Tag: masterplan

  • Singaporeans Support Petition To Retain Sungei Road Flea Market

    Singaporeans Support Petition To Retain Sungei Road Flea Market

    The Sungei Road flea market’s last day of operation is on July 10 but the hawkers are hoping to be given an alternative or temporary site that will allow them to continue their business.

    On Thursday (Feb 23), Mr Koh Ah Koon, 76, the president of the Association for the Recycling of Second Hand Goods, unfurled a banner at Sungei Road calling for the site to be conserved.

    Speaking to The Straits Times later, Mr Koh said he was saddened but hopes an alternative site can be allocated for the hawkers.

    “We don’t need a permanent location and can move. We hope the government can give us a temporary site so that our lifestyle and this aspect of local heritage can be retained.”

    He said he has printed 10 banners and plans to collect signatures till July to support calls for the site to be “conserved” or retained. By 7pm on Feb 23, he had collected about 200 signatures.

    The Government said the free hawking zone has to make way for future residential developments in a multi-agency statement last Tuesday.

    Mr Koh’s association, which represents about 70 of 200 vendors at the flea market, had previously proposed four alternative sites – next to Rochor River, at Kampong Bugis along Kallang River, behind Sim Lim Tower and a roadside near Jalan Kubor Malay cemetery.

    But the authorities said the four sites had been zoned for parks and residential use under Master Plan 2014.

    After the Government announcement, the association submitted a fresh appeal to extend the deadline until the end of the year. If that fails, it hopes to secure a temporary site in Jalan Besar behind a hawker centre.

    Mr Kalay V., 45, a businessman who signed the petition said: “This provides the elderly hawkers a legitimate source of income and can be seen as an engagement programme for seniors – not that different from those run by community centres.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Singapore Doesn’t Lack Space For Population Of 10 Million

    Singapore Doesn’t Lack Space For Population Of 10 Million

    “Land scarcity is a very real problem for Singapore, which explains the ever-increasing land costs and property prices which are driven by pent-up demand.”
    — SGPropertyReviews.com,
    Jan 11, 2014

    Singaporeans have been brought up to accept statements like this as a gospel truth. Many do not even question the meaning of scarcity and without looking at the growth of the nation, do not realise that Singapore’s land size has increased by 100 square kilometers in the last 35 years. Add to that the advances in space planning, improved transport systems, enhanced construction capabilities leading to a much higher population density and “Voila!”, we have 5.54 million people today.

    Traffic travels along the Tampines Expressway past public buildings in Punggol (right), while a man enters his home in Sengkang, where the number of flats under HDB management are projected to increase to 92,000 from the current 59,497

     The brief statistics are, in the 35-year period between 1980 and 2015, our population grew 129% from 2.41 million to 5.54 million, made possible by a 16% increase in land size from 617.9 sqkm to 719.1 sqkm and a 97% increase in population density from 3,907 people per sqkm to 7,697 people per sqkm.

    Table 1: Singapore’s land size grew by 100 sqkm while her population grew by 3.1 million over the 35-year period from 1980 to 2015.

    Year Population Land size Population density (per sq km)

     1980*

    2,413,945

    617.9

    3,907

    1985

    2,735,957

    620.5

    4,409

     1990*

    3,047,132

    633.0

    4,814

    1995

    3,524,506

    647.5

    5,443

     2000*

    4,027,887

    682.7

    5,900

    2005

    4,265,762

    696.9

    6,121

     2010*

    5,076,732

    710.4

    7,146

    2015

    5,535,002

    719.1

    7,697

    Notes:
    * Census of population
    Prior to 2003, data are based on Singapore’s land area as at end-December. From 2003 onwards, data are based on Singapore’s land area as at end-June.
    Data on population from 2003 onwards exclude residents who have been away from Singapore for a continuous period of 12 months or longer as at the reference period.
    Source: SingStat, Century 21 (IPA)

     

    Even though land reclamation allowed us to increase our land mass, there are many amongst us who do not feel that there is ever enough, and continue to insist that 719.1 sqkm of land is considered scarce.

    Scarcity or otherwise, let us at least recognize that we have carried a misconception for several generations: the phrase “land is scarce” does not equate to “space is scarce”. We have been stacking more and more people on top of one another and packing people closer together to create higher and higher population density.

    Technology has improved. Our capabilities have improved. Lifestyles have changed. Today we are better able to accommodate higher population densities because of better construction standards, better space planning, better transport systems and we have flexible working hours with many knowledge workers working longer hours in cafes and from homes.

    For those who have not been putting the various pieces of the Master Plan together, we present a summary of various pieces of “work in progress” in the real estate front that will allow Singapore to accommodate a 10 million population from around the year 2050. We also make the bold assumption that the Transport and Health authorities are expanding their capacity to match the population increase.

    One more somewhat audacious assumption on the back of our low birthrates: Singapore’s environments and economy will remain sufficiently attractive such that there is a constant stream of population inflow to sustain a population growth to 10 million people.

