Tag: Singaporeans

  • No By-Elections; Strong Indication Of PAP’s Inability To Honour Championing Of Minority Representation

    No By-Elections; Strong Indication Of PAP’s Inability To Honour Championing Of Minority Representation

    Halimah Yacob resigned today from her seat of Marsiling (red) and as the 7th Speaker of Parliament.

    Thanks to a question raised by WP MP Pritam Singh in Parliament, we now know that the Prime Minister will not call for a by-election in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC (shaded below).

    This is very worrying on two fronts.

    Firstly, this 4-member GRC is, by law, one of the GRCs reserved for Malay minority candidates presumably because of its higher Malay population. With Halimah’s departure, the GRC will have no minority MPs at all. Many of us may not agree with the mechanics or even the basis of the GRC system and may wish to see it reformed. Nonetheless, not calling for a by-election to reinstate a minority Member would speak volumes about the PAP’s commitment to playing by its own rules in its own game that is the much-vaunted GRC system.

    Secondly, the PM’s intention to appoint a Grassroots Advisor in Marsiling ward, instead of calling for a by-election, raises very unsettling questions about how the Government recognises the legitimacy and authority of elected MPs. Does this mean that Government agencies will now accord Grassroots Advisors with as much recognition as elected MPs when residents attend Meet-the-People Sessions seeking help? Does this mean that these unelected Grassroots Advisors can take on other roles that presumably only MPs can undertake? If the answer to these questions is no, then without a by-election, Marsiling-Yew Tee residents are being short-changed. If the answer is yes, it would be even worse, for this would be an admission that the Government can appoint a PAP member to be the Grassroots Advisor for Marsiling with inordinate power and authority, without a single vote having been cast for that person by Singaporeans living there. This would be unsurprising given that PAP candidates who lose in Opposition wards are immediately appointed as the Grassroots Advisors for these wards after each General Election.

    Unsurprising, but inherently unfair to voters.

    Given that we are less than half-way through the term of the present Parliament, not calling for a by-election in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC would be an affront to parliamentary democracy in Singapore, and would be a strong indication of the PAP’s inability to honour its own supposed status of being a champion of minority representation.

    Instead, we are faced with a reserved Presidential Election which harms our social fabric more than it purports to help it, because it may just entrench the idea in people’s minds that minorities are unelectable by way of their own merits alone. How does this advance our progress as a nation?

    (To find out more about how the ward-level layer was made, visit my blog at: https://mappedmusings.wordpress.com/…/mapping-our-home-mapp…. Designed with Map Box.)

     

    Source: Yudhishthra Nathan

  • Makcik Homeless After Fire Gutted Home, Kind Neighbour Took Her In

    Makcik Homeless After Fire Gutted Home, Kind Neighbour Took Her In

    A kind resident took in her neighbour after a fire in the latter’s flat, allowing the family of three to lodge in her home temporarily.

    The fire had broken out in the second-storey flat at Block 372, Jurong East Street 32 on Friday morning (Aug 4).

    Stomp earlier reported on the incident in which seven people were conveyed to hospitals for treatment after inhaling smoke.

    A 62-year-old woman and her two daughters were the occupants of the affected flat.

    After the incident, one of her daughters revealed that she had been using a hair curler, and had placed it on a mattress, after turning off the electricity.

    Later on, there was smoke and the smell of something burning, before the mattress finally caught fire.

    Said the 62-year-old mother: “I was at the market that morning when I received a call from my daughter telling me that there was a strong burning smell.

    “I immediately rushed home, and my daughters wanted to move the mattress out of the unit. However, it suddenly caught fire.”

    The fire spread fast and a neighbour, living in the unit beside theirs, was trapped in her home.

    The 58-year-old neighbour recalled: “I was on medical leave that day. I smelt something burning in the morning, but I was groggy from my fever.

    “Later I heard my husband shouting that something was burning. We opened our door and found a fire in the corridor.

    “There was nowhere we could run to. We were trapped. I started crying and screaming for help. Then I recalled that my neighbour could not move well, and I called her.”

    She said that fortunately, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) arrived in time, and the couple climbed down to safety using a ladder.

    According to her, this was not the first time a fire had broken out in the block.

    She told Shin Min Daily News: “Two years ago, a unit on the left had caught fire at around 3a, in the morning, so this is the second time already.”

    Although the affected flat’s owner has since received keys to a rental flat, her neighbour still insisted that the family stay with her for the time being.

