Tag: Muslim community

  • The Curious Case Of Geylang’s Ramadan Bazaar

    The Curious Case Of Geylang’s Ramadan Bazaar

    Ramadan has barely began and yet there’s been a couple of controversies surrounding the food items on sale at Geylang’s annual Ramadan Bazaar. From vendors selling non-halal dendeng meat to the rise of hipster stalls whose halal status can’t be verified, this has caused the general Muslim population in Singapore scratching their heads in confusion.

    Geylang Serai has its roots as a Malay village, while its surrounding areas were well known for commercial activities targeted to the needs of the Malay community. The Ramadan Bazaar in Geylang Serai originated decades ago, even before Singapore’s independence, where vendors would lay their goods and items on groundsheets by the roads. These annual bazaars last for the entire month of Ramadan, serving as not only a place for Muslims to break their fast, but also to shop for their Hari Raya preparations.

    However, the Ramadan Food Bazaar in Geylang this year has been tainted with news of stalls having questionable halal status, a huge irony since the bazaar should be targeting a largely Muslim population. The last few years have seen a rise in hipster stalls selling modern food items, a welcoming change enabling us to celebrate the diversity. On the other hand, there has been no effort by any relevant bodies to ensure the halal status of the food items being sold.

    A couple of years ago I was serving the nation as a Police Officer patrolling the bustling Ramadan Bazaar. On one of the occasions, a Member of Parliament from Marine Parade GRC came down to visit the said Bazaar. It has always crossed my mind whether or not there are any efforts from the organizing committee to ensure the halal status of the food items being sold, for 5 years ago, I started seeing non-Muslims taking up food stalls in Geylang’s Ramadan Bazaar. However, upon asking the said MP, she simply said that the bazaar is open to all individuals.

    The fact that the bazaar is still standing on the grounds of Geylang Serai pays tribute to the rich historical significance and the cultural life of the Malays in Singapore. While I am all for a multiracial, multi-religious and a cosmopolitan Singapore, I strongly feel that the traditions and origins of the Ramadan Bazaar has to be safeguarded. While the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) may view the individual stall’s halal status as being out of their jurisdiction, couldn’t this problem be alleviated by giving priority to Malay Muslim vendors?

    Take a stroll along Geylang’s Bazaar Ramadan a few days before its opening, you’ll see rows of stalls snapped up by non-Muslims and subsequently leased out to the makcik-makcik bazaar you see today. Certain stalls are still manned by non-Muslims who hire ‘Malay-looking workers’ from around Southeast Asia to sell their questionable food items. More often than not, these workers don’t even have a clue as to what they are selling, and the origins of the food that they are told to sell. In a bid to attract and appease the Muslim population, some of these stalls put up ‘fake’ halal signs not issued by MUIS, while others proudly display signages which reads “No Pork, No Lard”. Who are we kidding, these efforts are clearly done to deceive the Muslim population, unless you are telling me that there is another group or community in Singapore who does not consume pork/lard?

    MUIS’s response to the queries in the article attached above seems to be an easy way out for them, absolving themselves of all responsibilities and stating that the onus is on us to verify the halal status of the individual shops. If this is the case, I urge the organizing committee to no longer call it a Ramadan Bazaar, but call it as what it is: a glorified pasar malam. Geylang’s Ramadan Bazaar should be safeguarded but if this were to continue, the bazaar would have lost all meanings and purpose.

    You have those extravagant lights welcoming the Muslim festival of Eid. You have shops selling dates for Muslims to break fast. You have TAA donation boxes for needy Muslims. You have vendors selling garments and carpets for Hari Raya preparation. You can find cookies and goodies which are served in each and every Muslim household. And yet, today, in Geylang’s so called Ramadan Bazaar, you have more than half of the vendors selling food items whose halal status cannot be verified. Tell me this isn’t a problem?

    *EDIT*
    The team at Halalfoodhunt.com and The Halal Food Blog has done an excellent job, excruciatingly going through each and every individual stall to come up with a list of what’s halal and what’s not. May Allah reward their efforts in helping the community.

     

    Source: Ahmad Bin Osman

     

  • Halal Or Not? Doubts Raised Over Some Food Stalls At Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar

    Halal Or Not? Doubts Raised Over Some Food Stalls At Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar

    Soon after photos and videos of the new foods to eat at this year’s much anticipated Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar conquered social media feeds on Friday (26 May), many in the Muslim community raised questions over whether such foods were Muslim-owned or Halal-certified.

