Tag: democracy

  • Muslimah Attending San Jose State University Attacked, Hijab Yanked

    Muslimah Attending San Jose State University Attacked, Hijab Yanked

    SAN JOSE — Esra Altun was walking back to her car at San Jose State University on Wednesday afternoon when someone grabbed her hijab from behind and yanked it backward.

    The 19-year-old sophomore psychology student struggled to breathe as the man pulled hard at her head scarf inside the third floor of the West Garage at Fourth and San Salvador streets.

    “I was trying to gasp for air,” Altun said. “I couldn’t say or do anything. I was paralyzed.”

    The attack lasted just a few seconds. Altun fought back by leaning forward, and when her attacker let go she fell hard to her knees. The man did not say a word, she said.

    The attack came a day after the election of Republican Donald Trump, who at one point proposed a temporary ban on the immigration of Muslims to the United States.

    University police told Altun they could not treat it as a hate crime, but she believes it was racially motivated.

    “It happened a day after Trump was announced as president-elect,” Altun said. “If it was for another reason, it’s such a weird coincidence.”

    University President Mary Papazian said she also found the attack troubling.

    “I think our students have the perception that they were targeted because of their faith,” Papazian said. “Whether or not it rises to the literal level of what a hate crime would be, it certainly is something that we have to pay attention to. And we need to make sure that we have the conversations on campus about how our students of various backgrounds, orientations and affinities are feeling in a time when our nation is having a very dynamic conversation around these issues.”

    There were no cameras in the part of the garage where the attack took place, and Papazian said the college planned to study adding them.

    Similar attacks have been reported elsewhere, including at San Diego State University, where a Muslim student was assaulted and robbed in a campus parking lot. Authorities say the woman, who was wearing a hijab, was targeted because of her faith and that the suspects made comments about Trump’s election, according to the Associated Press. The assault and robbery is being investigated as a hate crime.

    San Jose State University police issued a campus alert Wednesday about the attack on Altun, which happened around 1:15 p.m. She was walking with a group of friends from the Student Union to the garage. She opened her trunk to get something when her hijab was yanked backward.

    Doaa Abdelrahman, president of the college’s Muslim Student Association, also believes the attack was related to the election and Trump’s campaign. She said racism has always existed, but now “it’s fueled by Trump.”

    “I’ve experienced racism for my religion since age 9,” Abdelrahman said. “I think Trump is the cause of a lot of segregation and division between people. I think racism always occurs around the world, This is a topic that needs to be addressed. I’m glad it’s out in the surface.”

    University spokeswoman Pat Harris said the case remains under investigation and encouraged anyone with information to step forward.

    “We are of course very concerned that this has occurred on our campus. No one should experience this kind of behavior at San Jose State,” said Harris, adding that the college “encourages faculty, staff, and students to report all incidents so that we can track trends and respond appropriately in addition to conducting investigations of all cases.”

    In the first 24 hours after the attack, Altun said she has received tremendous support from the campus community, including people offering to walk her to her car.

    “On Twitter, people were posting about it and they were outraged,” she said. “They don’t even know who I am. That’s an amazing thing to see. And I hope that support goes out to every group that needs it.”

     

    Source: www.mercurynews.com

  • Goh Meng Seng: Robust Political System With Institutionalised Separation Of Power Key To Democratic Survival, Progress

    Goh Meng Seng: Robust Political System With Institutionalised Separation Of Power Key To Democratic Survival, Progress

    Thought of the Day

    Folks, it is NOT END OF THE WORLD to have President Trump! Unlike Singapore, US has a more ROBUST Democratic political system with Separation of Powers institutionalized and embedded to effect REAL Checks and Balances. No matter how moronic or idiotic the President is, he or she will be checked and prevented from doing too much bad!

    An idiotic or moronic President may not do much good, but at least for the next 4 years, he or she won’t do too much bad as well. 4 years later, if he could not perform or basically screwed up, the voters will just kick him out!

    So instead of feeling devastated for Trump victory, we should learn something from this saga: It is more important to build a robust political system which has Separation of Powers institutionalized to effect Real checks and balances instead of betting on the hope that we could always choose wise and good guys into government!

     

    Source: Goh Meng Seng

  • Ismail Kassim: Reserved Elected Presidency Is Backward Step For Multiracialism, Meritocracy And Democracy

    Ismail Kassim: Reserved Elected Presidency Is Backward Step For Multiracialism, Meritocracy And Democracy

    Thank you PM for your unsolicited gift
    But we don’t want and don’t need it
    Do you realise that your gift will only
    Reinforce the negative images of us
    And undermine our past progress

    What we want, you don’t want to give
    Full equality for our males in National Service
    And in all sectors of the Armed Forces
    Full employment opportunities for all our
    Women including the tudung-clad ones
    We have waited for 50 years for equal
    Treatment and equal opportunities
    Do we have to wait for another 50 years?

    If there has been no Malay president for
    More than four decades, whose fault is it?
    Is it the Malays, the People, or the PAP?
    If it is so important to you
    Why give SR a second term?
    Why not a Malay then?