    Based on scattered bits of public information announced over the past few years and gluing them together with our assumptions, the sections below will reveal to us how the residential landscape can evolve to house our growing population.

    Existing HDB towns – 535,144 more units in the pipeline

    Table 2 provides us with a glimpse of the long term dwelling plans undertaken by the Housing & Development Board (HDB). For 23 of the HDB towns, their total land area and the total number of flats currently being managed by HDB. The projected maximum number of dwelling units, which includes HDB flats and future government land sales for private residences, are also listed. Do note that the projected ultimate number does not include residences that will be built on private land, or enbloc redevelopments of apartments on state land.

    Table 2: HDB towns and their projected target of dwelling units.

    HDB towns

    Land size (Ha)

    Flats under
    HDB management

    Projected ultimate
    number of units

    Ang Mo Kio

    638

    49,169

    58,000

    Bedok

    937

      60,115

    79,000

    Bishan

    690

    19,664

    34,000

    Bukit Batok

    785

    32,275

     53,000

    Bukit Merah

    858

    51,885

     68,000

    Bukit Panjang

    489

    34,463

     44,000

    Choa Chu Kang

    583

    42,393

    62,000

    Clementi

    412

    25,480

    39,000

    Geylang

    678

    29,256

    49,000

    Hougang

    1,309

    51,646

    72,000

    Jurong East

    384

    23,379

    30,000

    Jurong West

    987

    71,755

    94,000

    Kallang/Whampoa

    799

    35,740

    57,000

    Pasir Ris

    601

    29,207

    44,000

    Punggol

    957

    35,515

    96,000

    Queenstown

    694

    30,546

    60,000

    Sembawang

    708

    20,311

    65,000

    Sengkang

    1,055

    59,497

    92,000

    Serangoon

    737

    21,293

    30,000

    Tampines

    1,200

    66,599

    110,000

    Toa Payoh

    556

    36,439

    61,000

    Woodlands

    1,198

    62,675

    98,000

    Yishun

    778

    56,698

    84,000

    Other Estates

    22,856

    25,000

    Total

    968,856

    1,504,000

    To be built

    535,144

    Note:
    “Toa Payoh” town includes Bidadari
    “Other Estates” include Bukit Timah, Central Area and Marine Parade
    Land size includes private developments on private and state land.
    Projected ultimate figures include private developments under Government Land Sales Programme.
    Source: HDB “Key Statistics – HDB Annual Report 2014/15”, Century 21 (IPA)

    From the differences in the totals, we see that sufficient land has been set aside to build another 535,144 dwelling units in the next decade and beyond. However, these units reside purely within HDB towns and various large private residential estates such as Bukit Timah, Newton-Novena, Tanglin and the Downtown Core have not been included.

     New residential precincts – an additional 534,000 units?

    In the past 10 years, announcements have been made regarding new residential precincts such as Woodlands North Coast, Jurong Lake District, Tampines North and Bidadari. The additional housing capacity planned in these new precincts have been included in the projected ultimate numbers listed under the HDB towns of Woodlands, Jurong East, Tampines and Toa Payoh in Table 2.

    In addition, there are four more new residential precincts that are being planned.

    The operations in Paya Lebar Air Base will cease from 2030 onwards and we may expect the first HDB flats to begin construction perhaps two years later. The advantage this brings to the immediate neighbourhoods such as Hougang and Aljunied is that height restrictions may be lifted and plot ratios increased significantly.

    Fancy being a resident of Pulau Brani? The Greater Southern Waterfront will begin its transformation from 2027, when the City Terminals start to relocate to Tuas, followed by the Pasir Panjang Terminal around year 2030.

    Tengah could be named as a new HDB town when details of its plans are revealed. This precinct has been set aside in the master plans for some time now and with the recently announced plans to develop the new Jurong Innovation District, plans for the Tengah new town could be accelerated.

    The overall plans for Marina South Residential District was crystallised starting from a design competition held in 2007. Plot ratios assigned to the residential blocks at “Gardenfront Residences” are relatively high at between 4.9 and 5.6, allowing the lucky residents to have a clear view over the Sky Trees in Gardens By The Bay.

    Increasing plot ratio, improving space planning

    Intensifying land use and increasing population density are made possible through several elements. Plot ratios across the country can be increased due to better planning and integration with public transportation and changing lifestyles. Example can be seen from the rebuilding of old estates such as Commonwealth, Tanglin and Dawson where old 10-storey blocks with open-air carparks were demolished and replaced with new 40-storey blocks that are built closer and integrated with amenities such as carparks, clinics, supermarkets and community facilities to boot.

    In private housing, apartment sizes are shrinking, especially when the increase in single person households support the proliferation of shoebox units. The smaller average size of apartments has led to an increase of about 20% more residential units than what is planned for each government land parcel sold.

    Looking forward

    The current total stock of residential units exceeds 1.3 million and together with alternative accommodation types such as dormitories and serviced apartments, Singapore can comfortably house 5.54 million people. Based on the tabulations in the sections above, I believe that Singapore has sufficient capacity to add 1.1 million more housing units without further reclamation of land. We can then comfortably welcome another 4.5 million people.