    While many food stalls at the Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar may be similar to those you see at regular heartland pasar malams, there remains an expectation within the Muslim community for foods at the Ramadan bazaar to be Muslim-owned or Halal-certified because of the time period.

    The Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar takes place from 25 May to 24 June, and overlaps with the holy Islamic month of Ramadan.

    Located along the stretch of roads between Paya Lebar MRT station and the Geylang Serai Wet Market, this year’s bazaar also see new food stalls offering an array of hip and trendy dishes, desserts and snacks, such as the Rainbow Ice-cream Planet Bun and Candy Floss Burrito.

    However, it’s not clear if all these foods are Halal, which is the Arabic word for “lawful or allowable”.

    [ARTICLE: 9 foods debuting at the Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar this year]

    Not all foods at the Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar are Halal-certified

    Over the weekend, the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) as well as local Halal food blogs “Halal Food Hunt” and “Halal Food Blog” seemed to have been bombarded by queries over the Halal statuses of some stalls at this year’s Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar.

    MUIS is the assigned government body that oversees the Halal certifications of food and beverage businesses in Singapore.

    Queries to MUIS put the spotlight on a particular food stall located along Onan Road that sells barbecued meat, better known as “dendeng”.

    While the logo used by the stall had implied that the supplies had come from DDHS Food Manufacture, which according to MUIS’ twitter account @halalSG, is Halal-certified, it was unclear if that was actually the case.

    Doubts arose after an eyewitness account stated that the stall owner had evaded his question when asked about the type of meat being sold.

    On its MUIS’ Twitter account (@halalSG), the council said, “Fact #1, DDHS, the factory, is Halal-certified.

    “Fact #2: We are unable to confirm the source of dendeng at bazaar stalls, which may or may not get their supplies from DDHS,” they said in a second tweet on Saturday (27 May).

    The Halal status of a stall involves various factors, which include its supplier’s source and food preparation methods.

    MUIS also advised consumers to look out for Halal certificates displayed by stalls if they are unsure. However, not all food stalls had displayed their Halal certificates when Yahoo Lifestyle Singapore went to the bazaar on Friday (26 May).

    While obtaining the Halal certificate is not compulsory in Singapore, MUIS said that Muslim owners have a “religious obligation to ensure that the food they serve is Halal compliant”.

    With that said, MUIS is currently investigating the Halal status of the dendeng stall in question.

    List of Muslim-owned and Halal-certified stalls at the Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar

    However, doubts over the Halal statuses of food stalls at the bazaar did not end there as others shared accounts of stalls appearing Muslim-friendly when they are owned by a non-Muslim and do not have Halal certification.

    To assure patrons going to the bazaar, the teams behind the two local Halal food blogs went down to individual stalls to find out whether they are Halal-certified or Muslim-owned, complete with detailed background explanations to their findings.

    For the purposes of this bazaar, we have either met the owner and asked them to sign off on his or her stall to verify that he or she is responsible for the Halal status of his eatery. In other cases where the owner is unavailable, we have talked to the staff present to ask if the stall is Muslim-owned. If it is, the staff can sign off on our list as proxy to indicate that the stall is Muslim-owned,” said Halal Food Hunt in a blog post.

    Titled “The Ultimate List of What’s Halal at Geylang Serai Ramadan Bazaar… And Why You Should Even Care”, the post was written by a Jumaiyah Mahathir, who said that she has had one and a half years of experience working with the MUIS Halal-Certification process team.

    Here is their list as of Sunday (29 May), 2:04am.

    Joo Chiat / Onan Road Area

    The botak BBQ and grill kebabs (Stall 12 Muslim-owned)
    Kebab Souq (Muslim-owned)
    Matin’s Special Benjo (Stall 7 Muslim-owned)
    Kathira Shiok by Makan shiok (Muslim-owned)
    Softnade galaxy milkshake Thai Mango soft (Stall 9 Muslim-owned)
    Mr Teh Tarik Kathira and Ayam Percik (Source: Their own Halal-certified shop)

    Darul Arqam Area

    Meat my meat (Stall 63 Muslim-owned)
    Famous Vadai (Stall 137 Muslim-owned)
    O Braim (Muslim-owned)
    Katoshka (Stall 74 Muslim-owned)
    WORD fast food rainbow bagel (Stall 50 Muslim-owned)
    Kalye Manila + Kentang Korner (Stall 19 Muslim-owned)
    UYI (Source: Their own Halal-certified shop)
    Istanblue (Stall 38 Muslim-owned)
    Kambing Golek (Stall 43 Muslim-owned)
    Apam Balik Power (Muslim-owned)
    Dendeng duo (Muslim-owned)
    Turkish Kebab House (Stall 44 Muslim-owned)

