Tag: Oxley Road

  • Lee Wei Ling: Hsien Yang And I Did Not Plan To Profit From The Deal

    Lee Wei Ling: Hsien Yang And I Did Not Plan To Profit From The Deal

    When Hsien Loong offered to sell Oxley to me for SD$1.00, I immediately asked Hsien Yang to be part of the deal with me. I have neither the time, nor the inclination to deal with the house on my own. Hsien Yang did not ask to join me in purchasing the house for $1. Also, Hsien Yang had long planned to demolished the house when I no longer need it & convert it into a public garden. Neither of us were planning to profit from the deal.

    As for the donation to charity, Papa was very clear in his mind, he & Mama had paid for the property at the full financial value when they bought it, there was there for no need to donate to charity any money related to transactions on Oxley.

     

    Source: Lee Wei Ling

  • Lee Hsien Loong Must Step Down, Clear His Name In Court As Private Citizen

    Lee Hsien Loong Must Step Down, Clear His Name In Court As Private Citizen

    If he truly is a leader and if he really cares about Singapore, then Lee Hsien Loong must make the ultimate sacrifice and step down as PM.

    Singapore has been dragged through the mud by the dispute. Enough is enough.

    If there was no wrongdoing on the part of the government and there was no abuse of power, then Lee Hsien Loong must do the honourable thing and resign. He can take his siblings to court as a private citizen and defend his own integrity. Keep it a family matter.

    What’s there to be afraid of? He won’t be PM for much longer.

    Who will step up? Everyone’s favourite Tharman already ruled himself out. Heng Swee Keat dropped out of the running after his stroke. Ong Ye Kung is still in his first term as MP and Minister.

    Who else is ready? And can Singaporeans accept Chan Chun Sing or Lawrence Wong as PM? It cannot get any worse than what it is now. Singapore needs to move on. The ball is in Lee Hsien Loong’s court.

     

    Khalid

    Reader Contribution

  • Lee Hsien Loong’s Refusal To Sue Siblings Confirmed That Elites And Normal Singaporeans Treated Differently

    Lee Hsien Loong’s Refusal To Sue Siblings Confirmed That Elites And Normal Singaporeans Treated Differently

    My comment posted on Tharman’s Facebook:

    I feel sad that we have now confirmed that there are two sets of laws for Singaporeans – one set for the elite and connected, and another for the ordinary Singaporean.

    LHY and LWL are allowed to cast all sorts of aspersions at the PM, our public servants and public institutions.

    These are not one-off allegations.

    They are serious and numerous allegations, made in a sustained manner over more than 2 weeks.

    Yet, we are today given flimsy excuses why legal action will not be taken against them.

    On the other hand, less powerful or connected Singaporeans are subjected to the law of defamation, lawsuit issued in an instance and some are bankrupted or have run away from Singapore in fear.

    As the NMPs asked in Parliament, and I paraphrase: how do you explain, Mr Tharman, this double standards?

    You said a few days ago to Singaporeans, “Have confidence, folks.”

    Perhaps you should try on the shoes of those who have been sued, bankrupted or gone into exile.

    As one who supports you being PM, I am disappointed at your nonchalance in this saga.

     

    Source: Andrew Loh

  • Rahayu Mahzam: Using Statutory Declaration Appears Like Backdoor Approach To Challenging Validity Of Will

    Rahayu Mahzam: Using Statutory Declaration Appears Like Backdoor Approach To Challenging Validity Of Will

    “As a grant of probate has been granted and there is no challenge, the will should be taken as valid and proper. You (PM Lee) have, however, in your statutory declaration submitted to the ministerial committee alluding to certain questionable circumstances upon which the will was executed,” MP Rahayu Mahzam said.

    “This may appear to be a backdoor approach in challenging the validity of the will. Could you therefore clarify why you found it necessary to affirm the statutory declaration and your intentions in doing so?

    “Why could you not just rely on the words of the will which in itself contemplated a situation where the house is not being demolished?” she asked.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Low Thia Khiang: Settle Family Dispute In Court

    Low Thia Khiang: Settle Family Dispute In Court

    Workers’ Party chief Low Thia Khiang called on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to settle the “private, family dispute” between him and his younger siblings in court, noting that less serious allegations had been dealt with under libel.

    “Individuals who made less serious allegations that undermined the reputation and authority of the Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers have been brought to task for libel. There is no reason why this time it should be different because it comes from the Lee family. In fact, the allegations are much more serious,” said Mr Low, who is Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC, in Parliament on Monday (July 3).

    Slamming how the family saga playing out on Facebook has created an “ugly media circus”, Mr Low added: “Settling this in court will enable everyone to put forward their sides of the story with evidence.”

    Amid this dispute, the line between the private and the public domains have been “blurred (and) crossed too many times” by PM Lee, siblings, as well as other members of the Government, he said.

    This has distracted the Government and Singaporeans from “far more important issues”, and also damaged the Republic’s reputation on the international stage, he said.

    The dispute created a public ruckus at an “unfortunate” time, when the Republic is confronted by wide-ranging challenges in the economic, geo-political and security areas, among others.

    “We need to restore the line, make it a bright, red line, and restore the dispute that has crossed into the public domain and push (it) back into the private domain. We need to do this so as to move on to far more important issues that are truly national issues,” said Mr Low, citing as examples the heightening security situation in the region and Singapore’s perennial challenges with infrastructure like public transportation.

    He added: “This saga is distracting the Government, distracting Singaporeans, and distracting the international audience (by) damaging the Singapore brand.”

    Dr Lee and Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s allegations against PM Lee via a “continuous media campaign”—made on scattered evidence centered on family displeasure—undermine the Prime Minister’s authority and “does not make for constructive politics in Singapore”, he said.

    But PM Lee and the Government also should not have contributed to the squabble, said Mr Low.

    “The Government should set an example… It should not be involved in (the) Facebook brawl for the whole world to see… (It) should not continue with this dispute in the public domain,” he said, urging PM Lee to “take action to put (the public spat) to a stop”.

     

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com