    The neighbour added: “We’re neighbours, so it’s only right that we help each other out.”

     

    Source: http://stomp.straitstimes.com

  • Childcare Overcharged For Kids Meals, Then Claims It’s International Buffet

    Childcare Overcharged For Kids Meals, Then Claims It’s International Buffet

    Dear A.S.S. Editors,

    Parents staying in or near Sengkang/Buankok area will be familiar with this childcare. As a parent, I am here to express my dismay towards the school.

    Every year during Singapore National’s day and Children’s day, the childcare will hold a party in the school which requires parents to fork out $22 per child. the amount are being used to cater for Buffet lunch for each child.

    I thought it is ridiculous to pay that amount since children eat very little and they need not order adult portion for the kids. I questioned what kind of food did they ordered for the children but no one could tell me. I asked the teacher what kind of buffet are they catering for the children that cost $22 per child because for a parent with 3 children to pay 60+ just to go to school and eat buffet is absurd. I was told that its an international buffet. Seriously, pay 60 over dollar? I my as well take leave and stay at home to take care of the children myself.

    Today i happened to pass by the childcare while on my way to work and just so happen, i saw the caterer outside the school. Out of curiosity, i went over to take a look at the food that they send. All the food were packed in see through plastic containers. There were chicken nuggets, fish balls, chicken wings, french fries and beehoon. Not much variety, all the side dishes are finger food and definitely not worth more than $10. I felt unjust and went to the caterer website to check and the highest possible price it could cost after giving the benefit of doubt is only $9.42 after GST. INTERNATIONAL buffet? you mean the caterer’s company name is it?

    According to my child, there were no other external party activities that are held in the school. So where did the remaining amount went? Why try to profit from our hard earned money secretly? let us pay whats right or have a potluck party if you want to save cost. I am sure we will be able to contribute the same type of food for a quarter of the price! We parents wouldn’t mind contributing as long as you don’t take us for a fool and chop us like carrots!

    I know people will say i can just leave the school if i am unhappy with the way they do things. I will. But now, I just want parents to know the truth and consider thrice before enrolling to this school. below are the list of day light robberies:

    school outting/field trips always to free public places: $50+ inc return
    school bus and lunch which is a pathetic hot dog bun. Double of what other school charges.

    year end concert: costume $64.2 + ticket price per pax $64.2.
    total cost for your child to perform with 2 attending parent will be 192+.
    you think we going jay chou concert? rip us off to watch our own children perform.

    reg fee: $250 non refundable. please think before you enroll as there are parents who withdraw after a few days and were unable to get the whooping sum of $250 back. other school charges around $35 for reg fees.

    PVC mattress: the price is enough for you to buy a queen bed. marked up more than 5 x of market rate.

    school uniform: around $50 per set

    last year, there were parents complaining in the childcare’s Facebook page and so they came up with a package price for the school outing. they also deleted their Facebook page immediately so that parents can never unite and make complains again.

    I hope that the director will see this and will come to her sense. Pleasebe transparent with the break down of what your are charging. i can’t believe you call yourself FAITH and quote verses. please restore the faith and don’t ever hold buffet party ever again.

    Angry Mom
    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Biker Killed In PIE Accident, Second Fatal Motorcycle Accident In 2 Days

    Biker Killed In PIE Accident, Second Fatal Motorcycle Accident In 2 Days

    Another motorcyclist was killed in an accident on Tuesday (Aug 8) morning, a day after an accident claimed the life of a 30-year-old motorcyclist.

    The accident on Tuesday happened along the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) after the Dunearn exit, the police said in a Facebook post on Tuesday morning.

    The police told The Straits Times that they were alerted to an accident involving a car and a motorcycle along PIE towards Changi Airport at 7.21am. The 31-year-old male motorcyclist was found lying motionless and was pronounced dead by paramedics at the scene.

    The Straits Times understands that the motorcyclist was riding along the PIE when he hit a wooden plank on the road and flew to the opposite side of the road from the impact. A car coming from the other direction ran over him.

    Videos posted on social media show a blue tent at the scene, along with emergency vehicles.

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force told ST that it was alerted at 7.25am and dispatched an ambulance to the scene. A male motorcyclist in his 30s was pronounced dead at the scene.

    The police advised motorists to avoid using the road, as both directions of the PIE towards Changi Airport and towards Tuas are congested. The Land Transport Authority in a series of tweets told motorists to avoid various lanes on the PIE due to an accident.