    Haig Road Area

    Kebab Souq (Stall 136 Muslim-owned)
    Cafe Patani (Stall 141 Muslim-owned)

    Tanjong Katong Area

    King Kentang (Stall 310 Muslim-owned)
    Mr Tiga Layer
    DNS specialist (Stall 314 Muslim-owned)
    Fritters Alchemy tacos gorpis (Stall 303 Muslim-owned)
    Nasi Bukhari (Burrock) (Stall 306 Muslim-owned)
    Authentic Turkish Kebab (Stall 308 Muslim-owned)
    Club FJR iced Jeruk (Muslim-owned)
    Belgaufra (Stall 313 Muslim-owned)
    Ramly Burger (Stall 304 Muslim-owned)
    Chulop! (Muslim-owned)

    Engku Aman (Sim’s Drive)

    Halal Boys (Stall 228 Muslim-owned)
    Istanbul Turkish Kebab and Grill (Muslim-owned)
    Macarons SG (Source: Their own Halal-certified shop)
    Mak Sity’s Kitchen chili beef sloppy Joe (Stall 189 Muslim-owned)
    Serve It Up (Stall 191 Muslim-owned)
    Warna Warni Kueh Raya (Muslim-owned)
    Simply Lamb (Stall 212 Muslim-owned)
    Bakers Lab (macaroons.sg) (Stall 181 (Source: Their own Halal-certified shop)
    Hangover Drinks (Stall 210 Muslim-owned)

    Engku Aman (Haig Road)

    Kathira Shiok (Muslim-owned)
    Apam Balik Power (Muslim-owned)
    Meat my meat (Stall 51 Muslim-owned)
    Poffertjes by Cake Love (Muslim-owned)
    Coco2go by yangoriginal (The Famous Melaka) (Stall 53 Muslim-owned)
    Pisangkeju putupiring (Stall 54 Muslim-owned)
    Aledya Slushies (Stall 55 Muslim-owned)
    Tasconis (Muslim-owned)
    BOOM Briyani (Stall 59 Muslim-owned)
    Broti (Stall 38 Muslim-owned)
    Zapalang (Stall 51 Muslim-owned)
    Word (Stall 8 Muslim-owned)
    Ice Burns (Stall 13 Muslim-owned)
    Potion Labz (Stall 51 Muslim-owned)
    Roti Boyan by Mas Creation (Stall 38 Muslim-owned)
    Lamb and Cucur Station (Stall 62 Muslim-owned)
    On-stick Grills scallops Yakitori (Muslim-owned)
    Briyani Point (Muslim-owned)
    Togok by ZB (Stall 64 Muslim-owned)
    Terang Bulan Murtabak Manistee Gorpis (Muslim-owned)
    Pisang Melokek Adam Road (Stall 66 Muslim-owned)
    Koh Nangkam (Stall 109 Muslim-owned)
    Ramly and Goreng. Goreng (Muslim-owned)
    Kaw Kaw (Stall 90 Muslim-owned and sourced from their own Halal-certified shop)
    Istanbul Express (Muslim-owned)
    El T Ra flying noodles (Stall 43 Muslim-owned)
    Dendeng duo (Muslim-owned)
    Shelburnz (Stall 13 Muslim-owned)
    Mr kebab (Muslim-owned)
    Yummers Colossal Churros (Stall 20 Muslim-owned)
    OL Blend (Muslim-owned)
    Over the Rainbow SG (Stall 61 Muslim-owned)
    Mr Vadai (Stall 42 Muslim-owned)
    Smoolot by NOE pengat Sticky Rice dessert (Muslim-owned)

     

    Source: https://sg.style.yahoo.com/

  • The Day I Got Drenched At Kampong Gelam

    The Day I Got Drenched At Kampong Gelam

    THE DAY I GOT DRENCHED AT KAMPONG GELAM

    #MYFsg office is located at 62A Arab Street, in the heart of Kampong Gelam. It is just 2 minutes walk to Sultan Mosque. I was often asked why I chose that location. To me, its a no brainer. It is a centralised youth hotspot.

    Today, I found out that its not just that.