    You have assumed that no Malay
    Can ever be elected in an open race
    But have you tried? Why not?
    After winning 70% the last round,
    Why the lack of confidence?
    Why the haste to admit defeat?
    Or maybe the gift to us is nothing more than
    Political expediency to avoid a tough opponent
    And to thwart the will of the people

    On the day a Malay assumes the EP
    Through a reserved race will be
    A Day of Shame for us and for all the people
    It will be a step backward for multiracialism
    And meritocracy and democracy

     

    Source: Ismail Kassim

  • Walid J. Abdullah: World Has To Deal With Failings Of American Democracy

    Walid J. Abdullah: World Has To Deal With Failings Of American Democracy

    Perhaps 2016 will teach us not to adopt a holier-than-thou approach towards those who disagree with us. Dismissing everyone who is a Trump supporter as a racist, xenophobic idiot evidently did not work out well.

    Sure, there are racists and deplorables amongst them. But there were people with genuine concerns that were not addressed, and instead of having their sentiments understood, they were dismissed as racists. Of course they would turn to Trump afterwards!

    The media especially has blood on its hands. In spite of not being a Trump fan, i found the media coverage – particularly by Huffington Post – to be absolutely disgusting. Clearly one-sided. If i were an undecided voter, the media coverage would push me towards Trump. I hope the liberal media is proud of itself now.

    Trump has won. Whether we like it or not, those are the rules of the game. We have to deal with a President Trump.

    Unless you’re the US government (democrat or republican). Then you don’t have to respect other people’s aspirations. Just dismiss them as Islamic fundamentalists and then engineer a coup.

    For peasants like the rest of the world, we have to deal with the failings of American democracy.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • M Ravi Barred From Applying For Certificate To Practice For 2 Years

    M Ravi Barred From Applying For Certificate To Practice For 2 Years

    The Court of Three Judges has decided that lawyer M Ravi who was ordered to stop practising in Feb 2015 should be prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a period of 2 years. In its judgment released today (27 Oct), the Court said that this was necessary to safeguard the interests of the public and to uphold public confidence in the integrity of the legal profession.

    Mr Ravi’s case was brought before the Court of Three Judges after he pleaded guilty to four charges of misconduct before a disciplinary tribunal last year. The tribunal, in its report released in December 2015 said that a prima facie case had been established against Mr Ravi since he had “pleaded guilty to the four charges and his mental condition as per the evidence of Dr (Tommy) Tan (a psychiatrist) does not exculpate him for his various acts of misconduct but are mitigating factors only”.

    Mr Ravi had earlier pleaded guilty to four charges of misconduct, which include creating a ruckus at the Law Society premises on 10 Feb 2015 and another charge of making inappropriate statements against the Law Society president and his family members in a Facebook post. He was also found guilty of  making false allegations against two lawyers in Feb 2015.

    The tribunal referred Mr Ravi’s case to the Court of Three Judges as it had no power to penalise a non-practising lawyer.

    On 6 Sep, Mr Ravi’s lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam sought an overall fine of $10,000 ($2,500 per offence) and pleaded for the Court to take his client’s mental illness into account.

    The Law Society’s lawyer, Mr Sean La’Brooy, did not object to a fine. He however, in arguing that Mr Ravi’s condition should not “exonerate” him, sought a higher quantum of at least $5,000 for one of the offences.

    The three judges that heard the case — CJ Menon and Judges of Appeal Andrew Phang and Tay Yong Kwang – described Mr Ravi’s conduct as “reprehensible” and “disturbing”.

    CJ Menon had then asked: “(Are we) not going to hold a solicitor to the standards expected of him? … The whole thing may have been avoided if (Mr Ravi) had taken the doctor’s advice … Should we say because he has a medical condition, we punish him differently?”

    The Court had other sentencing options besides prohibiting Mr Ravi from practicing. Among these options are to censure him, to order him to pay a penalty of not more than $20,000, or to strike his name off the roll of lawyers.

    In delivering the verdict today, CJ Menon said that the Court was presented with a situation where Mr Ravi has a mental condition which has in the past caused him to act in a manner unbecoming of a lawyer. He said that there is a possibility that this may happen again in the future.

    “In this circumstances, we consider that anything short of prohibiting the respondent for a substantial period of time from applying for a practicing certificate would be inadequate,” the verdict read.

    Commenting on the verdict Mr Ravi said the following in his Facebook:

    “The Court of Appeal handed out a judgement today prohibiting me from practising law for a period of two years. I have already been out of practice for more than 18 months. My doctor had certified me fit to practice since December last year.The Law Society had approved my application for Practising Certificate in August 2016. However the Attorney General objected to my Practising Certificate. During the hearing before the Court of Appeal the Law Society had agreed that a fine is an appropriate penalty in line with the recommendation made by the Disciplinary Tribunal below.

    I accept that I did not behave appropriately when I was unwell. However, the Court of Appeal’s Judgment is acutely disproportionate in view of the Disciplinary Tribunals recommendation of a fine. The effect of the Court of Appeal’s judgment means I am put (out) of Practice of Law for close to 4 years.

    However in as much I am devastated, this will not deter me from continuing my work in the field of international human rights and constitutional law and contribute to society where I can. To this extent, I will continue my work by assisting the firm of Eugene Thuraisingam LLP in my current role as a Head of Knowledge Management and Strategic Alliance Division.”

     

    Source: http://theindependent.sg