    Police investigations are ongoing.

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/

  • Not A Great Start For Reserved EP Contest

    Not A Great Start For Reserved EP Contest

    Singapore’s worst-kept secret is out. Or maybe it’s not a secret. It’s speculation that lacked confirmation – which wouldn’t come. Until last night. So Speaker Halimah Yacob has decided to throw her hat (tudung?) into the presidential ring. The surprise would be if she said she wouldn’t.

    Will anyone question her ethnicity like what happened with the two men who had indicated their intention to run for the top job? Businessman Mr Salleh Marican isn’t fluent in Malay while corporate man Mr Farid Khan is of Pakistani descent. Probably not, or the committee which screened her for suitability as a minority candidate in a Group Representation Constituency for general elections would have much to answer for.

    So that’s a hurdle cleared. Will she pass the other criteria on ability to manage large sums of money and big organisations? The other two contenders are said to be below the threshold for private sector aspirants, which is set as the top executive who runs a company with at least $500 million in shareholder equity, widely acknowledged to be a very stringent criteria. This doesn’t knock them out automatically. They can still make their case before the Presidential Elections Committee by citing other factors. Madam Halimah has no such worries because Speaker of Parliament is one of the public sector jobs that are on the list. Plus, she has been on the job for more than three years.

    In fact, the talk about her possible candidacy surfaced almost as soon as the G published its White Paper in response to the report of the Constitutional Commission on amendments to the presidency. The Commission had suggested that the candidate, whether from the public or private sector, should have at least six years in the top job to “capture at least some elements of the applicant’s performance”. The G decided to keep to the old three years of experience. That meant that Madam Halimah just about made it on the three-year front.

    During the parliamentary debates on the amendments, MPs did not raise queries on the three-year threshold directly, except to note that the private sector requirements seemed rather more onerous than those for the public sector track.

    Then on Feb 6, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Chan Chun Sing let slip and twice referred to Madam Halimah as “Madam President” in Parliament – on the same day that changes to the Presidential Elections Act were debated. Most considered that a show of the PAP’s intentions and now, after some humming and hawing, she has, as expected, put her name in the hat.

    Would Madam Halimah have run if this was not a reserved presidency? Why has she been so coy all this while? One answer could be that she really hadn’t decided whether to run. Another could be that she was waiting for Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s application to the court to declare whether the start date for a reserved presidency, which is this year, was right. A third could be she wanted to announce her intention to her constituents first, in a National Day dinner.

    There is something strange (for want of a better word) about people intending to contest when such a critical matter hadn’t yet been settled – unless it doesn’t matter to them whether it is a reserved or open election. Checks showed that Mr Salleh declared his intention on May 31, more than three weeks after Dr Tan applied his legal challenge on the reserved election to the court (May 5). Mr Farid did so on Jul 11 after Dr Tan failed in his first attempt on Jul 7. Dr Tan appealed the decision the next day (Jul 12). A five-judge court heard arguments from both the G and Dr Tan’s counsel on Jul 31. With the Chief Justice promising a verdict as soon as possible, a week has passed and Madam Halimah has spoken.

    When Mr Farid was asked about Dr Tan’s legal challenge, he said he would contest the election whatever the court outcome. He put his name out early because he was an unknown quantity to the people who would be voting.

    Madam Halimah should have waited; she doesn’t need any name recognition. It can’t be too long before the Chief Justice delivers a verdict given that President Tony Tan’s term expires at the end of this month. Delaying the announcement would be a nod to the dignity of the court and to those who still think that the G (and Parliament) did wrong to count the late Wee Kim Wee as Singapore’s first elected president. In fact, her announcement only adds to the cynicism about the coming election, as if the court verdict is a foregone conclusion. Unless she makes clear it didn’t matter which way the verdict turned.

    But let’s say it will be a reserved election this year, then the hope is that even more Malay candidates will come forth. During the parliamentary debate on the amendments, Workers’ Party MP Pritam Singh made this comment: “I take the position that because minority candidates are likely to be few to begin with, many candidates are likely to enter Presidential elections through the public sector track or public sector deliberative tracks rather than the more stringent private sector track with its $500 million threshold. This may render hollow the Government’s claims that it is not relaxing the criteria to make it easier for minorities to assume the presidency as a result of the latest constitutional changes.’’

    So far, we have two private sector candidates who do not make the automatic threshold and a public sector candidate who just about cleared it. Not a great start.

     

    Source: http://themiddleground.sg