    Throughout our stay in Kampong Gelam, there have been several funeral prayers conducted at Sultan Mosque for prominent community leaders who spent their life in His servitude, whose legacies helped set Singapore on a path of peace and progress. At MYF, we have a culture encouraging each other to take time to pay our last respect to our pioneer leaders, regardless of their fields. I didn’t think much of of it, then.

    Just recently, the nation laid to rest one of its first-generation leaders, the late Mr Othman Wok. The funeral prayer was conducted at Sultan Mosque. The congregation itself was filled with changemakers, old and young. The sky teared heavily the moment when the casket was being transported in the pouring rain to a gun carriage to begin its journey to the burial site.

    Witnessing the moment barely 5 metres away, its was solemn, drenched.

    That moment, I realised the reason God placed me in Kampong Gelam.

    He wants me to constantly be reminded of the contributions made by our pioneer leaders. The prosperity today could not be achieved without their sacrifices. More than I know, I needed these moments to gather strength to be steadfast in courage and passion into creating a better life, a better tomorrow for the community.

    I was also reminded that there are no such thing as retirement on the path of service. You simply serve till your last breath and may our death too benefits the community, triggering reflection and repentance. When that day come, we can only hope that the next generation is ready to carry on the torch. Moving faster than us. Breaking more things than us.

    It is up to us to live up to the legacy that was left for us, and to leave a legacy that is worthy of our children and of future generations.

    It is no longer a question of how much we believe we owe those living in the future, not just our own children or grandchildren, but the generations of people who will come long after we are gone.

     

    Rilek1Corner

    Credit: Shah Reza

  • The Singapore Muslim Community And The Imam Issue

    The Singapore Muslim Community And The Imam Issue

    By Kamaludeen Mohamed Nasir, Associate Professor of Sociology, Nanyang Technological University

    It is well-known that Singapore is a multi-religious society. The 2014 report by Pew named our city-state as the most religiously diverse among the 232 countries studied. What is assumed in this discourse is that all religions are the same and subjected to similar state-society relations.

    ranking

    2014 ranking on Religious Diversity Index by Pew Research Center

    The fact is, Islam is the most regulated religion in our tiny island and this has been the case for decades. From the appointment of a Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs, to the creation of a statutory board called the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) where the Mufti is located, and to the Administration of Muslim Law Act that has regulatory powers over local mosques and madrasahs (Islamic schools), there is no doubt that Islam is given a unique attention by the state.

    A stark under-appreciation of this social reality, especially among the non-Muslims, is apparent to me in the decade or so that I have been teaching in our local universities. I have always asked my students, that if all the Churches were made to say the exact same thing for their Sunday service with a text provided by an office of a statutory board, how would the Christian community react? The students could not even begin to imagine this! Will this then breed mistrust among the Christian community? This is but just one issue besieging the Muslim populace in Singapore.

    When I had coffee with a top local social scientist of NUS a couple of weeks back, we agreed that Islam is the most hierarchical and bureaucratized religion in Singapore. Failure to understand how Islam is managed leads to a failure in understanding the reaction of its local adherents.

    This distrust of the Muslim religious elites amidst the disciplining of Islam, from prescribed texts for the weekly Friday prayer sermons, to appointed instructors to “upgrade Islam” through the Asatizah Recognition Scheme that makes it mandatory for every religious teacher to be registered (even those teaching Qur’anic reading in the local neighbourhoods), impact heavily on the religious elites. Many scholars have called this age as one characterised by a crisis of religious authority. The situation can be especially dire in our local Muslim community, given the unique structures bearing upon them.

    Distrust breeds distrust. It is not that Singaporean Muslims are predisposed towards being rude or as the Minister of Law put it, “kurang ajar”, towards the state-endorsed religious authority. It is the structures that have been put in place that create such an environment.

    The recent issue regarding the police report made against an Imam for making alleged “incendiary” supplications against Christians and Jews that are outside the MUIS-endorsed text cannot be disentangled from the issue of the autonomy of the Muslim clerics. I have engaged the local religious elites numerous times over the last few years and have rarely met a group that is more in fear. The culture of fear among the religious class is often talked about and in one of the engagements that I had with a group of religious elites, one of them candidly lamented, “We are directed and scripted.”

    It has often been mentioned that attitude reflects leadership. The angry reaction of the Muslim community in light of the Imam issue should be seen against this backdrop. The absence of the voices of the religious elites in the initial stages of the debacle created a void in the community who then went online to make sense of the matter.

