This requires specialist skills and experience and is rightfully the work of a well resourced public stat board like the HDB who used to manage all estates before MPs ran town councils or mayoralties.

    Singapore HDB and housing residents deserve the expertise and economies of scale possessed by HDB and public agencies in running their precincts rather than have such management and investment in needed infrastructure improvements be held hostage to shorter term political manoevering or lack of experience or resources over electioneering cycles.

    An MPs job on the other hand is to primarily question policies and legislation in parliament on behalf of the electorate. This requires a total different skill set and the substantial time and resources needed to do this effectively.

    He or she also to see that the needs of his constituents are met efficiently and adequately by relevant agencies not to be bogged down by the Augean task of managing huge hosing estates him or herself. Especially if they have to duplicate management systems that previous incumbents refuse to share.
    Not to mention the duplication of administrative resources by different electoral precincts.

    Finally and equally importantly, the provision of estate management services and allocation infrastructure is a public good and should never be used as a political tool.

    The bulk of most citizens net worth or life savings is in their home. To have its value held hostage to voting in a powerful incumbent government that controls the agencies responsible for such activities is both a breach of citizens rights as well as a recipe for authoritarian rule.

    And to make relatively inexperienced opposition MPs financially liable for any mismanagement in spite of best intentions is to effectively raise the bar for an opposition politician that would otherwise be effective in questioning policies way too high to be of any real benefit to citizens.

    The public is thus short changed both ways in terms of optimal public housing management as well as political representation.

    Please note that all this cuts institutionally both ways. If the PAP ever found itself in minority opposition again , it may never be able to return from the political wilderness beyond the impregnable walls of their own creation.

     

    Source: Lam Keong Yeoh

  • Uncle’s Friend Dirtied Car With Vomit, Uncle Unfairly Takes It Out On Valet Driver, Boasted To Attending Police Officers That He Got Money

    Uncle’s Friend Dirtied Car With Vomit, Uncle Unfairly Takes It Out On Valet Driver, Boasted To Attending Police Officers That He Got Money

    You needed a driver (even from East Coast Park lagoon to CCK n Jurong West), we provided one. You needed to drop a friend home, we followed your instructions. But we didn’t tell your friend to vomit in your car!!

    You wanted us to drive you to nearest car wash near your house and we did. Along the way you couldn’t stand the smell of vomit in your new car and got angry with your friend, why take it out on our driver? Why be vulgar and aggressive with Uncle Kumar?

    Upon reaching the petrol station you refused to pay and even challenged a bystander who tried to mediate after seeing you verbally abuse our driver? You even boasted you had money to the police but refuse to pay unless our driver washed the car for you??!!

    Uncle Kumar is one of our most humble, obliging and patient drivers we have. He came to work on a Sunday night to earn a little more to support his family and to ensure drinkers get home safely. Why pick on him when it’s your friend that dirtied your car?!

    We will be lodging a police report against you not for the $38.00 you refuse to pay but for the way you took our driver for granted and for your bullying act.

    To all other drive home valet service providers, this may happen to your drivers as well. Don’t ever let this or any other bullies take our drivers for granted. We are only providing a service to keep our roads safer and to ensure drinkers get home safe.

    #saynotobullies

     

    Source: Drive Home Service Singapore