    Someone recently said that “with inflation, the rising cost of living and land scarcity, property prices will continually rise in Singapore over time, which makes property a great investment.” I think he will be correct, provided we can continue to keep the population growing.

    Ku Swee Yong is a licensed real estate agent and the CEO of Century 21 Singapore. He recently published his fourth book “Weathering a Property Downturn”.

    This article appeared in The Edge Property Pullout, Issue 727 (May 9, 2016) of The Edge Singapore. 

    Related Articles From TheEdgeProperty.com.sg

     

    Source: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com

  • URA Deputy CEO – Conservation Had To Take A Backseat To Development In The 1960s

    URA Deputy CEO – Conservation Had To Take A Backseat To Development In The 1960s

    In an exclusive interview with Channel NewsAsia, the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s (URA) Chief Planner and Deputy Executive Officer Lim Eng Hwee said URA intends to intensify efforts to decentralise business activities and commercial centres outside the city.

    Decentralisation is a way to achieve a more sustainable growth by distributing commercial activities to various parts of the island, such as Tampines, Jurong and Paya Lebar – as well as an upcoming one stretching from Woodlands to Punggol, called the North Coast Innovation Corridor.

    Q: What is URA’s key strategy for the next decade?

    A: Broadly and conceptually, we have always talked about decentralising activities, but we think there is opportunity for us to really intensify, to work across all the agencies to make it happen – and in the process create something that is quite unique.

    Take Jurong as an example. Before we launched the development, the masterplan in 2008, people’s impression of Jurong is: It is near an industrial area; it is not attractive; there is only one shopping mall. With Jurong East today, once you have coordinated effort across agencies, partnerships with the private sector to try to integrate things together, it can take a very refreshing look.

    Tampines Regional Centre has achieved a certain critical mass, it right now has a couple of hundred square metres of office space; it has three significant malls. So in terms of serving the residents’ needs it is adequate for now, but Tampines is still being developed. We see the Tampines regional centre and Changi Business Park – which is right next to the new SUTD University – as a twin hub that anchors major business and commercial activities.

    The location of these two twin centres, in particular the Business Park, is right next to Changi Airport. In time, the next 10 years or so, Changi Airport will be expanded and there will be a lot more activities happening in Changi. The whole of Singapore’s East will be a very significant hub.

    Q: Long-term and forward-looking planning has been entrenched in the land use development process in Singapore. How has this enabled Singapore to be more nimble in seizing opportunities?

    A: I would say it is a very strategic advantage to Singapore. We were talking to some of the financial institutions and even sharing, doing exchanges with other cities. You realise that for other cities, when it is time for them to seize opportunities and obtain investments to expand, they were hindered by the availability of land. It is not just land – many cities are much bigger than Singapore, so it is not difficult to find land – but having land in a right location, at a right time that allows you to expand your business investment. To us that gives us an opportunity.

    Planning is neverending so these are the type of questions we ask ourselves. Among the agencies we sit down together and brainstorm – whether there are new ideas, whether we can leverage on some of these opportunities.

    We know in the longer term, the port will be consolidated in Tuas for example, so there must be a lot of opportunities for us not only to take away the freight traffic now in Keppel, Pasir Panjang, where there’s haulage in that area. When you consolidate, you take away that traffic and when you have so many trucks moving around serving the port, surely the logistics industry can find some way to extract maximum efficiency. It can create a logistics hub; it can create things which companies can share the services.

    Likewise, the same concept can apply to Changi, when we start to grow aviation not just for passengers, but also the cargo, the aviation industry. Whether it is maintenance, repair and operations or logistics companies, when they start to congregate around the airport, again there will be opportunities for us to do something.

    In planning what we can do is discuss with agencies, including economic agencies, to look at what some of these opportunities are, and make sure there is land safeguarded for these new ideas to take place.

    Q: Were there any “planning mistakes” and what has been done to rectify them?

    A: I am not sure if this is a mistake. Often you make certain decisions in the context of the situation at that point in time. One particular area is perhaps in the area of conservation. For obvious reasons, in the 60s and 70s, we were faced with huge challenges – unemployment, the acute housing shortage, and the city centre was so crowded.

    The focus was not on whether heritage buildings should be conserved. So you see a lot of massive, comprehensive redevelopment, where so many old buildings were removed. Looking back in hindsight of course, we say some of these unique buildings ought to be kept.

    Starting from the 80s, the planners and the decision makers at that point in time started to think about whether we should start to retain these heritage buildings which are important anchors for future generations. The buildings will provide a link for them to identify with their past. So the conservation journey really started in the 80s.

    Having kept these buildings is not enough. Having retained them, I think we should now think about how can we help people to understand more of the history behind these buildings. We have to encourage people to start talking about the buildings, and share their personal stories so that the younger generation, when they look at the building, they understand the history behind them. I would not think that the decision made then to demolish the buildings as mistakes – it is really contextual.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com