    Last week, Assoc Prof Khairudin Aljunied was singled out in parliament for encouraging the “vilification” of the whistle-blower, Terence Nunis.  The fact is that hundreds of Muslims had begun pitching in their views on various platforms after Nunis’ pronouncements on Facebook. This was substantiated in a belated statement by the Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs, Assoc Prof Yaacob Ibrahim, who mentioned that the video uploaded by Nunis had indeed “sparked a storm” and “generated many emotions both online and offline. Many in our community felt angry, because they believe that the postings could be used to cast aspersions on Islam and the asatizah in our Mosques”.

    It is interesting to note that both Assoc Prof Khairudin and the Mufti appropriated a satirical and poetic style respectively, as means of social critique. However, it has been well-documented that the Singaporean brand of criticism is often manifested through humour, satire and poetics as seen in Talkingcock, Mr Brown, Yawning Bread, Jack Neo’s films and the like. Indirect criticism is characteristic of societies living under soft-authoritarian rule.

    There are no differences in opinion that if the allegations against the Imam are proven to be true, his incitement has no place in our multi-religious society. But if it is not – and many among the Muslim community have come to this conclusion upon the explanations provided by numerous local religious scholars who have later gone public in discussing the meaning and context of the supplication – then sadly, the Muslim community will see this as yet another example of disciplining and an attempt to emasculate the local religious fraternity despite the state’s paradoxical pleas for Singaporean Muslims to give the local religious scholars their ears.

    It remains to be seen in the aftermath of the Imam episode if the state would choose to go down the path of imposing further restrictions to ensure that the MUIS-endorsed texts be read to the letter, curtailing any creative license of preachers and punishing any dissent towards state-appointed authority. The more enlightened way must be to empower the religious scholars in the field and to give them ownership over their areas of expertise to prevent religious discourse from being co-opted, hijacked and subjected to ad hominem attacks.

    The coming forward of a good number of religious elites, including its umbrella body, Singapore Islamic Scholars & Religious Teachers Association (PERGAS), with regard to this Imam issue is a good development that needs to be applauded. The social media provides a ready platform for this. These attempts to speak truth to power should also be captured in the mainstream media. PERGAS’ need to again clarify their position after feeling that they were misrepresented in the Malay mainstream media regarding their statement towards Assoc Prof Khairudin is not a good sign. The perception that the Malay mainstream media is not balanced and selective in their reporting has also led many to turn to the cyber-sphere to air their perspectives.

    In fostering this development of active citizenship, we need to keep an eye on encouraging diversity and not just promoting those with a certain kind of thinking that the state can easily manage. This is in line with what the PM had recently mentioned in his interview on February 24th in Today newspaper under the title, “Leaders must be able to take criticism, acknowledge mistakes”. Only then can we move forward as a nation.

     

    Source: TOC

  • Singapore Muslims Must Embrace Change

    Singapore Muslims Must Embrace Change

    zulfikar

    For those interested in political science:

    I have discussed the concept of path dependence in government institutions several times. Basically, in historical institutionalism, a policy, structure or rules tend to be retained from its founding or initial development. Because stable institutions have defined their characteristics, decisions today are based on the choices made before it.

    B. Guy Peters argues that path dependence develop into local optima. In relating economics to policy, he stated:

    “These inefficiencies produce numerous local optima and firms, once they find such a local optimum, seize it and that local optimum becomes the dominant solution to the problem. Phrased more in terms of the operations of government programs, a particular program addressing a policy problem may not be the best in the abstract but once it has been shown to produce some positive results it will dominate other solutions that may in principle, be superior but which will require movement from that existing and seemingly functional program”.

    Path dependence and the adoption of local optima is not confined to government policies. In Singapore, we see a similar behavior with Muslim organizations.

    These organizations have taken an approach in political engagement and regardless of its inefficiencies, have remained within the engagement model. While there are better models to adopt, they are unable or unwilling to change from the way they have always engaged because it appeared to have worked before.

    Thus, the inability for the Muslim community to solve their problems cannot be viewed simply from the government’s refusal to respond or change. Our organizations have been caught in an engagement inertia. Until we acknowledge that the model we have utilised all these years are not the best or most appropriate, we will always remain in this situation.

    We have taken a specific model that has not worked for decades and expect a different result. Either we change our goals, change those we engage with or change how we engage.

    Authored by Zulfikar Shariff